Re: [videoblogging] Yet another NYT article on vlogging

2005-12-11 Thread Kath O'Donnell
just a question: if vlogging is personal media and different to mainstream/traditional media, why is it that people get excited when they're mentioned in mainstream/traditional media? just the promotional aspect or something else? YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group

Re: [videoblogging] Yet another NYT article on vlogging

2005-12-11 Thread Paul Knight
Hi Kath,I suppose all us vloggers want to be loved andwant to see our videos out there, we also want others to join so that we always have fresh content to explore and enjoy, so it follows that everyone should see what we make and by spreading it on the mainstream we get more viewer and

Re: [videoblogging] Yet another NYT article on vlogging

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Garfield
FREE WEBLOG NEVER EXPIRING LINK http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/11/arts/television/11mack.html?pagewanted=2ei=5090en=902af87c8ba6ddf4ex=1291957200partner=rssuserlandemc=rss> http://tinyurl.com/cm3y7> On Dec 10, 2005, at 7:41 PM, Markus Sandy wrote: Congrats to Charlene, Rocketboom, Verdi,

Re: [videoblogging] Yet another NYT article on vlogging

2005-12-11 Thread T.Whid
Josh,Your response to a silly journalist laziness (flogging a stereotype) isn't ingratitude, it's common sense.On 12/11/05, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am happy that My vlog was mentioned in the video Podcast article...I am happy that my picture wound up on there too...However I am

[videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread mmcallen
I agree- This is insane. Suspending them over this is political BS. m --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Pulecio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A parody video that features uniformed and plainclothes San Francisco

[videoblogging] Newbie

2005-12-11 Thread Rachel
Hi, I am new at this, but have started to take it seriously. I have no choice, I am married to PJKproductions. Anyway, work to date, I have two vlogs posted on my blogspot at Alternativekitten.blogspot.com. I am now on blip.tv as alternativekitten, and can also be seen on Daily Motion where I

[videoblogging] Bay Area Meetup

2005-12-11 Thread mmcallen
I wondered if anyone in the Bay Area wouldlike to coem to a meetup if I started one Hit me up offline. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back!

Re: [videoblogging] Newbie

2005-12-11 Thread Markus Sandy
way to go Rachel! btw, i think you may need to turn on smartcasting in feedburner to get your xml feed to work properly in fireant or itunes (both fireant and itunes give an error at the moment indicating no media enclosures) http://feeds.feedburner.com/Alternativekitten Markus Rachel

Re: [videoblogging] Newbie

2005-12-11 Thread Markus Sandy
or it may have to do with the dailymotion "blogkey" looks like you have to tell it that feedburner is a valid site or something (I have not used dailymotion yet, but i assume it has a feature to protect you from deep linking perhaps?) when i bring up your feedburner feed in firefox i see a

[videoblogging] RSS Subscriptions + Email

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Sullivan
Hi.I'm interested to know what people think about having new blog posts/rss items from feeds/channels that you subscribe to be forwarded to your email account with the subject as the title and content with any rss enclosures listed in the message. Second, gmail users take notice of the new

Re: [videoblogging] Newbie

2005-12-11 Thread Rachel Knight
It is no use dragging and dropping, because I am using the free vlog link, but Paul is going to help me to fix this.  This is one of the techy bits I don't understand yet, give me a chance, I am still a beginner. RachelOn 11 Dec 2005, at 18:03, Markus Sandy wrote: or it may have to do with the

[videoblogging] Yo Ho!

2005-12-11 Thread Christopher Weagel
Capt Dale originally ran on Human Dog in 2003 when no one was watching. It returns now in video blog format for easy consumption: http://www.human-dog.com/captdale Subscribe to the Main Human Dog Feed to get everything Human Dog makes: http://feeds.feedburner.com/human-dog/wDjj As you were.

Re: [videoblogging] Newbie

2005-12-11 Thread Markus Sandy
no problem, we're here to help too if you need loved first video http://alternativekitten.blogspot.com/2005/10/adventure-of-dog-grimm.html Rachel Knight wrote: It is no use dragging and dropping, because I am using the free vlog link, but Paul is going to help me to fix this. This is

Re: [videoblogging] Yo Ho!

