but instead nothing happens.
following your instructions I get an error message here:
Illegal filename ~/
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Vim-7.3.782 (huge, gtk2) on Linux-x86_64.
the only difference here is my vim is big
sc
--
--
You received
it, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's not being sent
to me. My ISP (ATT) does spam filtering before I get to see it --
sorry, not very conclusive.
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
I
don't recommend placing it on top of your dog.
It is available in English and Dutch. You can find it on my website:
http://moolenaar.net/#Calendar
seems to work fine on cats:
http://toothpik.github.com/stubbie_cal1.JPG
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top
in a hurry hit S-F3 and you're out
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
mode
let t_EI=\Esc]50;CursorShape=0\x7
I tried this and it worked great in konsole vim, but when I went to
compose an email in mutt it made the font in the whole window too tiny
to read so I backed it out.
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:45:01AM +0200, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 18/09/12 22:00, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Patch 7.3.666
[...]
For some reason the Subject line of this email (as it reached me)
was truncated. The body text was correct though. I wonder if it is
due to the fact that the patch
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 06:03:59PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Patch 7.3.421
Problem:Get E832 when setting 'undofile' in vimrc and there is a file to
be edited on the command line. (Toothpik)
Solution: Do not try reading the undo file for a file that wasn't loaded.
Files:
right there -- you are contradicting my
understanding and my experience -- if i do not set mapleader,
and install a plugin that defines a leader mapping, i can
invoke it using the default '\' mapleader
before we set out to complicate things, can we have a premise
that doesn't set off alarms?
sc
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 04:51:13AM -0800, Mikey wrote:
On Jan 22, 11:39 pm, Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 22/01/12 22:12, Mikey wrote:
Hi,
I use GVim ver. 7.3.154 with GTK2 GUI on Slackware 13.37. During page
down/up scrolling with
this, but I suspect it has something to
do with distribution maintainers creating and restoring sessions in
global vimrc settings (in /etc).
if your 'viminfo' includes an 'h' this will not happen -- see
:h 'viminfo'
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top
that doesn't come up
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
how to earn the right to vote for
features?
a related question: have you done it?
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
On Wednesday, September 28, 2011 08:02:05 Tony Mechelynck wrote:
- netrw is installed, which is normally the case unless you
run Vim with either -u NONE or --noplugin
...or you have
let g:loaded_netrw = 1
in your .vimrc
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do
and compose a
vim script to call it
plugin authors come in all shapes and varieties and you open
yourself to inconsistencies and glitches by installing them
just my opinion, as i said
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you
this happens on linux too -- got message:
Vim: Caught deadly signal SEGV
in the terminal from which i started the session
[vim version 7.3.315]
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
On Friday, July 15, 2011 10:56:31 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Patch 7.3.252 (after 7.3.247)
Problem:Tests fail. (David Northfield)
Solution: Add missing update for .ok file.
Files: src/testdir/test81.ok
now, for me, only 51 fails
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev
On Friday, July 15, 2011 11:45:37 sc wrote:
On Friday, July 15, 2011 10:56:31 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Patch 7.3.252 (after 7.3.247)
Problem:Tests fail. (David Northfield)
Solution: Add missing update for .ok file.
Files: src/testdir/test81.ok
now, for me, only 51 fails
weird
life (long
time) and IMHO it reads fine without a comma
it's starting to sound to me as if someone's got too much time
on their hands
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http
On Monday, June 27, 2011 11:49:15 Mike Williams wrote:
On 27/06/2011 16:57, sc wrote:
On Monday, June 27, 2011 04:43:23 v...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #2 on issue 16 by shlomif: [PATCH] Missing comma in
usr_10.txt http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=16
It does not read
with --noplugin to see if numbers act right then
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
appear in my update log
i guess my update (pull) needs a verbosity option
thanx
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
was
the last actual one in there
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 13:43:52 Gary Johnson wrote:
Thanks for your work on sh.vim. I've installed it but I don't
use it very often, so I won't be good source of feedback.
i'm using it, and so far so good -- will be glad to report back
if i find issues
sc
--
You received this message
jeff--
would it be possible to add support for g:no_plugin_maps to
bufexplorer?
it is mentioned in filetype.txt and there's an example of how
to use it in usr_41.txt
thanx,
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you
On Sunday, May 08, 2011 08:03:22 Lech Lorens wrote:
I followed the steps suggested by sc in
201105031238.26558.tooth...@swbell.net in the discussion
about scrolling with scrolloff and lines set to certain
values and added one more step.
