At 11:47 PM 6/30/2005, you wrote:
> i wish - except for this config option when i built vpopmail:
> --disable-rebuild-tcpserver-file \
> neither my /service/smtpd/tcp.cdb nor /u1/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb are
being accessed.
vpopmail does not need to access these files. tcpserver needs to. Just
add so
There is no need to change the code...
Once you've enabled
#define CHKUSER_RCPT_LIMIT_VARIABLE "CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT"
it's enought you declare this variable "CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT" with the limit
you want before running qmail-smtpd.
So add a
export CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50
before runnin
Oh, interesting... Thanks
DAve wrote:
James McMillan wrote:
Ok, just for fun... I chmod -R 777 the postmaster dir.
Then I logged in, and sent a mail, and back, then checked the new
permissions.
Now the directory shows uid 89, which is my old mailservers uid for
vpopmail. The new serv
qmail-tap patch can be found on
http://www.inter7.com/?page=qmailtap
New Release version 1.1 Mon Jun 6 13:18:04 CDT 2005
This version allows for setting a different email address for each line in
the taps control file. The new syntax is "email address to tap":"Address to
send the copy to".
For ex
Hi list!
I've setup netqmail (http://qmail.org/netqmail/)
with toaster patch (http://shupp.com/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2)
on FreeBSD 5.4 with vpopmail (check user patch), courier-imap, sqwebmail
(full toaster but without virus scanner at all) for network about 3k
users.
This is qmail-
Hi list!
I've setup netqmail (http://qmail.org/netqmail/)
with toaster patch (http://shupp.com/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2)
on FreeBSD 5.4 with vpopmail (check user patch), courier-imap, sqwebmail
(full toaster but without virus scanner at all) for network about 3k
users.
This is qmail-
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote:
Hi list!
> everything work but 40 qmail-smtpd processes (or less nevermind) eat my
> CPU time up to 100 %
> (CPU states: 94.5% user, 0.0% nice, 3.1% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0%
> idle)
>
Is it actually the Qmail processes that are using
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 00:19 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote:
> Hi list!
> Is it actually the Qmail processes that are using the CPU or is it
> something else. Whats showing up in top or iostat/vmstat etc. That will
> at least give you a clue where
On Thursday 30 June 2005 06:14 pm, Brian Lanier wrote:
>
> My understanding was that the when addressed to someone on the BCC line it
> simply existed as roughly [EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought each message only had
> one
> envelope recipient so that to have the message go to multiple parties you
> go
On Friday 01 July 2005 02:09 am, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
> At 11:47 PM 6/30/2005, you wrote:
> > > i wish - except for this config option when i built vpopmail:
> > > --disable-rebuild-tcpserver-file \
> > >
> > > neither my /service/smtpd/tcp.cdb nor /u1/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb are
> >
> > being acces
doh. you are right. I wonder why I didn't think of that myself. it works fine,
thanks!
--
Igor
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 08:49:38AM +0100, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
->
-> There is no need to change the code...
->
-> Once you've enabled
-> #define CHKUSER_RCPT_LIMIT_VARIABLE "CHKUSER_
Shane Chrisp wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote:
Hi list!
everything work but 40 qmail-smtpd processes (or less nevermind) eat my
CPU time up to 100 %
(CPU states: 94.5% user, 0.0% nice, 3.1% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0%
idle)
Is it actually the Qmail p
Shane Chrisp wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 00:19 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote:
Hi list!
Is it actually the Qmail processes that are using the CPU or is it
something else. Whats showing up in top or iostat/vmstat etc. That will
at
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 19:49 +0300, Anton Butsyk wrote:
> For now only 11 connections to qmail:
>
> 97 processes: 11 running, 86 sleeping
> CPU states: 95.7% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 2.3% interrupt, 0.0%
> idle
> Mem: 53M Active, 53M Inact, 46M Wired, 59M Buf, 329M Free
> Swap: 1024M To
Anton Butsyk wrote:
Hi list!
I've setup netqmail (http://qmail.org/netqmail/)
with toaster patch (http://shupp.com/patches/qmail-toaster-0.7.2.patch.bz2)
on FreeBSD 5.4 with vpopmail (check user patch), courier-imap, sqwebmail
(full toaster but without virus scanner at all) for network about 3k
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 13:02 -0500, DAve wrote:
> > #!/bin/sh
> > exec 2>&1
> > QMAIL="/var/qmail"
> > ME=$(head -1 $QMAIL/control/me)
> > PATH="$QMAIL/bin:$PATH"
> > USER=${USER:="qmaild"}
> >
> > exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 500 \
> > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -DURl $ME
> > -x$QMAI
> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 500 \
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -DURl $ME
> -x $QMAIL/control/qmail-smtpd.cdb -u "qmaild" 0 smtp \
> /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -r bl.spamcop.net \
> -rlist.dsbl.org \
> -rcbl.abuseat.org \
> $QMAIL/bin/qmail-smtpd
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeremy Kitchen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 9:40 AM
>To: vchkpw@inter7.com
>Subject: Re: [vchkpw] qmail-tap patch + spamcontrol
>
>On Thursday 30 June 2005 06:14 pm, Brian Lanier wrote:
>>
>> My understanding was that the when addressed
If you've got TLS, did you do the following steps (copied from Shupp's
Toaster):
qmailctl stop
make cert
# enter your company's information
make tmprsadh
# NOTE: This may take a LONG time
# now add the followowing line to your crontab via `crontab -e` to
update these temp keys each night
01
Hello Paul,
On Friday, July 1, 2005 at 9:09:22 AM Paul wrote:
>> > i wish - except for this config option when i built vpopmail:
>> > --disable-rebuild-tcpserver-file \
>>
>> > neither my /service/smtpd/tcp.cdb nor /u1/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb are
>> being accessed.
>>
>>vpopmail does not need to access
At 02:48 PM 7/1/2005, you wrote:
YMMD, but 'fopen()', a fast, hash-driven, seek (the way 'cdb' works)
and a quick 'read' for a few bytes should be less overhead than a
complete SQL query, including parsing the result. Even if your MySQL
would run locally and accessed through UNIX-socket I'd expec
21 matches
Mail list logo
