Re: [vchkpw] VpopMail upgrade

2006-06-29 Thread Austin Jorden
I figured out my problem. Thanks anyways!
If anybody wants to know what I did, let me know.  It's a hassle to explain
it for no reason.

Thanks,

Austin Jorden

- Original Message - 
From: "Ed McLain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 7:59 PM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] VpopMail upgrade


> What backend is vpopmail using for it's storage (cdb/mysql/ldap)?  That
> will determine what steps need to be taken.  In most cases however,
> moving from one server to another is a fairly painless job as long as
> you get your bases covered and there should be no loss in emails or
> accounts when doing the upgrade.  For me personally I've moved my
> current user base across 4 different servers with only a blip of an
> outage while transferring over the current email store and changing the
> ip of the new and old boxes.
>
> On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:00 -0500, Austin Jorden wrote:
> > Oh I'm sorry, it's still 1.03 that's installed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Austin Jorden
> > (972) 284-4909
> > Digitalpath of Texas
> > http://www.dptexas.net/
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:54 AM
> > To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> > Subject: Re: [vchkpw] VpopMail upgrade
> >
> >
> >
> > Austin Jorden wrote:
> > >
> > > I have an older machine that has over 450 email accounts.
> > >
> > > It has:
> > >
> > > Vpopmail 4.9.8
> > >
> > > QMail 1.03
> > >
> > > No IMAP installed.
> > >
> > > I need to transfer all this stuff over to a new updated server that
has:
> > >
> > > Vpopmail 5.4.13
> > >
> > > QMail 2.2.1
> > >
> > Are you sure you have qmail 2.2.1?
> > >
> > > QmailAd 1.2.9
> > >
> > > VQadmin
> > >
> > > Squirrel Mail
> > >
> > > However I don't know how-to do this. I do not know the older server's
> > > postmaster password. I can change it by using vQadmin; however I can't
> > > install it because vpopmail is not up2date. My plan is this:
> > >
> > > 1.) Update vpopmail
> > >
> > > 2.) Install vQadmin
> > >
> > > 3.) Get/change postmaster password
> > >
> > > Will I loose emails / domains / accounts if I update Vpopmail?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Austin Jorden
> > >
> > > (972) 284-4909
> > >
> > > Digitalpath of Texas
> > >
> > > http://www.dptexas.net/
> > >
> >
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Ed McLain
> Sr. Colocation Engineer
> TekLinks / High Speed Solutions
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 205.314.6600
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.6/378 - Release Date: 6/28/2006
>
>



RE: [vchkpw] VpopMail upgrade

2006-06-29 Thread Ed McLain
What backend is vpopmail using for it's storage (cdb/mysql/ldap)?  That
will determine what steps need to be taken.  In most cases however,
moving from one server to another is a fairly painless job as long as
you get your bases covered and there should be no loss in emails or
accounts when doing the upgrade.  For me personally I've moved my
current user base across 4 different servers with only a blip of an
outage while transferring over the current email store and changing the
ip of the new and old boxes.

On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:00 -0500, Austin Jorden wrote:
> Oh I'm sorry, it's still 1.03 that's installed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Austin Jorden
> (972) 284-4909
> Digitalpath of Texas
> http://www.dptexas.net/
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:54 AM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] VpopMail upgrade
> 
> 
> 
> Austin Jorden wrote:
> >
> > I have an older machine that has over 450 email accounts.
> >
> > It has:
> >
> > Vpopmail 4.9.8
> >
> > QMail 1.03
> >
> > No IMAP installed.
> >
> > I need to transfer all this stuff over to a new updated server that has:
> >
> > Vpopmail 5.4.13
> >
> > QMail 2.2.1
> >
> Are you sure you have qmail 2.2.1?
> >
> > QmailAd 1.2.9
> >
> > VQadmin
> >
> > Squirrel Mail
> >
> > However I don't know how-to do this. I do not know the older server's
> > postmaster password. I can change it by using vQadmin; however I can't
> > install it because vpopmail is not up2date. My plan is this:
> >
> > 1.) Update vpopmail
> >
> > 2.) Install vQadmin
> >
> > 3.) Get/change postmaster password
> >
> > Will I loose emails / domains / accounts if I update Vpopmail?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Austin Jorden
> >
> > (972) 284-4909
> >
> > Digitalpath of Texas
> >
> > http://www.dptexas.net/
> >
> 
-- 
Thanks,
Ed McLain
Sr. Colocation Engineer
TekLinks / High Speed Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
205.314.6600


RE: [vchkpw] VpopMail upgrade

2006-06-29 Thread Austin Jorden
Oh I'm sorry, it's still 1.03 that's installed.

