Yeah I love the eZedia program, I use it for all my videos.
The end of my videos has a single frame with my logo, url, cc license
info, and a comment button. Each is clickable and takes you to
the appropriate place.
The demo can do up to 5 items on a frame. I think my frame has 6
itmes :-P
I have all sorts of incoming ports open to my network. My ISP at least is pretty good about that. The downside of course is that in addition to the NATing and Firewalling done on my router, I've got to keep good software firewalls on all the PCs at all times ... a small price to pay I guess.
On
haha yeah I was gonna say ... pictures?! ... you mean ones that DONT move?! ... thats so 1999. :-POn 5/15/06, Markus Sandy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:better make it a video for this group ;)
Ben wrote:I have 7 puppies they are German Shepherd and Yellow Lab and they aredriving me nuts anybody
There's an interesting blog on SaveTheInternet.com about how the telco companies are trying to spin their want for the abolishment of free speech on the internet as a good thing.
http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2006/05/13/the-big-lie-of-the-week/It doesn't matter how many times the CEO of
http://www.pvponline.com/archive.php3?archive=20060515On 5/15/06, David Meade
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:There's an interesting blog on
SaveTheInternet.com about how the telco companies are trying to spin their want for the abolishment of free speech on the internet as a good thing.
http
http://digg.com/technology/PSP_to_support_Video_Blogs-- http://www.DavidMeade.comfeed:
http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo!
And being Arrogant and cocky to people from anywhere other
than the US, even though it is meant in a joke is seen as in very bad
taste. ... I personally, don't see
Americans as being that arrogant, I kinda understand the sense of
humor.
Is it somehow in good taste to be arrogant and cocky to
I was thinking about this lately too. Trackback is of course meant to help with this very issue ... but I admit I dont use trackbacks nearly as much as I should ... and I think alot of people dont.Tags are another part of it, as they often provide new entry points into the conversation, and can
anyway ... I thought it was a great audition. Probably just what the job was looking for. Didnt seem to fast start though so I almost gave up. :-P-- http://www.DavidMeade.com
feed:http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed
SPONSORED LINKS
Charles the Bill of Rights isn't about government self regulation
really. It has wording such as congress shall pass no law that
... but its REALLY about setting the legal edicts that guide the
country.
I'm not allowed to take action that would hinder your right to free speech anymore than
On 5/18/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,I guess what I'm trying to say is that there must be a better way to stop a Tiered Internet (than having governments regulate it).well again, its not that they are regulating it with net neutrality, they are only saying you
the one defeated in committe is supposed to be offered as an amendment to the COPE act this week (I think) ... that would force a vote on the issie in the full house.There's also the Internet Nondiscrimination Act of 2006 being introduced in the Senate. (
There's actually a few things that could cause this ... but assuming it is in fact unauthorized use of your mail server there are a few things you should do:First off, make sure your mail server is not an open relay. An open relay is where a mail server will forward on email even when nither
On 5/18/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to me this issimilar to reps and dems. I realize you said similar to but it seems worth pointing out that heavy hitting political groups on both sides of the fence are supporting net nuetrality.
Gun Owners of AmericaChristian Coalition of
On 5/18/06, Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was guessing the spammers are just using mydomainname.com to slap on their email, not that they were actuallyusing my server. Is that possible?Yes that's possible. Its easy to spoof the from address. (However for this to work they need to have
On 5/18/06, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good question, are there any vlogging twins?Paul
Me and my brother! (DavidMeade.com and DougMeade.com) ... although doug
never posts here, so I have to post twice as much to make up for him.--
I like the idea ... but it does concern me somewhat that people could
simply claim membership in a group and we'd all just have to live with
the fact that they are lying and being listed in that group in the
directories out there. I mean if the system lets me list myself with TWiT.TV: Leo
On 5/19/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Meade wrote:
Charles the Bill of Rights isn't about government self regulation
really. It has wording such as congress shall pass no law that
... but its REALLY about setting the legal edicts that guide the
country.
