On 11/30/05, Adrian Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
around the 30/11/05 Ronen mentioned about Re: [videoblogging] my
video got taken off archive that:
>Does it make all of these services (incl. iTunes) unprofessional
>that they pull anything with copyrighted content with first checking
>if the content has been liscensed?

whoopsie -- without checking

not sure the tone of that, but no, it makes them professional :-)

you always indicate (must indicate) licencing information in the
credits, if you don't have a licence to use it, then you can't.

ourmedia has a great system for taggin used / 'remixed' media

There
is an enormous amount of good video made in my home city (Melbourne)
in schools. Most can not be broadcast on community TV because they
continually use copyrighted content (music) in their productions.
That is bad teaching, not a bad law

I don't know about that.  Have you ever taught a video class?  Teaching the medium to either filmmakers or musicians becomes prohibitive without mixing up existing materials.

The Kuleshov Workshop basically created modern montage by re-using D.W. Griffith's footage.

(copyright law is stuffed, but
the principle is fine).

The principle is great, within a medium.  Once you leave the source medium, realistically it is more like a 'cover' within the same medium, and limiting its use in the same manner causes many problems.  Not the least of which, I can attest, is to classes at Universities.

--
cheers
Adrian Miles
this email is bloggable [ ] ask first [ ] private [x]
hypertext.RMIT <URL:http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/admin/briefEmail.html >


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS






SPONSORED LINKS
Individual Fireant Typepad
Use


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to