2005-12-11 Thread David Meade
Ah but to have access to the Human-Dog archives ... you should run a willie-wonka style contest for a chance to visit the Human-Dog studios. :-) - Dave -- http://www.DavidMeade.com On 12/11/05, Christopher Weagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Capt Dale originally ran on Human Dog in 2003 when no

Re: [videoblogging] RSS Subscriptions + Email

2005-12-11 Thread Ted Tagami
I don't like it. Web Clips shows you news headlines, Gmail tips, blogs, any RSS and Atom feed, relevant sponsored links, and more. They are asking permission to spam us, even AFTER we set our feeds up. I disabled mine. On 12/11/05, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi.I'm

[videoblogging] High def resolutions on the ipod

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
Howdy all,I thought some of you might find this interesting.It turns out the video ipod will support videos up to 720 pixels wide in mp4, not just the 420x420 that apple reported. What's more when you play these videos back on your TV or display using the AV cable it does actually play them at

Re: [videoblogging] Yo Ho!

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
:) On Dec 11, 2005, at 1:18 PM, Christopher Weagel wrote: Capt Dale originally ran on Human Dog in 2003 when no one was watching. It returns now in video blog format for easy consumption: http://www.human-dog.com/captdale Subscribe to the Main Human Dog Feed to get everything Human Dog

Re: [videoblogging] Bay Area Meetup

2005-12-11 Thread Ted Tagami
There was a Current TV Meetup.com group that morphed into the Bay Area Media Makers. They meet in San Francisco. Josh Wolf is heading it up. I believe the next meeting is on December 21st.On 12/11/05, mmcallen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wondered if anyone in the Bay Area wouldlike to coem

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Randolfe Wicker
I really had trouble deciding how to vote on the police video. I would have probably voted "amusing" or "harmless" or even "mildly offensive" except I was really troubled by the piece where the cop talked about being born mean. I actually voted "shocking" (a minority) for that reason. I

Re: [videoblogging] Yo Ho!

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
:) x 2 much love. I hope I get that golden ticket. Will I get a tour Sara's magical house? Can we visit the magical wonderland of walgreensland... how about the post apocalyptic wonderland (that looks eerily similar to detroit)? Will I get to meet the Mr Weagels himself? What about the

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread teaspace
If any vlogger or budding amateur filmmaker produces and posts on their website humourous/offensive/questionable videos of their workplace and colleagues, in uniform and featuring prominently the corporate logo or public brand, isn't it obviously a recipe for trouble? Try it at your day job

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
OK. Fist off... They get all uptight about this home movie and yet Cops is just fine? That's B.S. i think cops has done far worse for the image of police than anything... that and showing up in cars only when there is trouble... It's only years of getting back out there on foot and

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:53:59 +0100, teaspace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If any vlogger or budding amateur filmmaker produces and posts on their website humourous/offensive/questionable videos of their workplace and colleagues, in uniform and featuring prominently the corporate logo or public

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
Eric, some people might take this the wrong way, but you're the Heidi Fleiss of video blogging. On Dec 9, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Eric Rice wrote: I think you're being pre-coffee persnickety. Heh. I mean this morning I sorta told a big name sponsor 'no deal' since it wasn't on my terms. I have no

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread teaspace
Privacy is dead. Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote: On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:53:59 +0100, teaspace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If any vlogger or budding amateur filmmaker produces and posts on their website humourous/offensive/questionable videos of their workplace and colleagues, in uniform and

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:21:04 +0100, teaspace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Privacy is dead. Regurgitated one-liners are useless. -- URL:http://www.solitude.dk/ Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair

Re: [videoblogging] Some rules to vlog by.