According
I don't think we disagree. I think we're just looking at the same thing from two different sides of the same coin. :-Pclearly it was written to prevent government from squashing rights ... and so yes it details some things government cant do
My point was only that it was written for the
On 5/19/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nevertheless, it looks like Charles K. wins this round. The Bill of
Rights restricts government power; Net Neutrality restricts the power
of the People (who own and control the wires).Says you. :-PGoing back and forth on definitions is
On 5/19/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Meade wrote:
This seems weasely. Why not admit that it is regulation for the Good
Cause of Protecting the Internet from Evil?I guess because the reason Net Neutrality is important to me is because it would prevent powers
On 5/19/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do NOT want to see a Tiered Internet. However, I must keep my morals. And given I believe that forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is morally wrong. Then I must also believe that regulating the Internet (even to prevent a
On 5/19/06, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is the ninth amendment :The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Yes thats what I meant when I said that Net Neutrality is the legal affirmation of
On 5/19/06, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(If you don't believe this, then fair enough,... but then we should probably have another discussion because believing
that forcibly taking away someone else's freedom is NOT morally wrong means that you MUST also believe that
There are a few good links that have been passed along in this forum ... several are listed on the voxmedia wikik:http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Vlogosphere_FAQ#Vlogging_.26_The_Law
- DaveOn 5/22/06, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to post it, as a news item on my site or possibly
Sorry I've been traveling and not had time to keep up ...On 5/20/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's interesting here is that you and others think that you have
rights to use equipment that is not yours. ... am not completely deaf to the idea, but I think that the
hidden
have the right to sell fruit but not have the right to charge more for the watermelons than the oranges?
David Meade wrote:
Sorry I've been traveling and not had time to keep up ...
On 5/20/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's interesting here is that you and others think that you
, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The magic here is who they are charging. Telcos could charge the consumer per KB if they wanted. But the dont.
So instead we're supposed to let them prioratize what can be published? That doesnt make any sense.
Charge me for the video I consume ... ok
On 5/25/06, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you demanding that FedEx deliver all packages for the same price? Yes, perhaps they wish to charge a flat rate per ounce. But what if they wanted to charge businesses more than nonprofits? What if they wanted to take bids? What if they
On 5/25/06, Devlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One
more round I guess...but you know they will forever be trying to tack
some things onto other bills...sneak a little piece away at a time.
Yup, now it moves to the full house.-- http://www.DavidMeade.comfeed:http://www.DavidMeade.com/feed
On 5/25/06, Richard (Show) Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's more, I wanted to pledge $20, but ended up pledging $40, due to a mistake in negotiating the UI.However, I know the real reason that I pledged $40 and that's because God intended me to, and who am I to argue with God.
Haha same
well for those that do acknowledge the holiday, I've done a Memorial
Day Video. Finally put my video from Pearl Harbor to use. :-)
http://www.davidmeade.com/post/post.php?topicID=810
Anyone else?
- Dave
--
http://www.DavidMeade.com
feed:http://www.DavidMeade.com/feedOn 5/29/06, Casey
an idea just hit me out of the blue ... it may be stupid, or it may be already done, but I figured this group could let me know on either ...You know how we have rel=enclosure for links in a post that should be enclosed in a feed ...
how about a new micro-format for
This varies a great deal from vlogger to vlogger. There's no rule except do what feels right for you. Some post daily, some once a week, some every other month. :-) I myself aim for 2-4 vlogs a month ... and if I go over great! If I were doing some sort of 'show' (themed or episode based
then not used it as a link to the video. All you need isrel=enclosure - if that link points to a video resource then you can
safely assume that the first image contained in the link is the thumbnail.e.g. a href="" rel=enclosureimg src="" //a- Andreas
On Tue, 30 May 2006 23:31:2
rel=enclosure. Arent we seeing alot
of this now (pretty sure I am)
On 5/30/06, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes but I'm talking about feed here not a post.
Imagine a blog a post lists 3 or 4 different formats. If the enclosure in the feed is QuickTime, but the default link on the post
On 5/30/06, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think adding additional semantic HTML attributes would help
much either. Often the bloggers who post with strange HTML conventions
aren't the type of people who know much about HTML. I certainly
wouldn't expect them to grok a
well ipods need to be mp4 or H.264 encoded quicktime (mov, mp4, or
m4v). PSPs can play mp4s, but I dont think there is an mp4
compression setting that is both Ipod/PSP friendly ... not sure
though. Of course, all the windows handheld devices out there can
play windows media.
If you're already
I've found it useful at times. I use feeds all over the place. Often
I'll be in the list and want to check out some stuff from one of the
authors here, but dont want to vlog surf for whatever reason ... so
I'll copy the feed into mefeedia or something and check it out later.
I agree that it's
While I think its kinda silly to debate what links people choose to advertise in their signature ...Google Reader (http://www.google.com/reader/view/) is pretty cool IMHO and integrates to your google home page in google's typicaly way-cool fashion. It's only a matter of time before its
Are you sure you selected the Fast Start option when creating your
movie? This will let the video play while its downloading ...
otherwise it has to load the whole thing first.
On 6/1/06, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using Verdi's 3ivx/QT Pro compression process and getting great
Vloggercon in the midwest would be pretty cool!
