Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-20 Thread Artur Skawina
VDR User wrote: I've recorded/watched a lot of tv in the last couple days and so far I haven't noticed any problems with this patch. I am currently using v3 (the patch I attached to my previous post) with vdr-1.5.2. Do you know how large the buffers usually grow? If you haven't reduced vdrs

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-20 Thread VDR User
On 5/20/07, Artur Skawina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VDR User wrote: I've recorded/watched a lot of tv in the last couple days and so far I haven't noticed any problems with this patch. I am currently using v3 (the patch I attached to my previous post) with vdr-1.5.2. Do you know how large

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-20 Thread Artur Skawina
VDR User wrote: On 5/20/07, Artur Skawina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: VDR User wrote: I've recorded/watched a lot of tv in the last couple days and so far I haven't noticed any problems with this patch. I am currently using v3 (the patch I attached to my previous post) with vdr-1.5.2. Do

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-20 Thread VDR User
On 5/20/07, Artur Skawina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks. It seems that 648k was the largest size ever used for a buffer, which is less than 1/3 of the full size (2M for Result,Transfer and TS). The Recorder buffer was typically at 5% of its max size, ie 300k instead of 5M. No overflows w/ v3

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-17 Thread derblubber
I just wanted to give some feedback on this, im using the patch on my vdr 1.4.7 and it workes without problems for now. Good work, thanks. Dortje In case anyone is having trouble, here's an attached patch of v3 for vdr-1.5.2.

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-17 Thread VDR User
I've recorded/watched a lot of tv in the last couple days and so far I haven't noticed any problems with this patch. I am currently using v3 (the patch I attached to my previous post) with vdr-1.5.2. ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-15 Thread Jaroslaw Swierczynski
2007/5/15, VDR User [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In case anyone is having trouble, here's an attached patch of v3 for vdr-1.5.2. You mean 1.4 :) Thanks. -- Jaroslaw Swierczynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.archlinux.org | www.juvepoland.com ___ vdr mailing list

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-15 Thread Artur Skawina
Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: It seems your patch is against VDR 1.5.x. Could you please backport it to VDR 1.4.x? actually it's vs 1.4.6, but applies to 1.5.2 too. ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-15 Thread Jaroslaw Swierczynski
2007/5/15, VDR User [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No, I mean vdr-1.5.2. Artur said he had attached a patch to his post but there was no attachment and since copy paste the patch from his post was causing problems for some reason, I patched a vanilla vdr-1.5.2 (which is what I use) by hand. If it

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-14 Thread Jaroslaw Swierczynski
It seems your patch is against VDR 1.5.x. Could you please backport it to VDR 1.4.x? -- Jaroslaw Swierczynski [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.archlinux.org | www.juvepoland.com ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org

Re: [vdr] [PATCH] Auto sized ringbuffers v3

2007-05-14 Thread VDR User
In case anyone is having trouble, here's an attached patch of v3 for vdr-1.5.2. diff -ruN vdr-1.5.2-orig/dvbdevice.c vdr-1.5.2/dvbdevice.c --- vdr-1.5.2-orig/dvbdevice.c 2007-05-14 14:58:29.0 -0700 +++ vdr-1.5.2/dvbdevice.c 2007-05-14 15:22:50.0 -0700 @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@