On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
wrote:
> On 24.02.2010 02:06, VDR User wrote:
>> ...
>> - VDR reporting incorrect runtime in h264 recordings. Klaus has
>> worked on this and it's _much_ better now. If the runtime is
>> incorrect, it's usually only off by up to +10 minutes or s
On 24.02.2010 02:06, VDR User wrote:
> ...
> - VDR reporting incorrect runtime in h264 recordings. Klaus has
> worked on this and it's _much_ better now. If the runtime is
> incorrect, it's usually only off by up to +10 minutes or so, not
> several hours as it used to be.
Do you have a recording
On 25 February 2010 18:44, Lucian Muresan wrote:
> On 25.02.2010 16:27, Adrian C. wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
>>
>>> However I have seen where the media player option within VDR is not
>>> needed if you running something like XBMC as another front-end. I
>>> might be lo
On 25.02.2010 16:27, Adrian C. wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
>
>> However I have seen where the media player option within VDR is not
>> needed if you running something like XBMC as another front-end. I
>> might be looking into enna http://enna.geexbox.org/ soon, which i
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Theunis Potgieter wrote:
> However I have seen where the media player option within VDR is not
> needed if you running something like XBMC as another front-end. I
> might be looking into enna http://enna.geexbox.org/ soon, which is
> similar concept as XBMC and uses xine-li
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Luca Olivetti wrote:
>> It will not be replaced before the HDTV VDR is mature. The biggest
>> problem is that my eyes do not like the picture quality of current LCDs.
>
> Try to look at plasma then, or, if you're really patient, wait for oled.
One of my tv's is a
En/na Oliver Endriss ha escrit:
It will not be replaced before the HDTV VDR is mature. The biggest
problem is that my eyes do not like the picture quality of current LCDs.
Try to look at plasma then, or, if you're really patient, wait for oled.
Bye
--
Luca
___
On 24 February 2010 09:47, Halim Sahin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am using the cvs version already.
> You are right, the cuttingmark problem has been fixed.
> But sometimes i see the broken behaviour when using the pc keyboard for
> cutting and mooving marks quickly.
> The other mentioned things are probl
Hi,
I am using the cvs version already.
You are right, the cuttingmark problem has been fixed.
But sometimes i see the broken behaviour when using the pc keyboard for
cutting and mooving marks quickly.
The other mentioned things are problems of the current cvs.
BR.
Halim
Hi,
Halim Sahin wrote:
Unfortunately softdevice development seems dead so i switched some
months ago to xineliboutput.
at first I would like to say thank you a lot to all VDR developer
especially to Klaus!
VDR is a tool I cannot live without it.
I upgraded my xineliboutput this weekend to
Hi,
the xineliboutput guys are doing a great job with the plugin and I am
almost hapy with it.
I think the better approach was the softdevice plugin which was more
easy to install and depends only on libavcodec.
The xinelib is a big library and many plugins and other output devices
etc are not nee
On 24 February 2010 15:37, VDR User wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>> True it's a problem with xineliboutput, but VDR is useless for HD
>> without any HD output device, and xineliboutput is by far the most
>> used one. Talking about VDR HD completeness without cons
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> True it's a problem with xineliboutput, but VDR is useless for HD
> without any HD output device, and xineliboutput is by far the most
> used one. Talking about VDR HD completeness without considering it is
> wrong IMHO.
I'm not convinced xi
On 24 February 2010 14:30, VDR User wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
>> On 24 February 2010 11:06, VDR User wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
It will not be replaced before the HDTV VDR is mature. The biggest
problem is tha
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> On 24 February 2010 11:06, VDR User wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
>>> It will not be replaced before the HDTV VDR is mature. The biggest
>>> problem is that my eyes do not like the picture quality of curre
On 24 February 2010 11:06, VDR User wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
>> It will not be replaced before the HDTV VDR is mature. The biggest
>> problem is that my eyes do not like the picture quality of current LCDs.
>
> Just curious what you think VDR lacks or is uns
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Oliver Endriss wrote:
> It will not be replaced before the HDTV VDR is mature. The biggest
> problem is that my eyes do not like the picture quality of current LCDs.
Just curious what you think VDR lacks or is unstable in regarding
hdtv? The only current problems
Paul Menzel wrote:
> > I just checked my archives and found that VDR replaced my analogue SAT
> > receiver around July 2002. From the beginning it was the most useful
> > linux application I ever tried. And it is still the only one which made
> > it into the living room.
>
> Just out of curiosity,
Dear Oliver,
Am Montag, den 22.02.2010, 23:40 +0100 schrieb Oliver Endriss:
[…]
> I just checked my archives and found that VDR replaced my analogue SAT
> receiver around July 2002. From the beginning it was the most useful
> linux application I ever tried. And it is still the only one which ma
19 matches
Mail list logo
