Re: [vchkpw] lets stop the fight!

2003-09-10 Thread Boris Pavlov
100% right. it will be really a pain to have two separate sources. and if they don't agree between, i think that ken should keep the name vpopmail for this product. the manner and style for the comments does not apply there. futuremore, the public can not what happened between tom and ken,

Re: [vchkpw] [OT?] Courier-imap compile without pop3d

2004-06-18 Thread Boris Pavlov
courier-imap is w/o pop3, the whole courier is smtp+(s)pop3/imap(s)/sqwebmail package. wwell edi PS anyway, you can simply not start any courier's service you don't use (ssl imap in your case) Jean Wainer wrote: I dont know if this is the right list to ask.. But is it possible to compile

Re: [vchkpw] program to give reports opn mailboxes and users

2004-11-12 Thread Boris Pavlov
in addition, one can use: /home/vpopmail/bin# ./vuserinfo vuserinfo: usage: [options] email_address options: -v (print version number) -a (display all fields, this is the default) -n (display name field) -p (display crypted password) -u (display uid field)

Re: [vchkpw] moving maildirs to a new home

2005-03-22 Thread Boris Pavlov
Bob Ababurko wrote: - Original Message - From: Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:23 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] moving maildirs to a new home On Mar 21, 2005, at 8:38 PM, Rick Widmer wrote: i feel that all that I have to do is remedy

Re: [vchkpw] vdelivermail

2005-04-07 Thread Boris Pavlov
mario, you did changed the location of vpopmail but copied the old domains/ directory, right? if so, you must change many things, firstly, check if the vpopmail user and vchkpw group have same id's in /etc/passwd. if so, you can go on w/o reinstall secondly, you must check out the qmail's assing

Re: [vchkpw] How I can deny smtp request from a known IP address

2005-04-13 Thread Boris Pavlov
if it is a massive spam, better filter it out with packet filter - iptables, ipchains pf etc, it depends from the OS you're using. the fastest possible (the command is under linux) way to effective block is with route route add -host 1.1.1.1 gw 127.0.0.1 the line in tcp.smtp (and rebuild with

Re: [vchkpw] How I can deny smtp request from a known IP address

2005-04-13 Thread Boris Pavlov
won't use it. Stoyan On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:18, Boris Pavlov wrote: /do not be so sure - it will not permit a tcp conversation;).and it is easier to use, and, besides, (almost) all of the unixes have route or similar, which is not the case with packet filters. quickdirty, but works fine, works

Re: [vchkpw] what webmail

2005-05-04 Thread Boris Pavlov
mihamina, others, pop3 based, use their own databases. btw, they (can) keep the inbound mail in the pop3 server. anyway, if you can live with sqwebmail, do it. it is awesome, and, really, no imap/no pop. so, humble advice - if you (can) have the webmail on the same server, use sqwebmail. if you

Re: [vchkpw] what webmail

2005-05-05 Thread Boris Pavlov
, 2005-05-04 at 14:04 +0300, Boris Pavlov wrote: so, humble advice I asked for advices. Yours is welcome to me. Thanks again! :-) if you (can) have the webmail on the same server, use sqwebmail Well. The mail server is on the same machine. Let's see how does it (sqwebmail) behave

Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-14 Thread Boris Pavlov
just run another mail server. on a different machine or port. better on a different machine - if you want to have really internal mail, you must have internal server - meaning security. wwell edi Bruno Negrão wrote: Hi guys, As managers and directors of the companies are getting more

Re: [vchkpw] REQUEST FOR NEW FEATURE: INTERNAL-ONLY ACCOUNTS

2005-06-14 Thread Boris Pavlov
Bruno Negrão wrote: Thanks Tom, but this is not what I'm looking for. I want that, in the same domain and network, some users can send-receive external emails and some user are interal-only. regards, bruno place a second, relay-only server, and block there. the main server will be used

Re: [vchkpw] validate from

2005-12-06 Thread Boris Pavlov
Hi, And how the name/account under which the user gained access to send mail will appear in the Received headers? Tom Collins wrote: On Oct 25, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Ingo Claro wrote: How can I do that with smtp auth qmail validates that the from must be the same that the auth user? the

Re: [vchkpw] [Fwd: qmail comparison]

2006-03-28 Thread Boris Pavlov
yes, sir, right away, SIR! PS try http://www.google.com/search?num=30hl=ensafe=offq=comparison+of+qmail+with+other+MTA+client+like+Exchangespell=1 yes, googling. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, what is this no one replyed to my mail Original Message

Re: [vchkpw] Re: Segfaulting in vadddomain

2006-06-15 Thread Boris Pavlov
Bill Gradwohl wrote: I had this problem a few weeks ago on a Fedora Core 4 system, and it turned out to be a problem somewhere in the kernel or support libraries. I reported it and it was resolved when a new kernel build came out. can you post here some more info - it will not be fedora, but

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmaild use 99% of CPU

2007-11-30 Thread Boris Pavlov
imap? Alessio Cecchi wrote: Hello all, i'm using vpopmaild to manage some domains (add_user, add_alias ...) with a simply php script run on a remote web service. Many time vpopmaild after some command remains to use all CPU TIME as long as I kill vpopmaild process: PID USER PR NI

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmaild use 99% of CPU

2007-11-30 Thread Boris Pavlov
Alessio Cecchi wrote: Il Friday 30 November 2007 11:18:48 Boris Pavlov ha scritto: imap? what you mean? skip it, sorry, my mistake. !DSPAM:474ff8c932001749358807!

Re: [vchkpw] After 7 years of neglect Qmail is now ours

2007-12-03 Thread Boris Pavlov
Quey wrote: Dan J Bernstein has recently put Qmail into the public domain, _http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html_ HAH! Is this confirmed in some way? !DSPAM:475423b232001190216534!

Re: [vchkpw] no mailbox?!

2008-05-27 Thread Boris Pavlov
do [EMAIL PROTECTED] receives mail? edi. !DSPAM:483bbc0e32358322360014!

Re: [vchkpw] ANNOUNCE: IndiMail authmodule for courier-imap

2008-08-27 Thread Boris Pavlov
Quey wrote: [snip bunch of ego boosts] be gone troll offtopic: Quey, or whatever your boss calls you, there is troll around here but it is not Tom Collins. Go fuck yourself - but somewhere else, PLEASE? We are trying to do get some useful info reading this list, not some dick size