On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 22:52:17 +0100, LeanBackVids.com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My favorite thing to tell people...
> "Video editing is the new web developemnt."
I see it the other way around. Web developement is the new video editing
(as in if you can't edit video that reads well in a web
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 16:25:09 +0100, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> or traditional companies will start making feeds with bascially
> advertisements.
> youll have literally hundreds of feeds because every business must have
> a voice.
Not all company (video)blogs are evil.
> How wi
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:20:18 +0100, Steve Garfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The interesting thing is that the Yahoo! results page allows you to
> play my video directly AND it uses frames to display the original
> source page.
Very similar to Google's image search. I really like this approa
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:30:55 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I wonder about is whether watching a lot of video like this would
> slowly enable you to learn the other language? That would be worth
> studying. A lot of Spanish-speaking immigrants used to learn Englis
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 17:10:10 +0100, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Not all company (video)blogs are evil.
>
> im not making a judgement on the products...i just dont want my time
> hijacked by watching commercials.
Thinking that companies will push out feeds of the 30 second commercia
On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:07:30 +0100, Randolfe Wicker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do they find that content? A lot of well known vloggers weren't
> represented at all. There was a vlogger named "dooser" who seemed to
> have one to three vlogs on nearly every page.
>
> I noticed a lot of
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:32:51 +0100, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> this is interesting.
> its a list of known blogs circa 2000:
> http://www.jjg.net/retired/portal/tpoowl.html
I'm not on it! I got my first Blogger blog in October 2000, and if I had
one a ton of other people had them.
st format...
>
> -m
>
> On 12/4/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:32:51 +0100, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > this is interesting.
>> > its a list of known blogs circa 2000:
If you've got 15 minutes you don't have a blog entry. You have a tv
program in a blog.
- Andreas
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:20:24 +0100, Michael Ridley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure but how do I link to the segmet 15 minutes in?
>
> -m
>
> On 12/4/05, And
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:59:56 +0100, andrew michael baron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2005, at 9:40 AM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
>
>> If you've got 15 minutes you don't have a blog entry. You have a tv
>> program in a blog.
>
&
that you made about a "15"
> min mark, a claim that is %100 "unreasonable", even with sentiment.
> It's academically dishonest to impose an actual limit like this.
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2005, at 11:04 AM, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 1
I did a quick test. I couldn't figure out how to make an image into a link
to a webpage, but everything worked fine with a "button".
I create a one frame movie in ezmedia with a button that works as a link.
I export that to an interactive quicktime movie from ezmedia. From there
on I:
- O
you were not speaking generally (which is what I was calling you out
> on). Now you say:
>
> "It's academically dishonest to equate the general example with an
> absolute rule."
>
> If this were a puzzle, it would have been more fun.
>
>
>
>
>
> On
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:00:45 +0100, Frank Carver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Not that you are the only one to fall foul of this misunderstanding -
> the much-lauded Yahoo mediaRSS specification embodies the same naive
> assumptions.
There was a discussion on the media rss mailing list a while
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:01:31 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I have what is agreed to be a videoblog, and for whatever reason my
> latest post contains a long video... 20 minutes.
> Your going to tell me that I no longer have a videoblog and this was not
> a
> videoblog
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:27:42 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> alright, i see your point...
> enter vodcasts.
> ;-)
Exactly. :o)
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Yahoo! Groups Sponso
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:27:34 +0100, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hmm that didnt work for me. It leaves the rollover effects but
> removes the action. :-((
Weird.. Do you use QT7 or 6? I'm using QT6.
> I have a button and an image link ... nither work.
How do you make the image i
The plot thickens... I now have a working image link as well. I'm on
Windows as well (but QT 6.5). I have added some comments below.
> To make an image a link, just add an image and a "goto" object. set
> up the goto object and then click the link button, and drag the arrow
> from the image to
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:35:20 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless you're in Art class.
>
> ;)
Damn hippies. :o)
Anyway, in that (small) community it would be a western. You're right
about that. :o)
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:44:00 +0100, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> but the fact that people can make content for TV/portables is not
> necessarily a bad thing.
No, no. But it's different.
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:05:33 +0100, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> drat ... ok here's exactly what I'm doing:
This is all really weird. I don't want to try upgrading to QT7 just to see
if that breaks it for me as well (after all it is working for *me* :o)).