I do:
vim -u NONE -U NONE
:r!seq 100
:set lines=25
through the file one line at a time
as it should, but the scrolloffset is not keeping current line
in the same place as one might expect
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http
on that subject around that date.
i confirm this: for me j moves one line in the above
circumstance
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
this?
for me it deleted the one letter word and the preceding space,
as it is supposed to -- maybe todo.txt simply needs that to be
deleted
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
thank you very much
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
autochdir
in your _vimrc and see if the behavior is closer to what you
expect
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
On Tuesday 15 February 2011 12:57:54 sc wrote:
is git locked up?
i got a successful hg pull, but trying to hg merge just hangs
sorry for the noise -- my merge script was hiding a
use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? getting .hgignore
message from me -- my bad
sc
--
You received
adventurous, i tried this exact thing on my (suse
linux 11.2) box and no bomb for me, just 66 tab pages with
numbers for labels
my vim is Big, 7.3.112, with GTK2 gui
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying
of `[' in collections
Please split this up in patches for individual maintainers and
send it to each of them. Yes, that's a lot of work, but the
only way to make sure the next version a maintainer sends
will undo this change.
s/undo/not undo/
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do
:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/linux-
jdk1.3.1/bin:/usr/local/lib/python2.2/Tools/idle is empty.
is what it looks like in 'hg incoming'
tee hee
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
it seems
like you're using patched sources and there's something wrong
with the patching.
in my copy of a freshly updated 7.3.050 source it's assigned
to at 3293, and defined at 3171 as a pointer to char_u
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply
i still like to run heads and
'cs' to verify it is naming the changeset i deem relevant
before i attempt using it to merge, and i recommend anyone
else using it do the same, at least until things settle down
and get a little more predictable
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev
commit $@ ../update.log
hg commit $@ 21 | tee -a ../update.log
fi
dsh ../update.log
as you may guess, my first pull i call 'u', so for me a simple
update is as simple as u, u2 `cs`, u3
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text
.
unless and until runtime/doc/tags needs a commit, in which
case you'll need an extra commit between the pull and the
merge
i keep thinking it should be easy to write an expect script to
test for merge success and automating that, but i'm too new to
expect for it to be easy for me
sc
--
You
On Monday 09 August 2010 21:43:41 Vlad Irnov wrote:
But it's really Normal. I get +persistent_undo after compiling
Normal version on Windows with MinGW.
i get it after compiling Big version on linux with gcc
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type
changeset for me was 2432 -- that
number is different for everybody -- you must use the horking
and unambiguous 0371401d9d33
sorry to go off topic
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information
over that -- i love clean code and
have no use for GTK-1 support
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
, the vim73 branch showing Bram's 0e0e99d1092e, and the
original start
hg status shows two files:
M runtime/doc/tags
M src/auto/config.mk
nothing surprising there
any help will be appreciated
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text
, that was exactly the step i was missing
and thank you, james, i will examine those links in an attempt to
educate myself
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org
using kde 4.3.5 konsole
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
, a mainstream reality
dunno why you like that 'fetch' better, but for me the
pull/update work famously
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
names but with the same content?
7.2.434==7.3.001
7.2.435==7.3.002
7.2.436==7.3.003
i believe he does quite enough as it is, and i do not go looking
for ways to make it more complicated for him
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post
to pick up the
change from the default branch in the vim73 branch. Not as
nice, but works.
i had to add a -C to the update to get to the new branch, so
hg update -C vim73
got me there
i can build it but i don't see relative numbers in it -- did that
feature not make the cut?
sc
list--
i am unable to navigate to
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html
is there a problem?
