On 12/10/06, Benji Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
span class=bar (text) /span
in the body, while the non-CSS version will have something like
font color=#EEE bgcolor=333 (text) /font
and now the CSS version is easier to read.
Yes I see,
If i had written this from scratch i
On 01/10/06, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope your enjoying your weekend.
As promised i have ammended the patch.
Hi Guys,
I havent recieved any feedback on this patch yet, did anyone get a
chance to look at it?
Sorry to be a bore.
Best Regards
Edd
(Sorry if you recieve this twice, I don't think the first one made it
onto the list for whatever reason.)
On 26/09/06, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ill add this in as soon as I can, but university work is coming in
hard at the moment so it might not be until the weekend.
Greetings
Michael Schaap wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
I second the motion; and since the font actually used is the first one
found from the font-family item, I suggest (all on one line):
+execute normal! A\npre { font-family: 'Courier New', monospace;
color: . s:fgc . ;
The suggestion from Benji Fisher to add a variable to allow people to
use another font sounds good to me. Make sure it's properly documented,
especially about using more than one name and quotes around the name.
Great,
Ill add this in as soon as I can, but university work is coming in
hard
Edward L. Fox wrote:
But we should change one thing before we include this patch into the
official version. In the patch file, line 97:
+execute normal! A\npre { font-family: courier; color: . s:fgc
. ; background-color: . s:bgc . ; }\e
Should be:
+execute normal! A\npre {
Does that mean that you are waiting for Bram to give his blessing?
Na, just that it's not my decision to make. I'll just do the code.
Best Regards
Edd
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 16:41 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Steve Hall wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 00:31 +0200, Michael Schaap wrote:
I beg you, please don't hardcode Courier New!
[snip]
It's not just the proper way, it's the first thing discussed in the
specification:
[Resending because Thunderbird sent the original email in HTML, which
vim.org promptly bounced. Grrr.]
Steve Hall wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 16:41 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
Steve Hall wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 00:31 +0200, Michael Schaap wrote:
I beg you, please don't
Edward L. Fox wrote:
But we should change one thing before we include this patch into the
official version. In the patch file, line 97:
+execute normal! A\npre { font-family: courier; color: . s:fgc
. ; background-color: . s:bgc . ; }\e
Should be:
+execute normal! A\npre {
Hello all,
On 23/09/06, George V. Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward L. Fox wrote:
But we should change one thing before we include this patch into the
official version. In the patch file, line 97:
+execute normal! A\npre { font-family: courier; color: . s:fgc
. ;
George V. Reilly wrote:
Edward L. Fox wrote:
But we should change one thing before we include this patch into the
official version. In the patch file, line 97:
+execute normal! A\npre { font-family: courier; color: . s:fgc
. ; background-color: . s:bgc . ; }\e
Should be:
+execute
Edd Barrett wrote:
Hello all,
On 23/09/06, George V. Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward L. Fox wrote:
But we should change one thing before we include this patch into the
official version. In the patch file, line 97:
+execute normal! A\npre { font-family: courier; color: . s:fgc
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
I second the motion; and since the font actually used is the first one
found from the font-family item, I suggest (all on one line):
+execute normal! A\npre { font-family: 'Courier New', monospace;
color: . s:fgc . ; background-color: . s:bgc . ; }\e
which will
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 00:31 +0200, Michael Schaap wrote:
I beg you, please don't hardcode Courier New!
Hear, hear!
Not only is it the worst possible monospaced screen font, it is also
Microsoft specific (in spite of it finding its way onto Tony's Linux
box). (Even Microsoft has seen the
I beg you, please don't hardcode Courier New!
Hear, hear!
Not only is it the worst possible monospaced screen font, it is also
Microsoft specific (in spite of it finding its way onto Tony's Linux
box). (Even Microsoft has seen the light, and changed the default
monospaced font to Consolas
Hi developers,
On 9/22/06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edd -
I have spoken to your development team and I think we have come to a
conclusion.
I draw your attention to this thread:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/vimdev/message/44853
Lemme know your opinions.
I haven't
17 matches
Mail list logo