Maybe someone else can
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:02:09 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An audio recording posted online, much like a short radio show.
... or a really fucking long one. :o)
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:29:13 +0100, mancheesemo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What does this say about news shows like Rocketboom or Mobuzz? Sure
> the hosts are attractive at first, but each episode feels like the
> same thing and their attractiveness wears off.
Disclaimer: I'm not a subscribe
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:21:27 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Me too, including the flashlight. Although I'm not in the U.S.
Ditto. It's a very good use for a mobile phone. :o)
> But as you probably all know, SMS is big outside the U.S. I send
> maybe 3-4 SMS each da
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:58:52 +0100, Bill Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the problems of linking in an aggregated media world is the
> fact that if you get most of your vlogs via aggregator then how
> likely are you to see links on any given blog?
Since adding links to the videos the
when the words "irrevocable" and "perpetual" ar eused together a warning
light should go off. You are giving these guys rights to do whatever they
want with your content forever (like sellin DVDs). And the kicker is that
you can never withdraw from the deal!
In the words of my gamer friends:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:30:08 +0100, robert a/k/a r
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried out Vimeo and Blip without reading their TOS first, was
> curious about this one too. If you're saying stay clear of them then...
I'm saying *I* wouldn't deal with them. You should decide for yourself if
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:26:26 +0100, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Looks like our boy raymond caught some interesting video at some
> confenrce.
> mena trott from typepad and some audience member discussing how to
> behanve online.reminds me of some of the discussions we have on this
He is right that rights is a can of worms, but I'd like to call bullshit
on his other two points.
> The second major problem with video over IP is that of video quality,
> resolution, and bandwidth usage. These issues will work themselves out
> naturally in only a few more years, but I've always
On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:19:03 +0100, Richard Show <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Gena ... thanks for the interesting post, I do a lot of work in usability
> and human-computer interaction research and am quite familiar with Jakob
> Nielson, so thanks for the opportuntity to allow me to pontificate
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:04:25 +0100, Beth Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> plus his conversation with Dave Winer on civility
> http://benmetcalfe.com/blog/index.php/2005/12/07/dave-winer-wades-in/
Dave Winer: Fighting for civilty using rudeness since 1995.
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.d
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:43:42 +0100, Adam Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Television is salvation. Give me one good reason why I shouldn't be
> watching it RIGHT NOW instead of working, or pseudo-working/reading
> emails?
Hey, I *am* watching it right now instead of working. All hail Dr. P
o plays with
links in video are completely a-ok in my book. :o)
> Thanks to the Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen's Linkubator (
> http://www.solitude.dk/archives/linkubator/) for initial motivation !
Thanks. :o)
> Nota : it also works in FireANT MAC, but it doesn't work in DTV.
So
On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:10:57 +0100, bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it's SMIL based, I've automated the whole process within the Podesk
> software
> I'm developping.
> (dynamic layout and buttons customization).
I was sort of hoping for native QT files since you had Java runtime listed
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:58:56 +0100, Michael Meiser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really, WMV's on phones? Have you seen any open mechanisms for
> getting videos on phones coming out of japan? I'm thinking at the
> very least you can sends someone an SMS with a link to a simple
> little phone com
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, who is going to coin a new "Year of" for 2006?
>
> Will it be the Year of the Mainstream Videoblog ?
> Year of the Video Podcast ? (redundent, hey?)
> Year of the Portable Vlog ?
> Year of the Video Filters ?
>
ote:
>> Or Corporate handover ?
>> ;-)
>>
>> On 12/9/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:40:39 +0100, Michael Sullivan
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > So, who is going
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:41:08 +0100, bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will have a look at native QT files with links, but I don't think such
> movies will be playable by other players than quicktime...
They won't be. But SMIL won't either. Quicktime SMIL is not really SMIL
(you have to br
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:15:25 +0100, bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The nice thing with SMIL is that it's really easy to make it server
> side,
> but I don't know the server side tools for Quicktime.
That's why I use SMIL too. :o)
There's a Java API for Quicktime. That's why I wondered
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:40:05 +0100, Hal Goodtree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OHMO, .mov is a better codec for vlogging than .m4v. The files are
> smaller, cleaner and more
> universally compatible than .m4v. Just got to set the parameters for the
> right size. Works fine
> with iTunes.
