[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-03-01 Thread Cote289
Not to dig up this old thread, but I've been pondering it the past few days and wanted to add my thoughts First, I'm sorry that you couldn't find any pertinent information on DivX on DivX.com. That's terrible and something we struggle with and aim to fix. DivX.com has become a hub of many

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-03-01 Thread Steve Watkins
Thanks for your post. What does 'open platform' actually mean? You talk about people watching content from the web on their TV, and this is indeed an important development. But theres a lot of competition in this young area, and much variation in what technologies are used. You are up against

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-03-01 Thread Steve Watkins
Ahar in regards to TV I see theres a television that can stream DivX content from a computer, which is an interesting start: http://www.divx.com/products/hw/detail.php?p=363 Random and possibly rubbish thoughts on how DivX can increase its territory in the new online video scene... Obviously

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-03-01 Thread Cote289
Open platform means you don’t have to buy an apple product to play the content you purchased. We aren’t a closed system. You can buy a Sony DVD player, a Philips portable player, a Pioneer in car receiver, an HP TV, a Samsung phone. We want to open up the choices that the user has as to

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-03-01 Thread Steve Watkins
Thanks, that makes sense. I certainly agree that there are numerous differnt profiles of mpeg4 and h264 which are confusing to people. If someone came along and wrapped up a series of mpeg4/h264 profile, resolution, bitrate etc specs, and gave them nice straightforward names and logos to go with

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-03-01 Thread Cote289
In the DRM landscape it works like this. Apple media = iPod or AppleTV, MS media = Zune or Xbox, DivXmedia = Sony, Philiphs, JVC, LG, Pioneer, etc. pick one. And yes we are in the same space as the others. We've been selling content with independent content producers for 6 years now

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread JV
I don''t want to get into a commercial here, but just trow out some details. DivX is based on the h.263 standard. The ipod can decode h.263, but requires it to comply to the Apple standards. On the other hand, DivX is integrated into a lot of devices as a feature on products (phillips, Sony,

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread heytobey
Can someone provide a simpler answer to why we would want to use the DivX codec instead of mpg4 or any other? I'm just not understanding this DivX thing but I'm constanting hearing some buzz about it. Thanks for the help, Tobey --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, JV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Steve Watkins
If for some reason you werent happy with either the process or the results of your current choice of video encoding, or if you had viewers asking for a divx-compatible version of your videos to play on their divx certified devices, or if there was something you really liked about divzx video

Re: [videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Rupert
Jon, Thanks for that. I tell you one thing you could do which would help your cause a lot. Provide a simple explanation on your site of why people posting online video should use DivX. Specifically with regard to my concerns below: I must be stupid, but I spent hours today - HOURS -

Re: [videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Paul Knight
sometimes poeople talk shit in this group, some others who try to help you get ignored Paul On 23 Feb 2007, at 18:02, Rupert wrote: Jon, Thanks for that. I tell you one thing you could do which would help your cause a lot. Provide a simple explanation on your site of why people posting

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Steve Watkins
Historically when talking about divx files, they were .avi files and the actual compression was mpeg4 of their own blend. I believe the audio was mp3, dont know if they have changed that now, may be a problem for some hardware thats expecting AAC. Anyway in recent years they have promoted their

Re: [videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Rupert
Paul, Not sure I understand the context of your comment, but i'm hoping you don't think i was ignoring your help because we already corresponded on this - you were most helpful, I just haven't quite got to the bottom of the DivX conundrum, and was mystified that there was no comprehensible

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread JV
Rupert, This is precisely the type of email that helps us. As for complicated upgrades, If they are on Democracy, no. Fireant should be fine also. For other people, the complication varies depending on the implementation. FFMpeg, VLC playback DivX. Also, installs can be done with javascript, so

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Steve Watkins
Oops I keep typo-ing the word DivX, their file format is .divx not the mangled .divzx I said in previous post. Here is more general waffle from me about file formats, where we are right now: h264 was the last great technical leap in video quality/encoding issues, and the last 2 years have been a

