I have installed the winmanager plugin and it seem to work in a way that I
prefer. However I have tried to find a way of specifying a default path when
starting the file browser. As it is now the browser always start in my home
directory, I would like it to start in let say
~/workspace/. Does
Hello everyone
Thank you very much for your help.
Unfortunately after playing more with the settings I was unable to
restore the same font as were before.
Is there possible to run the old executable configuration as before
the 7 installation or do I have to upgrade/downgrade to return to the
Boris Dinkevich wrote:
Hello everyone
Thank you very much for your help.
Unfortunately after playing more with the settings I was unable to
restore the same font as were before.
Is there possible to run the old executable configuration as before
the 7 installation or do I have to
On 9/3/06, Boris Dinkevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone
Thank you very much for your help.
Unfortunately after playing more with the settings I was unable to
restore the same font as were before.
Is there possible to run the old executable configuration as before
the 7
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
I just want to thank Bram specially for all the scripting related
improvements that were done in Vim7. After converting most of my plugins
to use Lists instead of multvals plugin, other than having a cleaner and
more compact code, my productivity has improved
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
According to the help, if you specify a value of 0 for default, none of
the choices should be selected, but this is not how it is working. I
tried both on win32 and cygwin (X) gvim and both default to 1 instead.
Is there another trick to not select any of the
On 9/3/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still miss pre and post increment and decrement operators (avoids a
separate :let command by itself),
You mean, as in:
:let linenr = a++
I don't know how difficult this is to implement, and if there are any
conflicts in the
Dnia sobota, 2 września 2006 12:36, Kim Schulz napisał:
Omnicompletion++:
---
Omnicompletion is a great new feature, but I would like to see it
become even stronger. The intellisense plugin for gvim on win32 has
some of the features I would love to see in the generic omni
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 9/3/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still miss pre and post increment and decrement operators (avoids a
separate :let command by itself),
You mean, as in:
:let linenr = a++
I don't know how difficult this is to implement, and if
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:23:26 +0200
Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 9/3/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still miss pre and post increment and decrement operators
(avoids a separate :let command by itself),
You mean, as in:
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:21:06 +0200
Mikolaj Machowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You point can be split in two:
1. Intellisense plugin is tied to widget system. It could mean that
popup system had to be written each time for each GUI. Monstrous
effort for writing and maintaining.
I dont
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 01:21:06PM +0200, Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
Dnia sobota, 2 wrze?nia 2006 12:36, Kim Schulz napisa?:
Omnicompletion++:
---
Omnicompletion is a great new feature, but I would like to see it
become even stronger. The intellisense plugin for gvim on
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 12:53pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
According to the help, if you specify a value of 0 for default, none of
the choices should be selected, but this is not how it is working. I
tried both on win32 and cygwin (X) gvim and both default to 1
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 12:53pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Can't you use something like:
for loop_index in range(1, 10)
body
endfor
As I said in my reply to Tony, this is inefficient when the range is
big, and to avoid this problem Python has irange() which is an
enumeration.
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 2:23pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 9/3/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still miss pre and post increment and decrement operators (avoids a
separate :let command by itself),
You mean, as in:
:let linenr = a++
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 2:23pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 9/3/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still miss pre and post increment and decrement operators (avoids a
separate :let command by itself),
You mean, as in:
:let linenr
The version 4.1 has significant changes over the 3.x version, both
internally and in terms of features. The plugin has also undergone a
major overhaul to use the new Vim7 features and this should make it a
lot more cleaner to work with. Some of you wanted to contributed before,
but I know it was
Is there an easy way to say make line N (e.g., 502) the top line of the
visual screen?
On 9/3/06, GARY FURASH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an easy way to say make line N (e.g., 502) the top line of the
visual screen?
zcr makes current line the top line of screen.
To make line 502 top line of screen, use following mapping
nmap f2 Gzcr
and type 502f2
:help zcr
Yakov
Is there an easy way to say make line N (e.g., 502) the top line of the
visual screen?
I'm not sure there is much easier than
502Gzt
You could map the Gzt portion to something if you wanted...
