- Original Message -
| From: "Assaf Muller"
| To: "Dan Kenigsberg"
| Cc: "Peter V. Saveliev" , vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org,
"Giuseppe Vallarelli"
| , "michal skrivanek"
| Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:00:49 AM
|
indeed we need to understand more about the source vdsm and how
its VMs were created.
- Original Message -
> From: "Assaf Muller"
> To: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:00:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [v
3 4:41:24 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] Migration regression on master
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 02:13:02PM +0200, Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
> On 05/29/2013 07:17 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:54:45AM -0400, Giuseppe Vallarelli wrote:
> >> | - Original
>>| | To: "Michal Skrivanek"
> >>| | Cc: "vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Development"
> >>| |
> >>| | Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:12:47 PM
> >>| | Subject: Re: [vdsm] Migration regression on master
> >>| |
> >>
| Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:12:47 PM
| | Subject: Re: [vdsm] Migration regression on master
| |
| | As you can see in a previous patch set I checked if the alias attribute
| | exists instead of assuming it exists.
| | I then changed my mind with Dan's blessing, and decided to assume it doe
May 23, 2013 2:12:47 PM
> | | Subject: Re: [vdsm] Migration regression on master
> | |
> | | As you can see in a previous patch set I checked if the alias attribute
> | | exists instead of assuming it exists.
> | | I then changed my mind with Dan's blessing, and decided to assum
| - Original Message -
| | From: "Assaf Muller"
| | To: "Michal Skrivanek"
| | Cc: "vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Development"
| |
| | Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:12:47 PM
| | Subject: Re: [vdsm] Migration regression on master
| |
| | As you can
uot;Michal Skrivanek"
To: "Vinzenz Feenstra" , "Assaf Muller"
Cc: "vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Development"
, "Dan Kenigsberg"
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:56:22 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] Migration regression on master
On May 22, 2013, at 10:14
On May 22, 2013, at 10:14 , Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During the verification of the refactoring in VDSM (libvirtvm + vm == vm) we
> have encountered some issue.
> There seems to be a regression on master branch regarding device aliases.
>
> On the target machine _updateDevicesDomxmlC
Hi,
During the verification of the refactoring in VDSM (libvirtvm + vm ==
vm) we have encountered some issue.
There seems to be a regression on master branch regarding device aliases.
On the target machine _updateDevicesDomxmlCache accesses dev.alias
without the attribute being present.
Thi
10 matches
Mail list logo