Oh and:
Ahk I'm not listed on meFeedia's Chicago list?! I'm ... I'm
I'm going to offer som suggested additions check out all
the poeople listed at: http://chicagovideobloggers.com/ for a good
starter list :-)
- Dave
On 11/18/06,
On 11/24/06, Deirdre Straughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe Andreas meant that Ohio is shit to get to from Europe, not that
the state itself is shit - it is a simple objective truth that, given
connection times, it would take any of us longer to get to the biggest
airport in OH than to
hmm I downloaded it in about 16seconds according to firefox (which was
also very close to my counting the seconds aloud result).
On 11/28/06, Loiez D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange (?)
It's very good for me
( PowerBook G4/Safari/ADSL 8 Mo/France )
Loiez
Le 28 nov. 06 à 17:31, Zenophon
wooo I can't wait to try it out!
I'm not an HTML newbie, but prefer the auto-javascript rewrite idea
because it will work on old posts without going back and editing them,
and leaves 'pure' links should I move to a different system in the
future.
On 1/31/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question for Blip: Somewhere in my blip profile I told it my itunes
URL is http://www.davidmeade.com/itunes and this is the itunes URL
that is shown on my 'show' page.
Is there some reason my show page doesn't similarly use my feed URL
(http://www.davidmeade.com/feed) that I've also specified?
I've been looking for inspiration to get my lazzy butt back to
vlogging ... I can think of no better reason than to take advantage of
the opportunity to put a question to The Batman Geek I will
dream up some worthy question and upload a video this weekend.
On 2/16/07, Heath [EMAIL
Depends on the type of video file, but if you're using QuickTime, I
recommend a lil program called eZediaQTI
(http://www.ezedia.com/products/eZediaQTI/index.html) It lets you
create nice looking links and buttons. There's a free demo version
that has enough functionality for most simple uses.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Charles,
Sorry, guess I wrote too much as always. You *can* make part of it
clickable, using either the tool that David Meade suggested or by
creating clickable areas in the sprite track. However many areas,
however small or large, for as long or short as you want
I'd be willing to give it a go, if there are any invites left
On 4/4/07, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have 5.
On 4/4/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's more invites to be had now if you are still interested.
Cheers
Steve Elbows
--- In
I've used Skype on my mobile phone as well. My phone will use WiFi if
available but I have unlimited data plan too so it doesnt really
matter.
Just be sure to check the processor that your phone has. I have the
cingular 8125 (an HTC phone) and its a bit underpowered for Skype
(even compared to
well assuming your publishing process doesnt have a built in process
to create a feed for you. you can always use a separate tool to create
one.
The idea would be to use such a tool to update your rss feed xml file
and then upload that new file to your web site. When people request
your feed
Thanks Casey.
Will this sync to the ipod as well? I know there is some magic range
of settings that will sync to both.
Granted, its a trade off. AppleTV can support settings the ipod
cant, but rumor has it that even at this compromise videos still look
good on TV.
- Dave
On 4/13/07, Casey
They seem to be giving attribution and providing direct download links
to the original file ... downloads will hit blip for stats and links
will hit feedburner and what not ... but the transcoding still bugs
me. I wonder why these sites are so determined to eat up their own
hosting/bandwidth
Hmm, I seem to be able to do it ok in QT Pro on my PC.
(There is a settings button where you can set all the h.264 settings,
but you have to then click an entirely different size button to set
the size).
I'll try to create a video w/ these settings on my PC today and out it
online somewhere.
On
of course use the m4v export to ipod option but my show is
very very long (usually 1 hour 30 mins)and the straight export make
the file size WAY to huge. Thus needing to manipulate the bitrate.
Rev. Chumley
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm, I seem to be able
There was a recent discussion about that on this list:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/message/58994
- Dave
On 4/16/07, caminofilm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
Can someone tell me how to add a html link to the end of a quicktime
movie?
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
?! .. !?
On 4/18/07, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WTF?
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1882/125/
C.
---
http://galacticast.com/
Yahoo! Groups Links
--
http://www.DavidMeade.com
found it ... if we undo his undo should we mark it as Vandalism
(defined as change of content made in a deliberate attempt to
compromise the integrity of Wikipedia) ... or what?
On 4/30/07, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wow he's already undone it all ...
how does one undo his undo? (I'm
wow he's already undone it all ...
how does one undo his undo? (I'm all signed up and ready to fight the
good fight) :-)
- Dave
On 4/29/07, Jan McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has rather been decimated.
Wow.
Anybody?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlog
Jan
--
The Faux Press -
limiting all reference to a new media medium to those coming from
mainstream media is insane and shows a near complete ignorance of the
topic trying to be described ... as such I suggest you stop editing
the page.
