Hello,
Just pulled 7.4a28, after having successfully build 7.4a.24.
Build failed with this at the end:
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
_find_win_for_buf, referenced from:
_RBAppend in if_python.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
collect2: ld returned 1 exit
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Manuel Ortega mannyvim...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
Just pulled 7.4a28, after having successfully build 7.4a.24.
Build failed with this at the end:
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
_find_win_for_buf, referenced from:
_RBAppend
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Gary Johnson garyj...@spocom.com wrote:
I just noticed this today with 7.4b but the behavior is the same
with 7.4a.9. It works correctly with 7.3.882.
The problem is that when I open a temporary file created by mutt
with the name /tmp/muttV1LGjR, the latest
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Manuel Ortega mannyvim...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Gary Johnson garyj...@spocom.com wrote:
This should be detected by both of the following patterns in
$VIMRUNTIME/filetype.vim:
mutt[[:alnum:]_-]\{6\}
mutt[[:alnum:]._-]\{6
There is a horrendous bug wrt the 'g~' operator. I've found it on OSX
10.8.4. Doesn't matter whether it's MacVim 7.4b or Vim 7.4b.18.
To reproduce: Make a new file with three lines:
-
a
b
-
(The middle line is empty, and there's no trailing whitespace after a
There are at least two bugs in vim syntax highlighting. It occurs when one
leaves out optional spaces in a List or Dictionary.
For example:
let foo = ['one','two','three']
shows distractingly bizarre highlighting. The second and third elements
have only their first letter colored, and that
Sorry, forgot to include this info: I'm on OSX 10.8.4, with Vim 7.4.005.
The bug also appear in MacVim 7.4.
-Manny
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Charles Campbell
charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov wrote
The problem is discriminating between marks and strings. My solution
has been to reduce the number of items detected as marks and to favor
strings. Please try
Dear Bram,
While perusing $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/vim.vim, I noticed that many of the
attributes to the command :command can be abbreviated. Namely:
instance:
-n[args]
-com[plete]
-ra[nge]
-cou[nt]
-re[gister]
-ban[g]
I didn't ever know this before. No wonder! As far as I can
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Manuel Ortega mannyvim...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear Bram,
While perusing $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/vim.vim, I noticed that many of the
attributes to the command :command can be abbreviated. Namely:
instance:
-n[args]
-com[plete]
-ra[nge]
-cou[nt
As noted in an earlier thread, I discovered that most attributes to
:command can be abbreviated. I discovered this only by accident, looking
in syntax/vim.vim.
Turns out, in that syntax file (a) there is no support for the attribute
-buffer (for buflocal commands), and (b) trial and error
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Charles Campbell
charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
So Dr. Chip, please add this attribute to the syntax file.
And Bram, please note this in the docs about -buffer too.
This is not really intended to work that way. It happens that
## Reason
It is quite annoying when you use auto-completion plugins
like YouCompleteMe or neocomplete.
## Related Discussion:
-
https://github.com/Valloric/YouCompleteMe/issues/642#issuecomment-27711342
-
+ nowait Do not wait another longer mappings
+(|:map-nowait|).
This isn't quite English. Perhaps Do not wait to see whether the user is
entering a longer {lhs} before triggering the map?
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev
On Mo, 09 Dez 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Christian Brabandt wrote:
I use an uppercase mark to access a blowfish encrypted file. I
therefore :bwipe that buffer when I'm done with this file.
Unfortunately, I can't use the uppercase mark again, to reload
that file, Vim throws E92
Now, since lowercase marks are associated with the *buffer* and not the
*file*, I would in fact expect :bwipe to zap those.
Huh? Lowercase marks are associated with *files*. In the .viminfo file,
where the lowercase marks are, each one is associated with a pathname,
i.e., a file. (It's just
Now, since lowercase marks are associated with the *buffer* and not the
*file*, I would in fact expect :bwipe to zap those.
Huh? Lowercase marks are associated with *files*. In the .viminfo file,
where the lowercase marks are, each one is associated with a pathname,
i.e., a file.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 4:00:22 PM UTC-6, Manuel Ortega wrote:
Now, since lowercase marks are associated with the *buffer* and not
the *file*, I would in fact expect :bwipe to zap those.