Thanks,
Austin Jorden
(972) 284-4909
Digitalpath of Texas
http://www.dptexas.net/


-Original Message-
From: Remo Mattei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:54 AM
To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] VpopMail upgrade



Austin Jorden wrote:
>
> I have an older machine that has over 450 email accounts.
>
> It has:
>
> Vpopmail 4.9.8
>
> QMail 1.03
>
> No IMAP installed.
>
> I need to transfer all this stuff over to a new updated server that has:
>
> Vpopmail 5.4.13
>
> QMail 2.2.1
>
Are you sure you have qmail 2.2.1?
>
> QmailAd 1.2.9
>
> VQadmin
>
> Squirrel Mail
>
> However I don't know how-to do this. I do not know the older server's
> postmaster password. I can change it by using vQadmin; however I can't
> install it because vpopmail is not up2date. My plan is this:
>
> 1.) Update vpopmail
>
> 2.) Install vQadmin
>
> 3.) Get/change postmaster password
>
> Will I loose emails / domains / accounts if I update Vpopmail?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Austin Jorden
>
> (972) 284-4909
>
> Digitalpath of Texas
>
> http://www.dptexas.net/
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [vchkpw] VpopMail upgrade

2006-06-29 Thread Remo Mattei


Austin Jorden wrote:
>
> I have an older machine that has over 450 email accounts.
>
> It has:
>
> Vpopmail 4.9.8
>
> QMail 1.03
>
> No IMAP installed.
>
> I need to transfer all this stuff over to a new updated server that has:
>
> Vpopmail 5.4.13
>
> QMail 2.2.1
>
Are you sure you have qmail 2.2.1?
>
> QmailAd 1.2.9
>
> VQadmin
>
> Squirrel Mail
>
> However I don’t know how-to do this. I do not know the older server’s
> postmaster password. I can change it by using vQadmin; however I can’t
> install it because vpopmail is not up2date. My plan is this:
>
> 1.) Update vpopmail
>
> 2.) Install vQadmin
>
> 3.) Get/change postmaster password
>
> Will I loose emails / domains / accounts if I update Vpopmail?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Austin Jorden
>
> (972) 284-4909
>
> Digitalpath of Texas
>
> http://www.dptexas.net/
>


[vchkpw] VpopMail upgrade

2006-06-29 Thread Austin Jorden








I have an older machine that has over 450
email accounts.

It has:

Vpopmail 4.9.8

QMail   1.03

 

No IMAP installed.

I need to transfer all this stuff over to
a new updated server that has:

Vpopmail 5.4.13

QMail    2.2.1

QmailAd   1.2.9

VQadmin

Squirrel Mail

 

However I don’t know how-to do
this.  I do not know the older server’s postmaster password.   I can
change it by using vQadmin; however I can’t install it because vpopmail
is not up2date.    My plan is this:

 

1.)  
Update vpopmail

2.)  
Install vQadmin

3.)  
Get/change postmaster password

 

Will I loose emails / domains / accounts
if I update Vpopmail?

 

Thanks,

Austin Jorden

(972) 284-4909

Digitalpath of Texas

http://www.dptexas.net/

 

 








smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail upgrade ==> qmail recompile needed ?

2005-10-29 Thread John Simpson

On 2005-10-28, at 1328, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:

On Thursday 27 October 2005 10:57 pm, John Simpson wrote:

On 2005-10-26, at 1949, Rick Macdougall wrote:

Domain Quotas are not going to happen anytime soon I think, the
over head of calculating the quota for a domain of 20K users is
just too much.  If you really need domain quotas, use a separate
user for each domain and use system quotas.  Of course you will
then have to run qmail-smtpd as root.


or make the "vchkpw" binary setuid root, and let qmail-smtpd run as
qmaild (as it was designed.)


but that will break chkuser.


thinking about how chkuser works, that makes sense. i didn't think  
about that because i don't use chkuser.


i've looked at chkuser twice (once over a year ago, and once again a  
few months ago) and i'm not comfortable with having qmail tied that  
closely into vpopmail. that's why i wrote the validrcptto.cdb patch,  
to reject messages which are addressed to non-existent recipients,  
without tying qmail to any one technology (such as vpopmail, or  
courier-authlib.) any system which allows you to generate a list of  
valid addresses can be used to build a cdb file, and my web site has  
a perl script which does this for system and vpopmail accounts.


the weakness of my patch is that it relies on a cdb file which must  
be rebuilt whenever the underlying data changes (i.e. mailboxes or  
domains added or deleted.) however, because it uses a cdb file, the  
recipient checks are done VERY quickly, without having to fork/exec  
any other processes, and the cdb file can be copied out to internet- 
facing "pre-filtering" servers which otherwise would not have any way  
to check recipients.


as i've said before, the various "recipient check" patches each have  
their own strengths and weaknesses... i will admit to being slightly  
biased towards mine, but i don't think any more or less of anybody  
for choosing one of the others. i figure anybody smart enough to  
apply a patch will also be smart enought to choose one based on their  
own needs and the particulars of each patch.


as a separate issue, i'm also not comfortable with the idea of  
running internet-accessible services as root. i did my time running  
sendmail and bind, back before i was introduced to qmail and djbdns,  
and i still have flashbacks to evenings spent rebuilding mail and DNS  
servers because some joker in germany had nothing better to do with  
his time than trash my server.


--
| John M. Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large |
| http://www.jms1.net/   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
--
| Mac OS X proves that it's easier to make UNIX  |
| pretty than it is to make Windows secure.  |
--




PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail upgrade ==> qmail recompile needed ?