2005-12-11 Thread Joan Khoo
Don't worry too much about what others think. You can't please everybody. Worry about copyright and trademark infrigement. You can't be too careful. Carry a camera everywhere and annoy everybody with it. You'll never know when you get the best film clip. Don't neglect your

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
2006, the year I sold out Sorry, just my personal goal. In a final coup d'etat I'm want to get a contract with a hollywood studio. I want to have a deal inked to produce a movie on my media pyramid scheme, much like startup.com before the bubble on this thing bursts. We're going to sell

Re: [videoblogging] 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread Joshua Kinberg
2006 will be the year when we finally get a terminology that distinguishes between stuff like Rocketboom.com and Charlene scratchtv.com - both are technically videoblogs, but they are very different forms/genres of media in my opinion. Please... the Rocketboom Vs. Personal Media

Re: [videoblogging] Yo Ho!

2005-12-11 Thread Christopher Weagel
Human Dog Archives: Lab 2004 http://www.human-dog.com/lab/?page_id=165 Lab 2005 http://www.human-dog.com/lab/?page_id=166 Lab Memos http://www.human-dog.com/lab/?page_id=214 Summer of V http://www.human-dog.com/V/?page_id=14 Sara's Corner http://www.human-dog.com/vidcat03.html Promos

[videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread Enric
2006 will be a year when new technologies of videoblogging appear. 2006 will also be like other years in which highly anticipated predictions will not happen and unexpected ones will. -- Enric http://www.cirne.com Determine the Media Yahoo! Groups

[videoblogging] Re: High def resolutions on the ipod

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Watkins
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy all, I thought some of you might find this interesting. It turns out the video ipod will support videos up to 720 pixels wide in mp4, not just the 420x420 that apple reported. What's more when you

[videoblogging] Re: High def resolutions on the ipod

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Watkins
Oops sorry I think I just sent an empty message. Yeah the limit is 230,400 pixels for mpeg4 on ipod, rather than 480x480, so resolutions like the following will work: 720 x 304 - 2.35:1 624 x 336 - 1.85:1 624 x 352 - 16:9 512 x 384 - 4:3 Ive tried 624x352 and 512x384 ones to the TV and they

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Josh Wolf
Actually no... the videos were created for the Christmas party, but were part of something that the producing officer had created at the website http://www.insidethesfpd.com -- I don't know yet whether or not he had an RSS feed or not -- the media content was taken down before more than a

[videoblogging] Imovie question

2005-12-11 Thread mmcallen
I have been working on my new videoblog. I am using imovie and I wondered if I might as a question to someone who uses it. If I do an intro for my show can I save it then import it into each additional show. I would rather no recreate it each time. Make sense? Sorry if it is lame to ask.

RE: [videoblogging] Digest Number 1444

2005-12-11 Thread Carl Weaver
Josh, I think you are right, but this is a great example of Verdi's point that a lot of people don't get it. It's like trying to convince my students that they should learn because it expands their knowledge base and gives them richer lives. If they don't get it, I can't convince them of this. The

[videoblogging] Re: Imovie question

2005-12-11 Thread Erin Nealey
Yes, I do this a lot! Not a lame question :) I just save my intro as a full quality file (or you can compress it), and whenever you start on a new movie, go to the file menu, and import it in! It's that easy :) Erin Nealey Mom's Brag Vlog nealey.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,

[videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually no... the videos were created for the Christmas party, but were part of something that the producing officer had created at the website http://www.insidethesfpd.com -- I don't know yet whether or not he

Re: [videoblogging] Digest Number 1444

2005-12-11 Thread Joan Khoo
My friends don't get it either. They think I'm just filming to embarass them. But that's not the point. I want to document what's happening now because its the normal and mundane that I want to remember. Sure it's not that interesting, a bunch of my friend messing around or just stopping to

[videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread Will Luers
It is starting to look like the first 100 years of cinema were all about figuring out a universal language. The next 100 years are about people having conversations with this language. So we are in a massive house party and there are many rooms, some more popular than others. Cool shit is

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread Mat Wall-Smith
I love this.and best of all it is completely il-defined and usless to the media...lets hope this is the century of many rooms We should propagate this explaining it - create an enigma around it with our considerable numbers.. On 12/12/05 12:04 PM, Will Luers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread Mat Wall-Smith
I meant 'without explaining it'... On 12/12/05 12:09 PM, Mat Wall-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I love this.and best of all it is completely il-defined and usless to the media...lets hope this is the century of many rooms We should propagate this explaining it - create an enigma

Re: [videoblogging] another win for Andrew and Amanda

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Garfield
That link doesn't work for NY Times Select articles. On Dec 10, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Jan McLaughlin wrote: http://nytimes.blogspace.com/genlink Use this, Deirdre, to generate bloggable NY Times links that don't block users from seeing the article. --Steve -- Home Page -

Re: [videoblogging] Re: 2006: Year of...