On 4/30/07, pdelongchamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey everyone,
I seem to be
but many feeds have the cc license information embedded already ...
for me, its included in my feed specifically so that *I* don't have to
travel with my media and tag its license at every site in the world
... I've already included all that information with the syndicated
media within the feed
On 5/25/07, Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there someway of finding out without actually coming to California
again for the weekend, who is on show and if I can watch on line
somewhere?
I know that with Twittervlog in attendance there's going to be lots of
'nearly live' video :-P
yes Amen to KISS ... but what about the year? 07 vs the potential 08? :-)
pixelodeon07
??
- Dave
On 5/25/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Den 25.05.2007 kl. 20:27 skrev David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This (kinda) begs the tag question. What is everyone going
From what I recall ... it's not vegas' fault but Quicktime's. There
is something about the Windows Quicktime API that is not exposed to
windows applications (not even if you have QT Pro installed). I'm
pretty sure its the AAC audio codec.
Basically windows applications cant request the AAC
I'm a huge fan of Premiere Elements. Its about $100 I think. If
you ask me its the best one out there in that price range (for
windows).
The full blown Premiere is more expensive (and has more features).
Lots of people are fond of Sony Vegas ... I personally don't like it
but that probably
On 6/4/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This situation means that even if buying quicktime pro, the process
will be more of a pain than your current export from video editing app.
That's been my experience yeah. I edit in Premier Elements and
export the final product as an
On 6/4/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So for those still wishing to use their stuff, and create ipod
apple-tv compatible mpeg4 instead of h264, its harder to recommend
3ivx than it used to be.
Well the issue isn't the video codec its the audio. I could select
h264 if I wanted to
Check out Enric's vPIP tool.
http://vpip.org/
On 6/5/07, mark_raheja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey smarty-pants collective.
can someone share a link that demos what i describe in the email
subject line?
ideally a flash video player that pops up contextually over top of a
page you're
On 6/6/07, Roxanne Darling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles,
As I understand the robots.txt exclusion, you have to either specify
the directory to stay out of, and that would keep all crawlers out
(using the disallow instruction), or you have to specify the user
agent. I don't think most
I'm going to have to seriously try not to push/shove/tackle people in my
efforts to make an appearance on twittervlog. :-)
I'm going to be movlogging some too I think. My camera phone sucks in
comparison, but I want to give it a shot anyway.
I'll be tagging mine with pixelodeon2007 (I assume
On 6/6/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the robots.txt thing, Im not in favour of those sorts of
technological measures. The bad guys can just ignore them, and
sometimes they could backfire and punish innocent end users who may
use some nonstandard client to watch feeds in
On 6/6/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point about it potentially hampering end-users was wrong because
Robots.txt is easy to ignore. This also means I assume those bad
actors who dont care would never bother getting their stuff to look at
robots.txt in the first place. I
I had an absolute blast. It was so great to meet everyone. I look forward
to the next get together. BIG thanks to all the organizers.
No to find time to edit all that footage I have. :-)
Oh ... And yes, Heath, I'd be glad to attend any gathering here in the
mid-west!
- Dave
--
There was a company at pixelodeon that was talking about this very thing. (
http://www.mywaves.com/ ) I didnt get the low down on them or their
product/service ... but maybe someone here can give a summary.
If that's not what you're looking for you may have to get inventive. :-)
On 6/13/07,
Finding videos probably isn't a challenge for those who would be interested
in doing this. no? What I think would be of great value on the wiki is a
sort of FAQ/Tips on how to accomplish such an event:
1) What sort of venues might be interested in participating?
2) Where should I start my
I'm still amazed they released the phone on the slower of the data networks
available to cingular/att ... Next time I pay that much for a phone you can
bet it's going to be on the faster network. (I mean I can surf the web,
play mp3s, and watch videos on my current windows-based phone ... being
movie nights at the Pioneer theater
(http://twoboots.com/pioneer) every few months. The next one will coincide
with
vloggercue (http://vloggercue.pbwiki.com/), most likely on Sunday 12
August.
David Meade wrote:
Finding videos probably isn't a challenge for those who would be
interested
Hi Patrick -
The hosting company that hosts MeFeedia has had some (extremely
frustrating) issues lately. It's not you, its the hosting company. The
site should be back up shortly, and you'll be able to add your feed then.
We're in touch with the hosting company now, and there are
I haven't but I have been tempted to buy it. :-) I'd love to hear some
reviews here.
The one thing I'm concerned about is that it apparently uses pre-set
compression profiles (which makes a certain amount of sense) but I
really like being able to edit/tweak the compression settings.