Apple
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:40:27 +0100, Richard Show <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have a lot of trouble tolerating assholes and,
> especially, when it's online in an environment when they are not talking
> to
> someone face to face - it's too easy
Once again it's time to bring out The Greater I
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:28:52 +0100, Deirdre Straughan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaaaddd it's the big sellout!
Woohoo! It's the Adam Curry deal of videoblogging and it sounds like a
very good deal to strike. But why'd we read about it in NYT and not on
Rocketboom?
Is this where I
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:27:46 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ain't no blog, yo.
>
> sure it is well i mean rocketboom.com is a vlog...
> so, the content is derived from a vlog...
> where it ends up doesnt change that fact.
Yes, it does. The video isn't the blog entry.
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 22:52:01 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so then, what you mean to wsay is, each video... when watched on the
> tivo,
> is not a videoblog post. fine, we can all live with that for awhile...
> until tivo get bloggy with it. akimbo might already?
WebT
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 05:51:02 +0100, teaspace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know what SNL has to do with this, but my point is that police
> expect to be taken seriously when they deal with you. They also happen
> to wield a lot more power than regular folks and should probably govern
> the
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:26:45 +0100, Deirdre Straughan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/10/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I grew up on jokes of the "a Dane, a Norwegian and a Swede sits on a
>> mountain top..." variety.
>
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:54:14 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gabe of Xolo TV put up a vlog of the Les Blogs conference:
>
> http://www.xolo.tv/2005/12/les-blogs-and-corporate-blogging.html
> or
> http://tinyurl.com/8n6zu
Via Raymond: More video at http://maartenschenk.be/video/lesblogs/
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:53:59 +0100, teaspace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If any vlogger or budding amateur filmmaker produces and posts on their
> website humourous/offensive/questionable videos of their workplace and
> colleagues, in uniform and featuring prominently the corporate logo or
> publ
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:21:04 +0100, teaspace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Privacy is dead."
Regurgitated one-liners are useless.
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Fa
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:34:19 +0100, Ronen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new video formatting in rocketboom is fantastic, and is precisely
> where
> video needs to go. Very exciting stuff.
Since Yahoo is being slow and haven't processed my first reply I can still
amend it. :o)
This is gre
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:10:52 +0100, Kent Nichols
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Media RSS has not been widely adopted outside of Yahoo. Look at some
>> of the prior posts on here about multiple enclosures.
>
> That's l
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:16:20 +0100, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm using eZedia on my vids now and really like it. however the geek
> in me wants to learn how to do it the hard way :-P ...
I haven't been using eZedia much yet, but I'm really looking forward to
using it more. At
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:22:00 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Kinberg could probably address the usage of media RSS bettter.
At one point my feed wasn't working in FireANT because I'm only using
Media RSS and not regular enclosures (it's an ideological thing, not
practical and
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:24:57 +0100, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So my question is this ... If I wanted to use this SMIL stuff on my
> vlog, arent aggregators going to download just the xml file and not
> really the movie file itself? (the linkubator tool references a
> remote hoste
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:34:19 +0100, Ronen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new video formatting in rocketboom is fantastic, and is precisely
> where
> video needs to go. Very exciting stuff.
I'm glad Andrew listened even though he was very offended when I said
rocketboom video could get more
Definitions are set by a community. I don't agree with you that rocketboom
isn't personal, but we probably have different ideas of what 'personal'
means in 'videoblogs are personal'. It's about personality, not about
sharing intimate moments and to some degree about being rooted in the
life
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:44:52 +0100, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> uhm, uhm, I may be too much positive :)) Any drawbacks ?
>
> Well, I dunno. But
>
> a) not everyone uses iTunes
Thankfully SMIL works fine in the regular Quicktime Player (and browser
plugin). :o)
My browser caches
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:38:33 +0100, André Sala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm with you on this one Jay -- GREAT vlog. I really love when Ms
> Dade makes a guest appearance because he got sick. How cool would it
> be if he started to invite others to submit dance videos, ala
> "crying, while
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:06:55 +0100, David Meade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yeah I think that's what I'm going to do. eZedia is pretty cool and
> takes me all of 5 seconds to edit the link URL, export frame, and
> paste to end of vlog before I upload a new vid.
