Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin problem (KMM6374095I87L0KM)

2008-06-17 Thread f m
Can someone/anyone explain what this email to the list is, and how it
might have happened?

thanks,

ComputekIE



On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Wachovia Service [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear CUSTOMER,

 Thank you for contacting Wachovia.

 This message is in response to your recent communication, which was
 received on 06/14/2008 and assigned Case ID 28692943.

 I regret the message we received was unclear.  Please send us another
 secure e-mail with additional information regarding your inquiry.  We
 will be happy to assist you in addressing your concerns when we receive
 further details.  You may also call us at the number listed below for
 assistance.

 I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience.

 If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact us via
 e-mail or call 800-950-2296.  Representatives are available to assist
 you 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

 I value your business as a Wachovia customer and look forward to
 continuing to serve your financial needs.  Visit us again at
 wachovia.com.

 Note:  Wachovia requires the use of secure browsers to protect you while
 you access our on-line financial services over the Internet.  However,
 information sent by electronic mail cannot utilize the same standards of
 securing your personal information that secure browsers afford.
 Therefore, do not send confidential information such as account numbers
 or social security numbers through e-mail.

 Sincerely,

 Latoya H



 Original Message Excluded:
 -


 |1525Wach1525|

 



!DSPAM:4857da2632358721114224!



Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin problem (KMM6374095I87L0KM)

2008-06-17 Thread Wouter van der Schagt

Just ignore it and delete it.

- Original Message - 
From: f m [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: vchkpw@inter7.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin problem (KMM6374095I87L0KM)



Can someone/anyone explain what this email to the list is, and how it
might have happened?

thanks,

ComputekIE



On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Wachovia Service [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Dear CUSTOMER,

Thank you for contacting Wachovia.

This message is in response to your recent communication, which was
received on 06/14/2008 and assigned Case ID 28692943.

I regret the message we received was unclear.  Please send us another
secure e-mail with additional information regarding your inquiry.  We
will be happy to assist you in addressing your concerns when we receive
further details.  You may also call us at the number listed below for
assistance.

I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience.

If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact us via
e-mail or call 800-950-2296.  Representatives are available to assist
you 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

I value your business as a Wachovia customer and look forward to
continuing to serve your financial needs.  Visit us again at
wachovia.com.

Note:  Wachovia requires the use of secure browsers to protect you while
you access our on-line financial services over the Internet.  However,
information sent by electronic mail cannot utilize the same standards of
securing your personal information that secure browsers afford.
Therefore, do not send confidential information such as account numbers
or social security numbers through e-mail.

Sincerely,

Latoya H



Original Message Excluded:
-


|1525Wach1525|












!DSPAM:4857dd1632351045216281!



Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin problem (KMM6374095I87L0KM)

2008-06-15 Thread Wachovia Service
Dear CUSTOMER,

Thank you for contacting Wachovia.  

This message is in response to your recent communication, which was 
received on 06/14/2008 and assigned Case ID 28692943.

I regret the message we received was unclear.  Please send us another 
secure e-mail with additional information regarding your inquiry.  We 
will be happy to assist you in addressing your concerns when we receive 
further details.  You may also call us at the number listed below for 
assistance.

I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience.

If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact us via 
e-mail or call 800-950-2296.  Representatives are available to assist 
you 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

I value your business as a Wachovia customer and look forward to 
continuing to serve your financial needs.  Visit us again at 
wachovia.com.

Note:  Wachovia requires the use of secure browsers to protect you while
you access our on-line financial services over the Internet.  However, 
information sent by electronic mail cannot utilize the same standards of
securing your personal information that secure browsers afford.  
Therefore, do not send confidential information such as account numbers 
or social security numbers through e-mail.

Sincerely, 

Latoya H



Original Message Excluded:
-


|1525Wach1525|

!DSPAM:485539e832357219319710!



Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin problem

2008-06-14 Thread Dvorkin Dmitry
as I see, this peace of software wrote using old-style PHP passing 
variables as reference behavior.
I can't make it work too even after some patching and making changes in 
php.ini, i've got an empty accounts list. :(
write your own php code or rewrite this using php-sockets interface to 
vpopmaild


hareram пишет:

Hi

I hav downloaded Vhostadmin
and installed in my webserver as per the INSTALL i have modified
the global.inc

then http://myip/vhostadmin

i get username and password

when i enter with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
password

i am able to login, but later i get
above right hand side mail and logout links

when i click mail, its again going back to login page

how can i use this Vhostadmin to modify the user informaton or create 
users


Hare






--
С уважением,
Дмитрий Солдатов (Dvorkin)


!DSPAM:4853d83a32351795932007!



Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-04-11 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Friday 08 April 2005 07:42 pm, Charles Sprickman wrote:
 On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Ken Jones wrote:
  Since the vpopmail daemon runs under tcpserver the PHP interface can
  run on a seperate machine, as well as solving the PHP permissions
  problem.

 I'm curious, if I want to watch the jabber between vhostadmin and
 vpopmaild what's the proper way to add recordio in a vpopmaild run
 script?

recordio sits between tcpserver and whatever tcpserver is talking to.

just put recordio before your vhostadmin command, and bam, you're all set.

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l
  kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
 GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgppStuhPXn7N.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-04-08 Thread Charles Sprickman
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Ken Jones wrote:
Since the vpopmail daemon runs under tcpserver the PHP interface can
run on a seperate machine, as well as solving the PHP permissions
problem.
I'm curious, if I want to watch the jabber between vhostadmin and 
vpopmaild what's the proper way to add recordio in a vpopmaild run 
script?

Thanks,
Charles
The current development version may be downloaded at:
   http://www.inter7.com/?page=vhostadmin
Or via CVS:
   export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvs
   cvs login   (login with empty password)
   cvs co vhostadmin
We have established a mailing list for development and use of
vhostadmin.  To subscribe, send a blank e-mail message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ken Jones
inter7.com


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin

2005-03-13 Thread Kurt Bigler
on 3/13/05 10:18 AM, YaP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I saw this new package on the website but i can't find vpopmaild daemon,
 there's just the file in the cvs. Is cvs the only way to obtain it?
 
 Thanks in advance

This was covered in the recent thread vhostadmin development release.  The
following message answers your question (but you probably want to look
through the archives for other useful information):


on 3/8/05 12:38 PM, Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tuesday 08 March 2005 1:57 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
 Ken Jones wrote:
 snip
 
 Someone not familiar with LAMP might follow the install doc and stop there,
 
 http://myserver.com/include/global.incopens the cookie jar.
 
 Where does one find the vpopmail daemon? I downloaded a fresh copy of
 5.4.9 and the 5.5.0-devel  and didn't see it. Checked in the contrib dir
 also.
 
 Here is a link to a working vpopmaild tar ball untill we get the
 current devel release working.
 
 http://www.inter7.com/vhostadmin/vpopmail-5.5.3.tar.gz


-Kurt



Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Dave Goodrich
Ken Jones wrote:
vhostadmin is a PHP control panel for site administrators looking
for an easy way to manage their virtual hosting needs via a series
of user-configurable plug-in modules.  Because of this you have the
ability to write and include your own plug-ins.
Although still early in development, we felt it would be good to release
the software to the community to look over and inspect.  Included
is some base API for authentication, communication with the vpopmail
daemon, and some basic event binding inside the mail and vpopmail
modules.  The current development mail module can add a domain via
the vpopmail daemon.
Since the vpopmail daemon runs under tcpserver the PHP interface can
run on a seperate machine, as well as solving the PHP permissions
problem.
The current development version may be downloaded at:
http://www.inter7.com/?page=vhostadmin
Or via CVS:
export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvs
cvs login   (login with empty password)
cvs co vhostadmin
We have established a mailing list for development and use of
vhostadmin.  To subscribe, send a blank e-mail message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Someone not familiar with LAMP might follow the install doc and stop there,
http://myserver.com/include/global.incopens the cookie jar.
Where does one find the vpopmail daemon? I downloaded a fresh copy of 
5.4.9 and the 5.5.0-devel  and didn't see it. Checked in the contrib dir 
also.

Thanks
DAve

--
Dave Goodrich
Systems Administrator
http://www.tls.net
Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker!