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org
On Wednesday 12 May 2010 1:42:32 pm Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2010-05-12, sc wrote:
list-- lWi am unable to navigate to
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html
is there a problem?
If you navigate up to the site page,
http://mysite.verizon.net/, you'll see
settings with environment vars,
there is always a chance there is a variable you didn't
expect it to be there.
i've already got a 'myconfig' script that spells out these things
as proper commandline arguments -- it works famously
sorry for the noise
sc
--
You received this message from
GTK2 which it figured
out on its own
do these now have to be specified on the commandline? or maybe
i've suffered yet another brain flatulation and overlooked some
necessary and obvious step?
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http
patch and never looked back
he's got the runtime in his too
unless and until that patch is adopted mainstream i'll be
sticking with git (unless markus stops maintaining it for some
reason)
sc
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http
to qualify this with is that i know about the vim_extended
repo at repo.or.cz, but it's branch system seems a bit odd.
odd schmod
+1 markus' git repo
of course i can't claim to be objective -- i am a fan of his
relatiive number patch -- but if i can figure it out and use it,
so can you
sc
--
You
linux 10.2
have you re-introduced old bugs, or have i found a new way
to trick it? or
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 10:34 am, sc wrote:
charles--
again i find myself struggling to maintain my own
formatoptions settings through uses of netrw
netrw version: v134
formatoptions before using netrw: tcq
formatoptions after using netrw: nroql2
method of netrw
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 12:04 pm, Charles Campbell wrote:
sc wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 10:34 am, sc wrote:
charles--
again i find myself struggling to maintain my own
formatoptions settings through uses of netrw
netrw version: v134
formatoptions before
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 3:14 pm, Charles Campbell wrote:
OK, I see the problem now...
Thank you for the script!
Chip Campbell
my pleasure -- i take it the ^Ms survived intact
let me know if there's anything more i can do to help...
sc
of the way
different people like to work.
/oldsong
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Sunday 16 November 2008 2:34 pm, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
sc, 15.11.2008:
I finally bit the bullet and applied Markus Heidelberg's relative number
patch to my source -- I love it so much I added
Nice to hear.
With subversion you don't have to reapply the patch. When working
against the list of files, and re-apply the pieces of the patch
that got overridden, but I can't help thinking there must be a better way.
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org
to browse this group -- what he'll use to find Xavier's kind response to my
whining I'm not sure, I just hope the experience doesn't turn him into
an emacs user
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit
. It's on top of
version 7.2.28 (subversion revision 1226).
I hope the above is a typo -- for me subversion reports revision 1226
while vim is at 7.2.26
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http
. It's on top of
version 7.2.28 (subversion revision 1226).
oops -- please forgive the double post -- I so often hit Send and
then engage my brain
revision 1226 did indeed update my source to 7.2.28 but as it
stands it will not compile for me (already noted in a previous
post)
sc
:
ex_cmds.h:656: error: 'ex_oldfiles' undeclared here (not in a function)
make[1]: *** [objects/ex_docmd.o] Error 1
Further, my line 657 in ex_cmds.h is exactly as quoted above.
I may well be stuck at 7.2.26 until this is resolved...
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
, as opposed to installing a
plugin that's been vimballed?
so, no, i haven't tried your patch, sorry, call me lazy
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:50, Charles Campbell wrote:
sc wrote:
thank *you* -- it looks really useful
now can you help me make a toggle for it, so i don't need to
burn two mappings for it? like for example instead of
saying RltvNmbr is already enabled, which i can plainly
see
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 09:50, Charles Campbell wrote:
sc wrote:
thank *you* -- it looks really useful
now can you help me make a toggle for it, so i don't need to
burn two mappings for it? like for example instead of
saying RltvNmbr is already enabled, which i can plainly
see
it on vim.sf.net. I'd like to
mention the relative numbering patch in my document -- would someone
please tell me where that patch is again?
