output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

Hi folks, I promised I'd keep the list in the loop and share the important stuff from the vcs-pkg BoF discussion that took place on Thursday morning at DebConf9 in Caceres. Basically, on Thursday we tried to identify "work packages", or entities that we need to work on. The idea is to create webp

Re: output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

martin f krafft wrote: >The workflows I know currently are: my topgit workflow, Mehdi's >quilt workflow, and Guido's git-buildpackage approach. There my >be others. Aren't Mehdi and Guido basically doing the same thing? From what I understand, the only difference is that Guido uses g

Re: output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

On Tue, Aug 04 2009, Frédéric Brière wrote: > martin f krafft wrote: >>The workflows I know currently are: my topgit workflow, Mehdi's >>quilt workflow, and Guido's git-buildpackage approach. There my >>be others. I am pretty sure I had sent my own work-flows on -- complete

Re: Using quilt to store patches

Guido Günther wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:52:42AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > 1. due to the rebasing, it's not possible to work with other people, > >unless everyone maintains their own patch queue. > > Not true. You just have to agree beforehand what branches do keep the > patch

Re: Using quilt to store patches

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 05:25:06PM +, Frédéric Brière wrote: > Guido Günther wrote: > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:52:42AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > > > 1. due to the rebasing, it's not possible to work with other people, > > >unless everyone maintains their own patch queue. > > > >

Re: output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

also sprach Manoj Srivastava [2009.08.04.1859 +0200]: > > martin f krafft wrote: > >>The workflows I know currently are: my topgit workflow, Mehdi's > >>quilt workflow, and Guido's git-buildpackage approach. There my > >>be others. > > I am pretty sure I had sent my own work-

Re: output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:37:46PM +, Frédéric Brière wrote: > martin f krafft wrote: > >The workflows I know currently are: my topgit workflow, Mehdi's > >quilt workflow, and Guido's git-buildpackage approach. There my > >be others. > > Aren't Mehdi and Guido basically doing the

Re: output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

Guido Günther wrote: > > Aren't Mehdi and Guido basically doing the same thing? From what I > > understand, the only difference is that Guido uses git-rebase, while > > Mehdi manually applies the old patches to a new branch (which is exactly > > what git-rebase does). > > I think they're pretty s

Re: output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

On Tue, Aug 04 2009, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Manoj Srivastava [2009.08.04.1859 +0200]: >> > martin f krafft wrote: >> >>The workflows I know currently are: my topgit workflow, Mehdi's >> >>quilt workflow, and Guido's git-buildpackage approach. There my >> >>be others. >>

Re: output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

martin f krafft writes: > 1. Add the current set of workflows to our website. > >It would be great if the currently "accepted" set of workflows >were to be summarised directly on the webpage, so that we can >"officialise" them and deprecate all the others floating around. > >The w

Re: output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

Guido Günther a écrit : > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:37:46PM +, Frédéric Brière wrote: >> martin f krafft wrote: >>>The workflows I know currently are: my topgit workflow, Mehdi's >>>quilt workflow, and Guido's git-buildpackage approach. There my >>>be others. >> Aren't Mehdi and G

Re: output from the vcs-pkg BoF @DebConf9

Russ Allbery wrote: > http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/debian/git.html If I'm not mistaken, this sounds very much like Manoj's workflow: feature branches that get merged into an integration branch. Manoj, would you agree? -- revision 1.17.2.7 date: 2001/05/31 21:32:44; author: branden;