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 1:57 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
 Ken Jones wrote:
  vhostadmin is a PHP control panel for site administrators looking
  for an easy way to manage their virtual hosting needs via a series
  of user-configurable plug-in modules.  Because of this you have the
  ability to write and include your own plug-ins.
 
  Although still early in development, we felt it would be good to release
  the software to the community to look over and inspect.  Included
  is some base API for authentication, communication with the vpopmail
  daemon, and some basic event binding inside the mail and vpopmail
  modules.  The current development mail module can add a domain via
  the vpopmail daemon.
 
  Since the vpopmail daemon runs under tcpserver the PHP interface can
  run on a seperate machine, as well as solving the PHP permissions
  problem.
 
  The current development version may be downloaded at:
 
  http://www.inter7.com/?page=vhostadmin
 
  Or via CVS:
 
  export CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvs
  cvs login   (login with empty password)
  cvs co vhostadmin
 
  We have established a mailing list for development and use of
  vhostadmin.  To subscribe, send a blank e-mail message to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Someone not familiar with LAMP might follow the install doc and stop there,

 http://myserver.com/include/global.incopens the cookie jar.

 Where does one find the vpopmail daemon? I downloaded a fresh copy of
 5.4.9 and the 5.5.0-devel  and didn't see it. Checked in the contrib dir
 also.

I checked the current cvs and the vpopmaild code is there, but it was not
in the Makefile.am. I also get a segfault from vadddomain which I'm trying
to track down. 

In the mean time I think we will post a link on the vhostadmin site with
a version that compiles.

Ken


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 1:57 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
 Ken Jones wrote:
snip

 Someone not familiar with LAMP might follow the install doc and stop there,

 http://myserver.com/include/global.incopens the cookie jar.

 Where does one find the vpopmail daemon? I downloaded a fresh copy of
 5.4.9 and the 5.5.0-devel  and didn't see it. Checked in the contrib dir
 also.

Here is a link to a working vpopmaild tar ball untill we get the
current devel release working.

http://www.inter7.com/vhostadmin/vpopmail-5.5.3.tar.gz

Ken


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Dave Goodrich
Ken Jones wrote:
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 1:57 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
snip
Someone not familiar with LAMP might follow the install doc and stop there,
http://myserver.com/include/global.incopens the cookie jar.
Where does one find the vpopmail daemon? I downloaded a fresh copy of
5.4.9 and the 5.5.0-devel  and didn't see it. Checked in the contrib dir
also.

Here is a link to a working vpopmaild tar ball untill we get the
current devel release working.
http://www.inter7.com/vhostadmin/vpopmail-5.5.3.tar.gz
Excellent, thank you.
Before I grab that (might be later this week before I can look at it), 
are there any ideas/concepts for using vpopmaild with a group of 
machines? I'm curious how this can add a domain. Are you able to HUP 
qmail on multiple machines once a domain is added?

Thanks,
DAve

--
Dave Goodrich
Systems Administrator
http://www.tls.net
Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker!


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 2:44 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
 Ken Jones wrote:
  On Tuesday 08 March 2005 1:57 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
 Ken Jones wrote:
 
  snip
 
 Someone not familiar with LAMP might follow the install doc and stop
  there,
 
 http://myserver.com/include/global.incopens the cookie jar.
 
 Where does one find the vpopmail daemon? I downloaded a fresh copy of
 5.4.9 and the 5.5.0-devel  and didn't see it. Checked in the contrib dir
 also.
 
  Here is a link to a working vpopmaild tar ball untill we get the
  current devel release working.
 
  http://www.inter7.com/vhostadmin/vpopmail-5.5.3.tar.gz

 Excellent, thank you.

 Before I grab that (might be later this week before I can look at it),
 are there any ideas/concepts for using vpopmaild with a group of
 machines? I'm curious how this can add a domain. Are you able to HUP
 qmail on multiple machines once a domain is added?

Well, once you connect to the vpopmail daemon on the machine, the
add domain function calls the vpopmail library add domain function
that does the HUP signal to qmail-send.

Ken


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Dave Goodrich
Ken Jones wrote:
snip
Before I grab that (might be later this week before I can look at it),
are there any ideas/concepts for using vpopmaild with a group of
machines? I'm curious how this can add a domain. Are you able to HUP
qmail on multiple machines once a domain is added?

