Erik Bourget wrote:
Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Because vpopmail bridges so many divides, it cannot intuit what you want.
It doesn't know if you're using cdb for everything or using MySQL for
everything or whatever unless you tell it. But, wherever possible, it
should be DWIM.
Paul L. Allen wrote:
Erik Bourget writes:
You know, intense as this whole argument is, the fact remains that DWIM
is no substitute for proper documentation.
Let's see, the documentation says vaddaliasdomain original alias.
If you do what the documentation says, it works. If you reverse
The worst one of our clients has managed so far is 13, added in dribs and
drabs of two or three at a time. For one it makes no difference. For
hundreds I'd go the perl script reading a text file route. For twos and
threes the current argument order of vaddaliasdomain is annoying.
Write a
feel too imposing.
Thanks in advance for the patch.
Lu
-Original Message-
From: Paul L. Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:07 PM
To: JB
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Feature request for vaddaliasdomain
You don't read so good
Paul L. Allen wrote:
You don't read so good, do you?
snappy opener, i wonder what prompted this? whiners hate being called
whiners.
you are obviously a person who loves to whine and when not whining,
likes to rage.
am i correct in this? no need to reply, i'm confident in my analysis.
a better
Stop bickering please, common.
Difference between the origional and that what i changed around
Breached# diff vaddaliasdomain.c.backup vaddaliasdomain.c
56c56,57
printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alias_domain
real_domain\n);
---
/* printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options]
Stop bickering please, common.
Difference between the origional and that what i changed around
Breached# diff vaddaliasdomain.c.backup vaddaliasdomain.c
56c56,57
printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options] alias_domain
real_domain\n);
---
/* printf(vaddaliasdomain: usage: [options]
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 03:26, Paul L. Allen wrote:
A bit odd to document,
Damn right. I still haven't figured out a sensible usage message.
I think we should just ignore the old way of calling vaddaliasdomain
in the usage message, in that way new users will adobt the new way of
doing
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 03:46, Paul L. Allen wrote:
I think we should just ignore the old way of calling vaddaliasdomain
in the usage message, in that way new users will adobt the new way of
doing things.
Ummm, that implies that one way is more correct than the other. I do
not believe