2005-10-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thursday 27 October 2005 10:57 pm, John Simpson wrote:
> On 2005-10-26, at 1949, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> > Domain Quotas are not going to happen anytime soon I think, the
> > over head of calculating the quota for a domain of 20K users is
> > just too much.  If you really need domain quotas, use a separate
> > user for each domain and use system quotas.  Of course you will
> > then have to run qmail-smtpd as root.
>
> or make the "vchkpw" binary setuid root, and let qmail-smtpd run as
> qmaild (as it was designed.)

but that will break chkuser.

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In the beginning was The Word and The Word was Content-type: text/plain
  -- The Word of Bob.


pgpph2zOv857t.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail upgrade ==> qmail recompile needed ?

2005-10-27 Thread John Simpson

On 2005-10-26, at 1949, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Domain Quotas are not going to happen anytime soon I think, the  
over head of calculating the quota for a domain of 20K users is  
just too much.  If you really need domain quotas, use a separate  
user for each domain and use system quotas.  Of course you will  
then have to run qmail-smtpd as root.


or make the "vchkpw" binary setuid root, and let qmail-smtpd run as  
qmaild (as it was designed.)


--
| John M. Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large |
| http://www.jms1.net/   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
--
| Mac OS X proves that it's easier to make UNIX  |
| pretty than it is to make Windows secure.  |
--




PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail upgrade ==> qmail recompile needed ?

2005-10-27 Thread John Simpson

On 2005-10-26, at 1902, Szeki - Inc wrote:
If I upgrade vpopmail from an earlier version (say from the same  
mainline eg from 5.4.10 to 5.4.13), than I have to recompile qmail  
- it is using Bill Shupp's 0.8 patch - if it is using chkuser ?


considering that the "chkuser" patch relies on vpopmail, yes.

What other programs is requiring recocmpilation if there is version  
change. (courier imap ? courier authdaemon ?)


anything else that uses vpopmail's code. if you're using courier-imap  
4.x, you won't need to recompile it but you will need to recompile  
the courier-authlib package.


--
| John M. Simpson - KG4ZOW - Programmer At Large |
| http://www.jms1.net/   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
--
| Mac OS X proves that it's easier to make UNIX  |
| pretty than it is to make Windows secure.  |
--




PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail upgrade ==> qmail recompile needed ?

2005-10-26 Thread Rick Macdougall

Szeki - Inc wrote:
If I upgrade vpopmail from an earlier version (say from the same 
mainline eg from 5.4.10 to 5.4.13), than I have to recompile qmail - it 
is using Bill Shupp's 0.8 patch - if it is using chkuser ? What other 
programs is requiring recocmpilation if there is version change. 
(courier imap ? courier authdaemon ?)
 
Whati is the current status of domain  quotas ? Still unusuable ? (or 
There is light at the end of the tunnel ?)
 
Regards,
 
Peter
 


Hi,

courier, qmail-admin, netqmail, anything else that uses libvpopmail 
(that's about it I think)


Domain Quotas are not going to happen anytime soon I think, the over 
head of calculating the quota for a domain of 20K users is just too 
much.  If you really need domain quotas, use a separate user for each 
domain and use system quotas.  Of course you will then have to run 
qmail-smtpd as root.


That's what we do here for those domains that need it.

Regards,

Rick



[vchkpw] vpopmail upgrade ==> qmail recompile needed ?

2005-10-26 Thread Szeki - Inc



If I upgrade 
vpopmail from an earlier version (say from the same mainline eg from 5.4.10 to 
5.4.13), than I have to recompile qmail - it is using Bill Shupp's 0.8 patch - 
if it is using chkuser ? What other programs is requiring recocmpilation if 
there is version change. (courier imap ? courier authdaemon 
?)
 
Whati is the current 
status of domain  quotas ? Still unusuable ? (or There is light at the end 
of the tunnel ?)
 
Regards,
 
Peter
 


Re: [vchkpw] Vpopmail upgrade?

2003-11-21 Thread Tom Collins
On Friday, November 21, 2003, at 03:59  PM, Vitaliy Sholokhov wrote:
a minor bug, perhaps, I've just upgraded vpopmail from 5.2.1 to 5.2.2, 
but
when I login to qmailadmin or vqadmin I still get "vpopmail 5.2.1"
displayed as if that is current version that is being used.
It is the version being used until you recompile qmailadmin and vqadmin.

Any time you rebuild/compile/install vpopmail, you should 
recompile/install qmailadmin, vqadmin, courier-imap, qmail-smtpd (if 
you're using the chkusr patch) and any other program that statically 
links libvpopmail.  Otherwise, those programs will use the code from 
the older version of vpopmail.

--
Tom Collins  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/  Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
Info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/



[vchkpw] Vpopmail upgrade?

2003-11-21 Thread Vitaliy Sholokhov
Hello, guys

a minor bug, perhaps, I've just upgraded vpopmail from 5.2.1 to 5.2.2, but
when I login to qmailadmin or vqadmin I still get "vpopmail 5.2.1"
displayed as if that is current version that is being used.

--