2005-12-11 Thread juan gonzalez
hahah Very Don Juan/Carlos Casteneda. I really do enjoy the house metaphor. anyway 2006 year of whatever cause that's what i'll be doing with this side of the cave. http://mrmultiple2.blogspot.com From: Mat Wall-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com To:

[videoblogging] mefeedia blogroll issue

2005-12-11 Thread havilahland33
I have been using the blogroll 'java script' through mefeedia. I just got a message from the sites manager that I should bring this up in this chat to see what everyone thinks about it. Recently they deleted this feature because not many people were using it, maybe just me :) . So what do you

[videoblogging] can you figure this out?

2005-12-11 Thread robert a/k/a r
Hi all Just posted a video and curious how many peeps can, within the first let's say 10 or 15 seconds, figure out who is speaking on screen. If you are a music and pop culture guru you prolly have it in the three seconds, else it might take a little longer. No cheating. Don't check my blog

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Jeffrey
Except that the Creator/Producer Uploaded them to the Net - and next they you know someone found them; also the vids were shared - so there is no right to privacy. Jeffrey The police videos were never intended to be public. They were created for a closed party. Very different

[videoblogging] Re: Digest Number 1444

2005-12-11 Thread Erin Nealey
In the article today, I was cited as being mundane However, isn't mundane the new punk? And punk is good right? Even if it isn't.. I'm getting more hits than ever before! It's been a good day :) Erin Nealey Mom's Brag Vlog nealey.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joan Khoo

[videoblogging] Re: High def resolutions on the ipod

2005-12-11 Thread Eric Rice
I noticed that the 480x272 video I output is 4:3ified on the iPod but plays widescreen on a wide, uh, screen. 480x272 is PSP size FYI. ER --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy all, I thought some of you might find this interesting. It

[videoblogging] holiday videos

2005-12-11 Thread JD Lasica
If I may inject a note of non-seriousness into the discussion: At Ourmedia we're inviting folks to submit holiday videos loosely related to Christmas, Hannukah, Kwanzaa, whatever. If we get a handful we'll package them onto a holiday greetings page. OK, I'll go first:

[videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Enric
There's the right to have a personal view and express it as an individual whether it's congruent with the corporate/governmental entity one works for or not. -- Enric http://www.cirne.com Determine the Media --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Jeffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[videoblogging] Re: holiday videos

2005-12-11 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, JD Lasica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I may inject a note of non-seriousness into the discussion: At Ourmedia we're inviting folks to submit holiday videos loosely related to Christmas, Hannukah, Kwanzaa, whatever. If we get a handful we'll package them

Re: [videoblogging] Re: High def resolutions on the ipod

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
...and the PSP doesn't play larger than 480? So basically there's a one size fits all solution for iPod and PSP... mp4 and 480 x whatever tall? I think I saw the details here somewhere... wish the PSP did higher too. I'm really hopefull that as more and more portable hardware devices come

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Joan Khoo
Yes a person has a right to express his views. However a person needs to respect the stance of his employers. E.g. A hospital takes an anti-abortion stance while some of its employees are pro-choice. It's employees are free to express their opinions as individuals. Its not a problem until they

[videoblogging] Re: High def resolutions on the ipod

2005-12-11 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Meiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...and the PSP doesn't play larger than 480? So basically there's a one size fits all solution for iPod and PSP... mp4 and 480 x whatever tall? I think I saw the details here somewhere... wish the PSP did