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Steve Watkins
Interoperability is also not about downplaying the significance of incompatibility with popular devices that have not chosen to participate in your certification program. Despite all my waffle in the previous posts, Im reasonably confident that right now I could create an .mp4 with mpeg4 or h264

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Heath
I watch/listen to most of my vlogs and podcasts on my Creative Zen M.it converts almost all formats, although it does seem to have a problem with Paul's here lately. Anyway yes there are other devices that people use to watch video.I for one really like the Zen, it plays a number of

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Steve Watkins
Bea with me whilst I attempt to use 3ivx to help explain the mpeg4 compatibility issues that are at the heart of my wafflings. 3ivx is software that can encode and decode mpeg4. Its encoder was considered to be quite a bit nicer than the Apple one that comes with quicktime, and so it was

[videoblogging] Re: DivX??

2007-02-23 Thread Steve Watkins
Cheers, yeah thats the other way to handle the mess that I have presented in my wafflings, for enlightened device manufacturers to pack in a huge range of supported formats (not too practical in some cases though), or to bundle software that takes care of conversion. It didnt take Sony and Apple

[videoblogging] Re: DivX has gone web!!

2006-03-05 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, chrlshogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This week Divx has posted a web Player Plug-in the works in most browsers it features 5.1 sourond sound, HD, full screen or windowed with a right click auto save and more. Also they have put up a HTML generator to

[videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug

2005-12-09 Thread Steve Watkins
Cheers :) My impression of things is probably a bit wrong, Im probably underestimating the number of DivX certified players etc that exist. And yes when thinking of videoblogging, Im not thinking of the billions of legacy files that consumers want to play, indeed Im avoiding talking about that

RE: [videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug

2005-12-09 Thread Jim Vinson
@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Watkins Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:12 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug Cheers :) My impression of things is probably a bit wrong, Im probably underestimating the number of DivX certified players

[videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug

2005-12-08 Thread Steve Watkins
As I understand things, there are 2 technical compatibility issues which prevent DivX from being of interest to most people interested in videoblogging and similar activities, like the general explosion of any kind of internet video. To be of interest it needs to be able to be progressively

[videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug

2005-12-08 Thread Steve Watkins
Oops sorry I forgot the link to the divx forum post that gave me the idea .mp4 support is strongly resisted, though forums arent necessarily the best guide and I havent actually had a chance to try their latest software yet... http://tinyurl.com/au4s5 To be fair there are still some reasons why

[videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug

2005-12-08 Thread Steve Watkins
Wahey, cheers Jim. Perhaps there is more hope than I thought that DivX will rethink their strategy after seeing the ipod friends appear on the scene. Its perfectly possible I suppose to offer options in DivX to create standard mp4 files for use with ipods etc, as well as maintaining options to

RE: [videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug

2005-12-08 Thread Jim Vinson
: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:17 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug Oops sorry I forgot the link to the divx forum post that gave me the idea .mp4 support is strongly resisted, though forums arent necessarily the best guide and I havent

RE: [videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug

2005-12-08 Thread Jim Vinson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Watkins Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:24 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: DivX - Shameless Plug Wahey, cheers Jim. Perhaps there is more hope than I thought that DivX will rethink their strategy after seeing

RE: [videoblogging] Re: divX and apple?

2005-10-24 Thread Jim Vinson
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: [videoblogging] Re: divX and apple? So, is divx not available for the mac (for future reference)? http://www.divx.com/divx/play/download/ ... Richard Version 6 hasn't been released yet for the Mac AFAIK. See http://www.divx.com/divx/mac/ To get

[videoblogging] Re: divX and apple?

2005-10-23 Thread Chris Nolan.ca
So, is divx not available for the mac (for future reference)? http://www.divx.com/divx/play/download/ ... Richard Version 6 hasn't been released yet for the Mac AFAIK. See http://www.divx.com/divx/mac/ To get the version 5 which I haven't had any problems codec wise with. Chris

[videoblogging] Re: DivX

2005-09-29 Thread Susan
(well that didn't last long) ;) Susan --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DivX appear to be offering a 1-day special on their Create bundle for Windows users, might be worth checking out... URL: http://www.divx.com/anniversaryoffer/