:nnoremap f4 Gzt
which will default to the last line in the file if you don't
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
According to the help, if you specify a value of 0 for
default, none of the choices should be selected, but this is
not how it is working. I tried both on win32 and cygwin (X)
gvim and both default to 1 instead. Is there another trick to
not
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 12:53pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Can't you use something like:
for loop_index in range(1, 10)
body
endfor
As I said in my reply to Tony, this is inefficient when the range is
big,
What performance degradation have you
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
[...]
but adding a for loop variant should
be much simpler.
[...]
I don't know what you mean with loop variant.
I think he means something like
:for i=1 to 100 [by 5]
:do something
:endfor
or
:for
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 8:21pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 12:53pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Can't you use something like:
for loop_index in range(1, 10)
body
endfor
As I said in my reply to Tony, this is inefficient when
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 8:21pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
According to the help, if you specify a value of 0 for
default, none of the choices should be selected, but this is
not how it is working. I tried both on win32 and cygwin (X)
gvim and both
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Hari Krishna Dara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
thanks for this great plugin. At work I have been forced by my employer
to work in Emacs because it has a good perforce integration plugin.
With this Vim plugin I finally was allowed to use Vim instead of
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 at 10:32pm, Kim Schulz wrote:
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Hari Krishna Dara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
thanks for this great plugin. At work I have been forced by my employer
to work in Emacs because it has a good perforce integration plugin.
With this
Hi all,
The BufWinEnter autocmd is not invoked when splitting a window.
According to the help for the BufWinEnter autocmd, this autocmd
is invoked when a buffer is displayed in a window.
For example, use the following autocmd:
au BufWinEnter * echomsg Entering buffer . expand(afile)
With
Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote:
The BufWinEnter autocmd is not invoked when splitting a window.
According to the help for the BufWinEnter autocmd, this autocmd
is invoked when a buffer is displayed in a window.
For example, use the following autocmd:
au BufWinEnter * echomsg Entering
Patch 7.0.082
Problem:Calling a function that waits for input may cause List and
Dictionary arguments to be freed by the garbage collector.
Solution: Keep a list of all arguments to internal functions.
Files: src/eval.c
*** ../vim-7.0.081/src/eval.c Sat Sep 2 13:45:01
I wrote:
Patch 7.0.082
Problem:Calling a function that waits for input may cause List and
Dictionary arguments to be freed by the garbage collector.
Solution: Keep a list of all arguments to internal functions.
Files:src/eval.c
I vaguely recall that some people
Yakov Lerner wrote:
When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it
started to work as expected.
No, it would not work as I want it to. Block would not end unclosed
String. Like this:
{ Some string with a quote ( ) inside }
With ''kepend extend', it
apparently takes identifier-closing
On 9/3/06, Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it
started to work as expected.
No, it would not work as I want it to. Block would not end unclosed
String. Like this:
{ Some string with a quote ( ) inside }
Ah, I have a guess what
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 9/3/06, Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it
started to work as expected.
No, it would not work as I want it to. Block would not end unclosed
String. Like this:
{ Some string with a quote ( ) inside }
Ah,
Sorry for duplicating, but my mailer for some reason removed several
spaces from my pictures.
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 9/3/06, Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it
started to work as expected.
No, it would not work as I want it to.
On 9/2/06, Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I have a question regarding syntax matching. I have some kind of syntax
and I have some solution to highlight it, but it does not work the way I
expect it to.
What I want: match syntax that consists of blocks (enclosed in {}),
strings (enclosed
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 9/2/06, Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I have a question regarding syntax matching. I have some kind of syntax
and I have some solution to highlight it, but it does not work the way I
expect it to.
What I want: match syntax that consists of blocks (enclosed in
On 9/3/06, Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it
started to work as expected.
No, it would not work as I want it to. Block would not end unclosed
String. Like this:
{ Some string with a quote ( ) inside }
What about the following
On 9/3/06, Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 9/2/06, Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I have a question regarding syntax matching. I have some kind of syntax
and I have some solution to highlight it, but it does not work the way I
expect it to.
What I want: match
39 matches
Mail list logo