Anyone
I made the switch about a week ago. So far, I'm loving it. There are
Pros, and there are Cons ... but they are all sleeker, shinier, sexier, and
well thought out.
On 6/27/07, David S Kessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's ok Mike, nothing to be ashamed of. I personally swing both ways.
in
On 6/30/07, Lan Bui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PodTech had the chance to ask to purchase a license to use the
photograph before it was used, at which time they would be able to set
the terms. That didn't happen. Now that they have used the photograph
already, who should set the terms?
This to
ok so I have a mac now and am learning Final Cut Express (FCE). Overall its
similar to how I would be using Premier Elements on the PC, however there is
one big problem with FCE and I'm hoping someone here can offer a solution.
Note: I also got the One To One training thing from the apple store,
can do this on a Mac.
Doesn't handbrake or hub do this? No, a quick look at hb shows it'll
do a lot but from DVD only.
Take a look here: http://www.pure-mac.com/video.html
Quite a list, you may find what you need.
hope this helps
On 1 Jul 2007, at 22:21, David Meade wrote:
Isn't
On 7/3/07, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have quicktime pro, you should be able to open the m4v/mp4 in
quicktime, then do a 'save as' 'self contained movie'. This should
give you a mov without actually needing to recompress the video or
audio again, it just wraps it up in a
I've been vlogging for over two years now, and I don't have a big
following. There were some people at pixelodeon who were kind enough to
pretend they'd heard of me though, and that's good enough for me - Casey
McKinnon talked to me ... vlogging mission accomplished. :-)
For the record, feed
I've been thinking about the Xacti cameras lately (or others of similar
design), and have been trying to read up on them online. Unfortunately all
the user reviews usually have the same problems:
1) EXTREME (polar opposite) opinions on video quality in the same forum
2) No actual video to back
? apperceptions.org
Or Verdi too, I think?
--
-Devlon
http://devlonduthie.com | http://mefeedia.com | http://node-64.com/blog
MSN: du.th.ied
AIM: devlond
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Meade
Sent: Saturday, July
Great stuff everyone, thanks!
The new CG65 sounds interesting.
I'm not sure I need the HD ... I'll be compressing down for the web anyway
... HD may be overkill? Plus the smaller size of the CG65 is tempting.
I can't tell from the Sanyo site if it has the external mic jack though ...
that
The good news is, I don't think this is a problem with Premiere The
bad news is, I think its a problem with your codecs.
That canon camera (the same one I use) stores its AVIs in MJPEG format. It
sounds like one of your installs/updates changed (or perhaps even removed)
the MJPEG video
On 7/8/07, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would certainly buy another Xacti without reservation. I've been
happy with it.
Thats good to know. (also good to hear that the plants aren't talking over
you.)
One thing I think Sanyo needs to do is explain the difference between their
I've had mine on a separate wordpress page for a while now. My page is
basically full of del.icio.us widgets listing various categories one of
which is 'vloggers'. So I can tag something in delicious and it
automatically gets added to my links page.
- Dave
On 7/10/07, Bill Streeter [EMAIL
that for my vlogroll and using
delicious just for other categories of links.
- Dave
On 7/10/07, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had mine on a separate wordpress page for a while now. My page is
basically full of del.icio.us widgets listing various categories one of
which
of the codec written over every AVI. Do you
know of another mjpeg codec that wouldn't do that?
Thank you again for a positively thorough response! Much appreciated.
joanna
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The good news is, I don't
with
before I download any other stuff.
No problem, glad you got it working again.
- Dave
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ah. sounds like maybe that codec is watermarked unless you pay for it or
something.
I just stumbled across another site
On 7/12/07, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the rest of us, who are concerned about what Podtech did and the
way they've behaved since.
Right. PodTech is a company that wants to work with independent / new-media
producers ... its reasonable for a community of such producers to be
There really wasn't any other way for them to do it. YouTube's systems can
be gamed to easily to allow youtubers to select the questions the
candidates committees would have had no problem gaming the system in order
to get the questions they wanted rated into the debate.
Overall I think
On 7/24/07, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I S wanted to go to the vloggies last
yearso I bought the buddy passes for my wife and I and set
an open date for LA to go to the vloggies this year.
Now I wonder if I didn't just waste a bunch of money
Not to worry, Heath, at
On 7/24/07, John Furrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not true Kent. I responded immediately to Lan and what was said shall
remain private. It is over and we fully respect CC and producers work.
I think what you keep failing to understand, John, is that your issue WITH
LAN is over your
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Meade
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:05 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: irina gone
On 7/24/07, John Furrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:john%40podtech.net
wrote:
Not true Kent. I responded
301 - 400 of 504 matches
Mail list logo