One other advantage of native QT
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:30:42 +0100, Frank Carver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So it seems to me that what's needed is a smart aggregator (um, like
> that six-legged one that crawls around here from time to time) which
> can recognize SMIL, prefetch the resources it refers to, and rewrite
> the S
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:52:18 +0100, ryanne hodson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> u
> i don't understand how that happened
> my videos only get downloaded by about 400 people a day according to
> blip stats
> but i guess that means people are on text browsers and not watching the
> vids?
>
And for the links: http://www.apple.com/quicktime/tutorials/hreftracks.html >
More tutorials for QT Pro at: http://www.apple.com/quicktime/pro/tutorials.html >
(text tracks can contain visible links)
For image links use SMIL (SMIL can also be used for chapters):
http://developer.apple.com/documen
This is not the place to complain. Contact the author directly. Free
speach (sic) concerns itself with government censorship. Any blog author
has a right to refuse any comment for any reason - and they should have.
Your speech has not been limited. If you feel this bad about it, post your
c
Hey,
I'm busy procrastinating my current school project. My focus is of course
videoblogging and I wanted to call upon the group to help me with a layout
idea.
I want to have a quote from a videoblogger at the top of each chapter. So
I'm asking anyone who wants to help a poor student out to send
> I hope to hear from some of you.
And I forgot my deadline of course. I'll be layouting Sunday evening, so
I'd like to hear from you by Sunday evening US Eastern Time.
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:27:56 +0100, petertheman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Reporters are busy (ie. lazy) ;) Whatever vlogs you mention to them
> they will probably check out, so make sure you can mention a few
> unknown ones :)
C'mone on, give them a little credit. :o)
Their boss probably onl
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:47:07 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> speaking of the vloggy vastness... what up with the book of vlog? is
> that
> still being compiled?
As far as I know it got picked up by a new publisher and is currently
being (re)written.
- Andreas
--
http
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:50:43 +0100, Steve Garfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kristina Rapacki in Norway
> http://nordark.blogs.com/nordark/
Small correction: Kristina is vlogging from Copenhagen, Denmark. I'm 99%
certain she's Swedish though (having moved to Denmark because it's so damn
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:56:51 +0100, Michael Sullivan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone have the First Twins email addresses? ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Andreas
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Yahoo! Groups Spons
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:26:41 +0100, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just checked the Japanese version of Freevlog on a PC. In both
> Firefox and IE everything is "" I used utf-8 encoding. It works
> fine on my Mac. I think maybe I don't have the right fonts installed
> on the PC. Can anyo
- Andreas
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:00:27 +0100, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Andreas,
> So is utf-8 encoding correct though?
> The code deal looks like this:
>
>
> I have no idea what the hell i'm doing with this.
> Verdi
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2005,
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:00:09 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For now we are human beings that produce and consume media through
> tools. Have to wait for nanotechnology and genetical capabilities to
> be media.
Since I managed to bring up McLuhan in the video conference today: We
don
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:21:47 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Amazon offers eight or nine different prints of this film on video.
>> They are of varying prices, and varying run times: I found run times
>> of 124min., 125min., 158min., 159min., 190min., and 207min.
>
>
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:57:28 +0100, Matthew Clayfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to be writing my postgraduate theses on videoblogging, just
> for the record.
I'm putting finishing touches (okay, last minute frantic writing) on a
paper about videoblogging right now (in Danish, but
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:38:41 +0100, Richard Bennett-Forrest
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While NTSC has a higher frame rate, PAL has a higher scan line count
> and more accurate colour reproduction, so it is just plain wrong to
> say that "you get slightly better video reproducion on NTSC".
I t
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:41:07 +0100, Matthew Clayfield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Maybe we should create a place to geek out?
>
> Most definit
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:45:45 +0100, Digital <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Tomorrow, on Dec. 21st, the Northern Hemisphere enters into the first
> day of Winter. On the 22nd, the Southern Hemisphere enters into Summer
> days. Let's see some videos! Make them however you want, just tie them
> into
IANAL and all that.
You can't copyright ideas, only works. So making a video and describing
the same settings as Freevlog is totally legal. Using the same words to
describe them is not (using the same screencasts is even worse).
- Andreas
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:58:25 +0100, Michael Verdi
<
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:42:08 +0100, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> i wonder if these Embedded Flash players will last?
> i obviously keep seeing aggregated video as being the way to go.