And, as you may notice, I think I've now got a way to respond again to
messages on the mailing list.
why is the section labeled Rndm?
sc
On Monday 18 August 2008 20:39, Charles E. Campbell, Jr. wrote:
sc wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2008 15:15, Charles Campbell wrote:
Hello!
I've issued a new plugin on my website:
http://mysite.verizon.net/astronaut/vim/index.html#RLTVNMBR . It uses
why is the section
On Friday 20 June 2008 23:27, sc wrote:
On Friday 20 June 2008 17:27, sc wrote:
all--
i've only just begun attempting to run 'make test' to see
testing in action, and i am apparently missing something
very basic -- my test fails almost immediately in test4 with
indented columns
on the
vim site, run helpgrep, poked around tony's site, but still
if there are instructions for a first time tester they are
eluding me
can someone point me in the right direction?
tia,
sc
vim version 7.1.315
os suse linux 10.2
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Friday 20 June 2008 17:27, sc wrote:
all--
i've only just begun attempting to run 'make test' to see
testing in action, and i am apparently missing something
very basic -- my test fails almost immediately in test4 with
indented columns that are supposed to start in column one
i've
! vim: filetype=help fileencoding=latin1
if this patch is applied will that mean we can take the
au BufReadPost ada.txt setl nomodeline ft=help
out of our .vimrcs that tony had us add?
well -- i *think* it was tony...
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
we can only hope they will think to quit and execute
'vimtutor' from the shell prompt as they did in the first
place
we can also hope we don't inspire an early distrust of an
editor that leads you into a blind alley when you try your
darndest to follow the first instructions they give you
sc
screenshots:
http://www.silent-blade.org/misc/gvim-notebook-before.png
http://www.silent-blade.org/misc/gvim-notebook-after.png
Comments are welcome :-)
I like it better without the icons -- they take up room, and
are not useful.
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
useful
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
all--
i don't believe i've ever before gotten
svn: REPORT request failed on '/svnroot/vim/!svn/vcc/default'
svn: Can't find a temporary directory: Error string not
specified yet
when i checked for a new patch level
is something down?
sc
On Saturday 23 February 2008 10:21, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
sc wrote:
all--
i don't believe i've ever before gotten
svn: REPORT request failed on
'/svnroot/vim/!svn/vcc/default' svn: Can't find a
temporary directory: Error string not specified yet
when i checked for a new patch
On Saturday 23 February 2008 12:16, James Vega wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:04:02PM -0600, sc wrote:
On Saturday 23 February 2008 10:21, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
sc wrote:
all--
i don't believe i've ever before gotten
svn: REPORT request failed on
'/svnroot/vim
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 15:04, Nick Gravgaard wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:47:29 -0600, sc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wednesday 13 February 2008 11:33, Nick Gravgaard wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:26:00 -0700, Erik Falor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
:.,+23d
How does
to go
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
tabs/windows
that's something i've wished for too -- i always figured it
was my ignorance preventing me from deleting buffers without
closing the split window that's holding it
sc
Scanning the votelist, it appears that it is a bit
inhomogeneous. The topics range from 1
for too -- i always
figured it was my ignorance preventing me from deleting
buffers without closing the split window that's holding
it
I'd like to have that too.
Nico
Is this close enough?
:command BDP bp | bd #
:command BDN bn | bd #
~Matt
works for me -- thanx!
sc
or extremely low.
Which is not the habit in this newsgroup.
Zdenek--
traffic is light but not non-existant -- I have 3 emails dated
Oct 10, 1 dated Oct 9, 4 from Oct 7, etc
when you want to verify you are getting the emails you can
look in googlegroups on google to see the list there
sc
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 07:11, VB wrote:
big snip
lovely -- spam on vim_dev -- please tell me we don't need a
moderator
sc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org
85 matches
Mail list logo