Well, once you connect to the vpopmail daemon on the machine, the
add domain function calls the vpopmail library add domain function
that does the HUP signal to qmail-send.
Understood, but what of the other three machines I have running? They 
all use the same control files. If I add a domain on machine A using 
vpopmail daemon, machine A gets to HUP qmail-send, but I cannot run 
vadddomain again on machines B, C, D. So I must login and run svc -h 
/service/qmail-send manually on machine B, C, and D.

Hmmm, I'm pondering this one. Still liking the idea of qmail and 
vpopmail both in MySQL.

DAve
--
Dave Goodrich
Systems Administrator
http://www.tls.net
Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker!


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 03:35 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
 Ken Jones wrote:

 snip

 Before I grab that (might be later this week before I can look at it),
 are there any ideas/concepts for using vpopmaild with a group of
 machines? I'm curious how this can add a domain. Are you able to HUP
 qmail on multiple machines once a domain is added?
 
  Well, once you connect to the vpopmail daemon on the machine, the
  add domain function calls the vpopmail library add domain function
  that does the HUP signal to qmail-send.

 Understood, but what of the other three machines I have running? They
 all use the same control files. If I add a domain on machine A using
 vpopmail daemon, machine A gets to HUP qmail-send, but I cannot run
 vadddomain again on machines B, C, D. So I must login and run svc -h
 /service/qmail-send manually on machine B, C, and D.

the way I've handled this in the past on customer machines is to have a 'sync' 
script that syncs the control files (set on a cronjob.. run every 5 
minutes..) and it checks timestamps and HUPs/restarts daemons accordingly.

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l
  kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
 GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpoGnljcz4c5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Dave Goodrich
Dave Goodrich wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
snip
Before I grab that (might be later this week before I can look at it),
are there any ideas/concepts for using vpopmaild with a group of
machines? I'm curious how this can add a domain. Are you able to HUP
qmail on multiple machines once a domain is added?
Well, once you connect to the vpopmail daemon on the machine, the
add domain function calls the vpopmail library add domain function
that does the HUP signal to qmail-send.
Understood, but what of the other three machines I have running? They 
all use the same control files. If I add a domain on machine A using 
vpopmail daemon, machine A gets to HUP qmail-send, but I cannot run 
vadddomain again on machines B, C, D. So I must login and run svc -h 
/service/qmail-send manually on machine B, C, and D.

Hmmm, I'm pondering this one. Still liking the idea of qmail and 
vpopmail both in MySQL.

Could a function be added to vpopmaild to *only* rehup qmail-send? This 
could be called from vhostadmin. A config could be added to list 
multiple machines that need a rehup when a domain is added, a php array 
of machines running vpopmaild?

DAve
--
Dave Goodrich
Systems Administrator
http://www.tls.net
Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker!


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Dave Goodrich
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 03:35 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
snip
Before I grab that (might be later this week before I can look at it),
are there any ideas/concepts for using vpopmaild with a group of
machines? I'm curious how this can add a domain. Are you able to HUP
qmail on multiple machines once a domain is added?
Well, once you connect to the vpopmail daemon on the machine, the
add domain function calls the vpopmail library add domain function
that does the HUP signal to qmail-send.
Understood, but what of the other three machines I have running? They
all use the same control files. If I add a domain on machine A using
vpopmail daemon, machine A gets to HUP qmail-send, but I cannot run
vadddomain again on machines B, C, D. So I must login and run svc -h
/service/qmail-send manually on machine B, C, and D.

the way I've handled this in the past on customer machines is to have a 'sync' 
script that syncs the control files (set on a cronjob.. run every 5 
minutes..) and it checks timestamps and HUPs/restarts daemons accordingly.

My control files (some of them) are symlinks to NFS mounted files. I 
could seperate them and run rsync to pull over changes, restarting when 
needed. Hmmm Currently all machines do not run the same control 
files though. mailspool.tls.net is my backup MX and it has entries in 
morercpthosts for all our hosted domains, plus some domains that our 
clients provide primary MX on. So I don't want to rehup all my machines 
if a domain is added to mailspool.

