Re: [vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread Jeff Koch
We have 4GB's of RAM on the I-RAM which should be more than enough for the qmail queue and log files. I'll check out JFS. Thanks At 06:49 PM 12/21/2007, you wrote: Jeff Koch wrote: We're setting up a new mailserver with a Gigabyte i-ram drive to handle the qmail queue, and qmail logs. The

Re: [vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread Ed McLain
Hrmm.. Haven't had any of those issues. We run XFS religiously on all data and hd intensive apps and in 8 years I don't recall once ever having XFS crap out on us without a hardware failure. As for recoveries after a hardware failure, I've only had to do 3 or 4. On one of them we had a buggy

Re: [vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread Christopher Chan
Ed McLain wrote: XFS.. I'm addicted and will freely admit it. We ran some benchmarks a while back between EXT3, XFS, JFS, and ReiserFS with both qmail and mysql. While MySQL didn't care much, qmail was able to deliver between 10,000 and 20,000 messages per minute more on XFS than either other

Re: [vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread Christopher Chan
Jeff Koch wrote: We're setting up a new mailserver with a Gigabyte i-ram drive to handle the qmail queue, and qmail logs. The i-ram drive uses standard DDR modules, has a battery backup and is lightning fast - much faster than solid state drives. We'll use SATA RAID for the maildirs and rema

Re: [vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread Quey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've heard good things about xfs, but no personal experience. However, I would STRONGLY DISCOURAGE you from running reiserfs for this. I've seen, and dealt with, resierfs corrupting filesystems and it's a nightmare. I do not have a good opinion of resierfs after real worl

RE: [vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread Tren Blackburn
I can speak from experience. I used to use only ReiserFS, until I had a corruption on a 60GB Maildir mailstore. A tree rebuild was required. This took a whopping 17 hours on a high end Apple XServe RAID Array. Needless to say that after this I've migrated away from ReiserFS to XFS and have been v

Re: [vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread mike
> I'd like to get some input on the best filesystem for the i-ram drive. > EXT3 > is out because writes are slowed to the speed of a hard drive. I'm leaning > towards reiserfs or xfs. However, I've read (wikipedia) that reiserfs is > easily corrupted. xfs seems the best. > > Anyone have any comment

Re: [vchkpw] [OT] IMAP Servers: Dovecot or Binc?

2007-12-21 Thread Remo Mattei
yes I did any other suggestion? Thanks Shane Chrisp wrote: >> I had to disable that since some of the people with no quota set were >> getting errors saying user is over quota and bounced messages. Any >> suggestions on that? >> >> remo > > > Did you have this option set? > > plugin { > quot

Re: [vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread Ed McLain
XFS.. I'm addicted and will freely admit it. We ran some benchmarks a while back between EXT3, XFS, JFS, and ReiserFS with both qmail and mysql. While MySQL didn't care much, qmail was able to deliver between 10,000 and 20,000 messages per minute more on XFS than either other option. Also, ha

Re: [vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread Michael Johnson
Jeff Koch wrote: > > > We're setting up a new mailserver with a Gigabyte i-ram drive to handle > the qmail queue, and qmail logs. The i-ram drive uses standard DDR > modules, has a battery backup and is lightning fast - much faster than > solid state drives. We'll use SATA RAID for the maildirs a

[vchkpw] OT - Preferred File Systems

2007-12-21 Thread Jeff Koch
We're setting up a new mailserver with a Gigabyte i-ram drive to handle the qmail queue, and qmail logs. The i-ram drive uses standard DDR modules, has a battery backup and is lightning fast - much faster than solid state drives. We'll use SATA RAID for the maildirs and remainder of the serve