On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 11:15 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Are you sure this diff is against 5.3.16? It does not apply to my
copy, or the one on Inter7's devel page (which should be the same).
bah... I looked at the diff and saw ^Ms at the end of all the lines so
I
stripped them ou
> Are you sure this diff is against 5.3.16? It does not apply to my
> copy, or the one on Inter7's devel page (which should be the same).
bah... I looked at the diff and saw ^Ms at the end of all the lines so I
stripped them out. Attached is a fixed version that *does* apply.
Regards,
Andrew
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 08:33 PM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
Anyone? There must be some developmental work going on with it or it
wouldn't have been in the tarball. I am willing to help work on it
but I
need some help getting over this initial hurdle (cleanly).
Nice, responsive list
Hi, everyone.
Just wanted to clear a few things up :)
As far as CVS is concerned, Inter7's development team is not the
largest. I tried to make the case for CVS some time ago, but it
isnt looking as if it will fly.
If you're interested in new
development on vpopmail, take a look on www.shupp.or
On Thursday 20 February 2003 09:59, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > 1.) CVS
>
> I strongly agree. The development snapshots are nice and all but for those
> of us who are trying to hack on it CVS would be a real boon. Especially
> with the new website design that thends to hide what I'd call the CVS
> 1.) CVS
I strongly agree. The development snapshots are nice and all but for those of
us who are trying to hack on it CVS would be a real boon. Especially with
the new website design that thends to hide what I'd call the CVS snapshot
versions.
> 2.) Actually reading their own mailing lists
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 23:33, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > Anyone? There must be some developmental work going on with it or it
> > wouldn't have been in the tarball. I am willing to help work on it but I
> > need some help getting over this initial hurdle (cleanly).
>
> Nice, responsive li
That's good. Haven't played with postgres lately. MySQL seemed
easy and quick enough. I've added a patch that checks the return
code from vopen_smtp_relay(). It used to be void. I changed the
interpretation such that it needs to return non-zero if the given
IP address wasn't already in the ta
> Anyone? There must be some developmental work going on with it or it
> wouldn't have been in the tarball. I am willing to help work on it but I
> need some help getting over this initial hurdle (cleanly).
Nice, responsive list. :-/
Attached is a patch to 5.3.16 which will get vpgsql to actua
> Ok I see that vpgsql is there... how the hell do I turn it on? The
> configure script has no clue about it, and I don't see a reference in
> Makefile.in at all
Anyone? There must be some developmental work going on with it or it wouldn't
have been in the tarball. I am willing to help wor
Ok I see that vpgsql is there... how the hell do I turn it on? The configure
script has no clue about it, and I don't see a reference in Makefile.in at
all
Regards,
Andrew
11 matches
Mail list logo