DAve
--
Dave Goodrich
Systems Administrator
http://www.tls.net
Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker!


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 04:06 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
 Understood, but what of the other three machines I have running? They
 all use the same control files. If I add a domain on machine A using
 vpopmail daemon, machine A gets to HUP qmail-send, but I cannot run
 vadddomain again on machines B, C, D. So I must login and run svc -h
 /service/qmail-send manually on machine B, C, and D.
 
  the way I've handled this in the past on customer machines is to have a
  'sync' script that syncs the control files (set on a cronjob.. run every
  5 minutes..) and it checks timestamps and HUPs/restarts daemons
  accordingly.

 My control files (some of them) are symlinks to NFS mounted files. I
 could seperate them and run rsync to pull over changes, restarting when
 needed. 

I would advise doing that anyways since qmail accesses the control directory a 
lot and accessing it across NFS can degrade performance...

 Hmmm Currently all machines do not run the same control 
 files though. mailspool.tls.net is my backup MX and it has entries in
 morercpthosts for all our hosted domains, plus some domains that our
 clients provide primary MX on. So I don't want to rehup all my machines
 if a domain is added to mailspool.

There are only certain control files that require HUP'ing or restarting 
anything... specifically the ones that qmail-send uses.. everything else is 
read on a per-invocation basis (qmail-smtpd, qmail-remote, etc)

locals and rcpthosts are HUP of qmail-send
queuelifetime, bouncefrom, bounceto, doublebounceto, doublebouncehost, me, 
concurrency{local,remote} all require restart of qmail-send.

Note that this is not an exhaustive list of control files that require 
qmail-send to be restarted, they're just what I could think of off the top of 
my head.  Also, if you have any patches (although I don't know of any ..) 
that give qmail-send some extra control files, those may require restarting 
qmail-send.

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 815.776.9465 int'l
  kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet IRC ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail
 GnuPG Key ID: 481BF7E2 ++ jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgprzFxTwbvnm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [vchkpw] vhostadmin development release

2005-03-08 Thread Dave Goodrich
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 04:06 pm, Dave Goodrich wrote:
Understood, but what of the other three machines I have running? They
all use the same control files. If I add a domain on machine A using
vpopmail daemon, machine A gets to HUP qmail-send, but I cannot run
vadddomain again on machines B, C, D. So I must login and run svc -h
/service/qmail-send manually on machine B, C, and D.
the way I've handled this in the past on customer machines is to have a
'sync' script that syncs the control files (set on a cronjob.. run every
5 minutes..) and it checks timestamps and HUPs/restarts daemons
accordingly.
My control files (some of them) are symlinks to NFS mounted files. I
could seperate them and run rsync to pull over changes, restarting when
needed. 

I would advise doing that anyways since qmail accesses the control directory a 
lot and accessing it across NFS can degrade performance...
I have nfs performance to spare, but I understand your thoughts and I am 
in the process of moving away from that setup. I have just gotten around 
to starting on a web tool to enable our support group to manage email.

So I am looking at tieing spamassassin, vpopmail, and our autoresponder 
into one tool set available from a ssl web server. This is why I am so 
curious about where vpopmaild and vdeliver mail are going. They both 
play a bit part in our plans. I don't want to redesign the wheel, nor 
write code that is not useable a month down the road as vpopmail picks 
up new features.


Hmmm Currently all machines do not run the same control 
files though. mailspool.tls.net is my backup MX and it has entries in
morercpthosts for all our hosted domains, plus some domains that our
clients provide primary MX on. So I don't want to rehup all my machines
if a domain is added to mailspool.
There are only certain control files that require HUP'ing or restarting 
anything... specifically the ones that qmail-send uses.. everything else is 
read on a per-invocation basis (qmail-smtpd, qmail-remote, etc)

locals and rcpthosts are HUP of qmail-send
queuelifetime, bouncefrom, bounceto, doublebounceto, doublebouncehost, me, 
concurrency{local,remote} all require restart of qmail-send.
Been there, got those memorized ;^)
DAve
--
Dave Goodrich
Systems Administrator
http://www.tls.net
Get rid of Unwanted Emails...get TLS Spam Blocker!