Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Markus Sandy
i find it had to believe we would get our money's worth Jan McLaughlin wrote: >Well, the way I understand Our Media works, it's volunteer moderators >who flag potential copyright-suspicious vids for later attorney review. >In other words, let's find out why the vid was pulled directly from >so

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Jan McLaughlin
Well, the way I understand Our Media works, it's volunteer moderators who flag potential copyright-suspicious vids for later attorney review. In other words, let's find out why the vid was pulled directly from some moderator's mouth, and furthermore, invite an attorney to address this. Don't k

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Michael Ridley
OK, since you brought it up - it must be saidthe best US Appelate Court opinion ever - Mattel, Inc vs. MCA Records, Inc. for trademark infringement on their "Barbie" mark and the counterclaim by MCA for defmation...in the US 9th Circuit...in the opinion of the court, Judge Kozinski writes... "

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Paul Knight
Oh come on Randy It's only a Barbie doll with no clothes on!! Paul k On 30 Nov 2005, at 21:12, Randolfe Wicker wrote: Is this the "Internet Archive" that claims to be capturing "the history of our day?"  Aren't sexual issues part of that history? It is really outrageous that they took your vlog o

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Randolfe Wicker
Is this the "Internet Archive" that claims to be capturing "the history of our day?"  Aren't sexual issues part of that history? It is really outrageous that they took your vlog off.  And, I say that, as someone who doesn't fully agree with your viewpoint.    Actually, I watched this vlog

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Pete Prodoehl
duncan wrote: > usually i stay out of these talks these days but this one... > > I suffer the same problems as Adrian (plus I teach video classes > regularly)... > -but in terms of working creatively I've never found it prohibitive, ... > sampling of other material is one method, but not using it

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread duncan
usually i stay out of these talks these days but this one...  Most can not be broadcast on community TV because they continually use copyrighted content (music) in their productions. That is bad teaching, not a bad law I don't know about that.  Have you ever taught a video class?  Teaching

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-29 Thread Ronen
On 11/30/05, Adrian Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: around the 30/11/05 Ronen mentioned about Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive that: >Does it make all of these services (incl. iTunes) unprofessional >that they pull anything with copyrighted content with fi

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-29 Thread Adrian Miles
around the 30/11/05 Ronen mentioned about Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive that: >Does it make all of these services (incl. iTunes) unprofessional >that they pull anything with copyrighted content with first checking >if the content has been liscensed? not sure th

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-29 Thread Ronen
Does it make all of these services (incl. iTunes) unprofessional that they pull anything with copyrighted content with first checking if the content has been liscensed?On 11/29/05, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm guessing it might have more to do with the copywritten music than  Barbie

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-29 Thread Verdi
I'm guessing it might have more to do with the copywritten music than Barbie. My daughter Dylan has had a video on the archive for a while now with Barbies in it. http://dylanverdi.com/index.php/2005/03/19/toys-of-our-lives/ -Verdi -- Me: http://michaelverdi.com R&D: http://graymattergravy.co

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-29 Thread Jan McLaughlin
Barbie is notoriously jealous of her image. Nothing to do with "provocative" at all. Jan -- "It isn't done alone. Pay more." http://groups.yahoo.com/group/roadnode101/ - education http://fauxpress.blogspot.com - motion http://blog.urbanartadventures.com - sound http://vlogpresskit.blogspot.com

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-29 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:09:29 +0100, Aimee Buyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://onegirloneworld.blogspot.com/2005/11/warning-sites-linked-contain-adult.html I don't know whether I should laugh or cry. Barbie Too Hot For Internet Archive. - Andreas -- http://www.solitude.dk/> Commentary on

Re: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive

2005-11-29 Thread T.Whid
It probably doesn't have anything to do with it being sexually provocative, it's just provoking a lawsuit... Mattel has a long history of suing like crazy over Barbie. just google barbie lawsuit... Still, it's a drag that it was removed. On 11/29/05, Aimee Buyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wel