Re: [videoblogging] Re: High def resolutions on the ipod

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
Yes, it's actually very simple... apple has a simple bookmark function not to mention rankin on the ipod for mp3's when you resync you can easily see what you marked and... if they put permalinks in itunes you could comment... stupid apple... oh, but also they disabled rankings and

[videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Enric
I think most people are sophisticated enough to understand a overblown video parody. The suspension of twenty officers without pay, and Officer Andrew Cohen not even getting police union legal defense (see http://www.insidethesfpd.com/ ) does not seem commensurate with creating a video making fun

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Joan Khoo
The scary thing is that a person can be intelligent, but people are stupid. Ask anyone working in customer service. As much as I wished people don't get worked up about parodies, someone inevitably will step on toes. I think the world would be a lot nicer if more people take less offence. I'm

[videoblogging] Re: High def resolutions on the ipod

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Watkins
No, Sony deliberately limited the PSP, you cannot play video files from memorystick that are the actual resolution of the screen. The limit is something like the equivalent of 320x240, so probably only 76800 or so pixels allowed. Sony probably do this to give people a reason to buy UMD videos

Re: [videoblogging] holiday videos

2005-12-11 Thread Christopher Weagel
Already on the archive: Human Dog 2004 Xmas Special http://www.archive.org/download/ ProfChrisWeagelHumanDogXmasSpecial2004/HDXmas04.mov Chris Weagel www.human-dog.com On Dec 11, 2005, at 9:51 PM, JD Lasica wrote: If I may inject a note of non-seriousness into the discussion: At

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Markus Sandy
not so, many people sign those rights away when entering into employment for example, even if you have to buy your own uniform, there are often rules as to how you can appear in it (e.g., no endorsements) many employers (e.g., University of California) *require* the signing of a loyalty oath

[videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Enric
Yes, I think that states well the police administration and city governments point of view. The world would be pretty dull, uncreative and lacking in innovation if it catered to anyone who would be offended. No scientific innovation would occur in genetics, because it offends religious

[videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not so, many people sign those rights away when entering into employment for example, even if you have to buy your own uniform, there are often rules as to how you can appear in it (e.g., no endorsements) many

[videoblogging] Daily Dancer

2005-12-11 Thread Jay dedman
has anyone else seen this feed? http://dailydancer.com/ http://feeds.feedburner.com/DailyDancer a guy dances to a fun song each day. you can even make a song request. This is a perfect example of bad home video that journalists claim videoblogging is. it looks nothing like what they do on TV.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: High def resolutions on the ipod

2005-12-11 Thread Michael Meiser
On Dec 11, 2005, at 5:41 PM, Steve Watkins wrote: Oops sorry I think I just sent an empty message. Yeah the limit is 230,400 pixels for mpeg4 on ipod, rather than 480x480, so resolutions like the following will work: 720 x 304 - 2.35:1 624 x 336 - 1.85:1 624 x 352 - 16:9 512 x 384 - 4:3

Re: [videoblogging] holiday videos

2005-12-11 Thread David Meade
I just posted one via blip, which should be cross posted to the archive ... does that count? http://www.davidmeade.com/post/post.php?topicID=596 I could go upload it to ourmedia manually if its not there for some reason. - Dave On 12/11/05, JD Lasica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I may inject a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: An Invitation from This I Believe

2005-12-11 Thread Deirdre Straughan
I just checked on something: although the currently site looks as if theyr'e only interested in Americans, they DO want international submissions, and will be changing the site soon to reflect that. -- best regards,Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work)

[videoblogging] Re: Offensive Police Video

2005-12-11 Thread luxomaticart
Here are some of the issues I think are overlooked in the police video scandal: The district the videos were made in is the Bayview, a mostly black community, with one of the highest homicide rates in the city, and the highest in 10 years. The videos were made during company time with public

[videoblogging] new poster, long time lurker, blah blah blah

2005-12-11 Thread Joey Profit
So I'm new here. And have been reading everything as it slowly developed for several months now. Usually I'd fly in and just start posting without any formal introduction. So here it is. Cheers to beers and future posts. Sometime soon, hopefully, I'll be able to contribute something more than just