usually i stay out of these talks these days but this one...
Most can not be broadcast on community TV because they
continually use copyrighted content (music) in their productions.
That is bad teaching, not a bad law
I don't know about that. Have you ever taught a video
class? Teaching
duncan wrote:
usually i stay out of these talks these days but this one...
I suffer the same problems as Adrian (plus I teach video classes
regularly)...
-but in terms of working creatively I've never found it prohibitive, ...
sampling of other material is one method, but not using it
ituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280
- Original Message -
From:
Aimee Buyea
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 5:09
PM
Subject: [videoblogging] my video got
taken off archive
well i guess my work on gender issues is a litt
] my video got taken off archive/x-tad-bigger
well i guess my work on gender issues is a little too
provocative.
Dear Patron:
You recently uploaded an item to one of our
collections. Curators had
to remove it, possibly due to one of the following
reasons:
-Rights status unclear
-Rights status
OK, since you brought it up - it must be saidthe best US Appelate
Court opinion ever - Mattel, Inc vs. MCA Records, Inc. for trademark
infringement on their Barbie mark and the counterclaim by MCA for
defmation...in the US 9th Circuit...in the opinion of the court, Judge
Kozinski writes...
If
Well, the way I understand Our Media works, it's volunteer moderators
who flag potential copyright-suspicious vids for later attorney review.
In other words, let's find out why the vid was pulled directly from
some moderator's mouth, and furthermore, invite an attorney to address
this.
Don't
i find it had to believe we would get our money's worth
Jan McLaughlin wrote:
Well, the way I understand Our Media works, it's volunteer moderators
who flag potential copyright-suspicious vids for later attorney review.
In other words, let's find out why the vid was pulled directly from
some
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:09:29 +0100, Aimee Buyea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://onegirloneworld.blogspot.com/2005/11/warning-sites-linked-contain-adult.html
I don't know whether I should laugh or cry. Barbie Too Hot For Internet
Archive.
- Andreas
--
URL:http://www.solitude.dk/
Commentary
Barbie is notoriously jealous of her image. Nothing to do with
provocative at all.
Jan
--
It isn't done alone. Pay more.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ - education
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion
http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound
http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com -
I'm guessing it might have more to do with the copywritten music than
Barbie. My daughter Dylan has had a video on the archive for a while
now with Barbies in it.
http://dylanverdi.com/index.php/2005/03/19/toys-of-our-lives/
-Verdi
--
Me: http://michaelverdi.com
RD:
Does it make all of these services (incl. iTunes) unprofessional that
they pull anything with copyrighted content with first checking if the
content has been liscensed?On 11/29/05, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm guessing it might have more to do with the copywritten music than
Barbie.
around the 30/11/05 Ronen mentioned about Re: [videoblogging] my
video got taken off archive that:
Does it make all of these services (incl. iTunes) unprofessional
that they pull anything with copyrighted content with first checking
if the content has been liscensed?
not sure the tone
On 11/30/05, Adrian Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
around the 30/11/05 Ronen mentioned about Re: [videoblogging] my
video got taken off archive that:
Does it make all of these services (incl. iTunes) unprofessional
that they pull anything with copyrighted content with first checking
13 matches
Mail list logo