> all the video i watch ive downloaded through subscriptionnot gone
> to web pages to watch Flash
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:57:49 +0100, Jay dedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> i just found this link on evilvlog.com.
> http://vblogsecrets.com/
> Thank you evilvlog
I didn't see it because evilvlog spews out so much I don't have enough
hours in the day to keep up.
1) There's going to be s
f flash playback is not going away... but
> video blogging is at least putting a serious dampner on DRM'd and
> locked down files like this and encouraging more openess and
> portability... which means more flexibility, increased accessibility,
> and enhanced useability.
>
> -Mik
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:33:26 +, Arnþór Snær wrote
> Why have the browsers failed here? None of them responds in the same
> way when a user clicks an rss feed.
Browsers didn't fail. RSS failed. This issue is one of the many that the
Atom syndication format fixed. RSS never made any thought on
My point is simply that it depends and you have to judge things on a
case-by-case basis.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.
ring the program - and since they were the only movie review tv-show in
the country at the time they got what they wanted. I guess it pays to play
hardball sometimes. :o)
[1] I have this from a talk by the host of "Bogart" that I went to a
couple of years ago.
--
Andreas Haugstrup
m just going to
pretend the whole thing didn't happen. :o)
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
; Podcamp west was last weekend and was bummed I missed it. Any info
> would be great, thanks.
http://vlogcalender.com/ >
The iCal URL you can subscribe to is at:
http://www.google.com/calendar/ical/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/public/basic.ics
>
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
ot;Disctinctions in Documentary Television" (in "The Aesthetics of
Television", Aalborg University Press, 2001)
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
mm or blip or youtube? the video
> is on our blog right now ( interplast.blogs.com
> <http://interplast.blogs.com>) and i am also having trouble drowning out
> background noise. any advice would be appreciated.
>
> seth
>
> ps - are there any videobloggers in ecuador that you know of?
>
>
>
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
nd add the chapter track to that.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
ked!
I'm glad you liked VlogEurope too. I liked meeting you again. :o)
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
yurl.com/e6cap
>> SF community > http://RyanIsHungry.com
>> Community Capitalism> http://HaveMoneyWillVlog.com
>> Educate > http://node101.org
>> Collaboration > http://spinxpress.com
>> Call now to activate> 917 371 6790
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
ad first. The issue has come up on the
microformats-discuss list more than once and there are people over there
thinking thoughts (look for media metadata discussions). Discussion should
take place there or on the video-vertigo group. It's much to technical for
this list.
- Andreas
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> to upload and trade TV programs for playback around the country.
>>
>> They want to attach a lot of metadata into their postsso they are
>> asking if Media RSS could help them. Questions I have ishow do
>> they create feeds that attach all this info into the
t. :o)
> I think we already know how it would work, what it would look like, etc.
Nah. People have very different goals and very different workflows. Making
such a CMS is not an easy task.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
ng the wrong approach to this sales business.
>> >
>> > And before you ask, no it's not me, and no I don't know them.
> Kinda
>> > wish I did though. Wow...
>> >
>> > http://www.sedo.com/auction/auction_detail.php?
>> > language=us&auction_id=2322&tracked=&partnerid=
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>
>
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
VOYEURVLOGS.COM - I can't believe you haven't gotten rid of this yet.
>> > I have enough footage to fill this site up but full. Seriously.
>> > MONEY. Here. In this site. I can make a network of
>> > Vloggers that will produce the content for this without
>
.
* Check that the animations imported correctly.
* Export as Quicktime movie.
* Done.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
ther codecs I lose a fair amount of quality. I'm stuck
> and
> trying to figure out what to do.
>
> On 12/8/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Den 08.12.2006 kl. 17:19 skrev CarLBanks
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >:
Den 11.12.2006 kl. 22:13 skrev CarLBanks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How much did nominating/winning a Vloggie cost? NOTHING! :)
Nominating cost me a lot of time. Winning cost PodTech some cash. Remember
'free' just means someone else is paying.
--
Andreas Haug
ny here: http://crueltobekind.org/
>> >
>> > Further Outrage Here: http://technorati.com/search/leweb3
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> best regards,
>> Deirdré Straughan
>>
>> www.beginningwithi.com (personal)
>> www.tvblob.com (work)
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
http://www.solitude.dk/ >
601 - 700 of 868 matches
Mail list logo
