The universe of audio and video will always have all sorts of lengths, sizes and qualities among its parts. There is no right or wrong on this subject. I do agree shorter is better for a lot of things - especially in this early stage of internet distribution.I so thrilled to have found the
I'm using flash to make 20 minute+ files.I createFLV format and it handles20+minute videos perfectly.
I have heard that theSWF format requires a user trick--match your SWF fps to the original file fps in orderto to create an SWF that stays in sync the netire clip.
Nerissa
ps-- not all
H.264 will probably have ubiquity soon, but I don't believe it is
quite universal yet. Saving as Quicktime is not very specific, I
think. The big question is what audio and video codec do you want to
use. For this, I would see (pun intended) the Pocket PC and Palm
users as the limiting
ecomputerd wrote:
And we'll soon see (if you haven't already!) RSS
Video direct to TV.
Where oh where are the MythTV hackers... We need one on this list!
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
SPONSORED LINKS
I know that Sorenson Squeeze allows you to break your movie into
seperate flv files where they load sequentally. Not sure if any
other 3rd party tools do this.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Nerissa \(TheVideoQueen\)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using flash to make 20 minute+
So, josh, I would encourage you to think out of the Web ;-)
I can't watch anything longer than 5 minutes anywhere (5 minutes is
really pushing the limits of my attention span), not just on the web.
I won't watch a 28 minute segment on TV, or listen to 28 minutes
straight on the radio
I like small chunks, but I really love long stuff too.
Some stuff just cant be handled in little chunks, I like epics. The
temptation to talk of legendary lower attention span in certain
nations is almost too much to resist, but I will try.
Or do a combination. There is the video of
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
why not provide both Windows Media and Quicktime.
I would never want to watch a 28min. video on the web -- I think
many
would agree.
What if it's really compelling stuff you can't get anywhere else?
Some
Why not make each of these a separate chunk.
Then I might be able to watch and even link to individual parts of it
rather than tell someone:
you know there's some good stuff from minute 18:30 to 21:10
(Or i could use MeFeedia's new quoting tool: plugging for Peter)
-josh
On 8/8/05,
I really don't want to seperate it. Do you really think that is
necessary? It flows from one thing to the other.
What's this quoting thing you're talking about?
Jamie
thekeverreport.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why not make each of
I don't think its necessary... your target output is TV not the web,
and to re-edit everything would be a big PITA.
But, if your target output was the web then I would definitely say
smaller chunks are better. Maybe even separate blog entries for each
bit so there are permalinks to specific
I like your advice. I'll adjust fire.
Jamie
thekeverreport.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't think its necessary... your target output is TV not the web,
and to re-edit everything would be a big PITA.
But, if your target output
IA = Internet Archive
On 8/8/05, jmedakev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is IA? Can I embed mp4 and get the quicktime embedded
controller?
Jamie
thekverreport.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
Hi everyone:
At 10:34 PM 8/8/2005, Josh Kinberg wrote:
IA = Internet
Archive
On 8/8/05, jmedakev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is IA? Can I embed mp4 and get the quicktime embedded
controller?
Quicktime 7 does this automatically as if it were an MOV file. But
in order for it to work though,
14 matches
Mail list logo