Huh? Lowercase
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:10:07 PM UTC-6, Manuel Ortega wrote:
I never said it would make 'b magically jump to my profile if I'm
currently looking at something that isn't my profile. I said
lowercase marks are associated with files. And each lowercase
mark a-z is a mark
The autocommand events TextChanged* do not appear in the short list of
autocommand events that begins on line 201 of autocmd.txt.
-Manny
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Manuel Ortega mannyvim...@gmail.comwrote:
The autocommand events TextChanged* do not appear in the short list of
autocommand events that begins on line 201 of autocmd.txt.
-Manny
Never mind, my bad. I was using MacVim, which is several patches behind
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Aaron Bohannon a...@google.com wrote:
To reproduce (on standard *nix installation):
(1) start vim in your home directory
(2) :cd .vim
(3) :echo findfile('.vimrc', expand('$USER') . ';')
In vim 7.3, you get something like /home/$USER/.vimrc.
In vim 7.4,
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Mosh moshah...@gmail.com wrote:
All builtin vim operations should be named for 2 reasons:
1. if you map a key, then the original command binding is unavailable:
example: :map [ 0..
Now how do I call [c in diff mode; [c doesn't have a name.
Part of your addition contains a typo.
It should be these commands, not this commands.
-Manny
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You
I get a similar warning over and over when I ran make test after building
7.4.241. That is, I get that warning inside the running of the tests, and
test82 fails.
I tried reconfiguring with --disable-smack, but that didn't change
anything.
This is on a GNU/Linux virtual host. I am not seeing
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Manuel Ortega mannyvim...@gmail.com wrote:
I get a similar warning over and over when I ran make test after
building 7.4.241. That is, I get that warning inside the running of the
tests, and test82 fails.
I tried reconfiguring with --disable-smack
The culprit is 7.4.238.
Patch 7.4.244 seems to have fixed it; thanks!
-Manny
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Andrew andrey.ra...@gmail.com wrote:
Given a text file with the following two lines:
first line
second line
If you now go to the second line and yank it, then go to the first line
and type in
_ddp
What I'd expect to happen is:
second
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Jacob Niehus jacob.nie...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I have found that meta key mappings do not work properly when used in a
recording/macro or the :normal command. This happens in both terminal and
GUI Vim so I don't think it's a key code issue.
Steps to
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Robert Arkwright rarkwri...@gmail.comwrote:
I may have discovered a bug with relative line numbers in Vim 7.4.
To reproduce:
* Launch Vim with default configuration (no ~/.vimrc or ~/.vim directory).
* Immediately enter insert mode (i).
* Enter ten lines of
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Teemu Ikonen tpiko...@gmail.com wrote:
Filtering a line which is currently folded results in the whole fold being
filtered. For example, take a 2-line file like below with set
foldmethod=marker:
one {{{1
two
Issuing the command ':2!echo foo', when the fold
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Muhittin Bilginer
muhittin.bilgi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have been desperately trying to build MacVim against a custom Python
framework with no luck so far. I have tried many things, at the end MacVim
builds with no errors, but when I check the linking of
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Ron Aaron wrote:
To repro the issue:
gvim -u NONE somefile
:sp
50G
Now switch to the second window
C-WW
And resize it:
C-W+
Note that the first window will jump back to line 1
On Saturday, May 18, 2013 7:15:27 AM UTC-4, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
runtime/doc/tags is under Mercurial control:
$ hg locate runtime/doc/tags
runtime/doc/tags
This file is automatically generated during vim build.
It is annoying to have it appear sometimes in the output of 'hg
Dear Bram,
Now that there is no longer pressure to quickly cram everything in to avoid
patchlevel 1000 and up (too late), shouldn't the regex engine stuff and the
flurry of pythoniana be moved into a 7.4beta branch, or vim-experimental
branch or something like that?
There is just so much build
I got a compiler warning on OSX 10.8.3 that I've never seen before. This
is while building 7.3.1072. The last vim I built was 7.3.1053 and this
warning didn't exist then.
gcc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DMACOS_X_UNIX -no-cpp-precomp -g -O2
-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 -o
Hello,
I just pulled and built 7.3.1154. A 'make test' failed, apparently on test
86. I see the following:
Test results: test86 NO OUTPUT
I've almost never run make test before, and it's never failed for me. Is
there something else I need to look at that should be reported here?
-Manny
--
I can't reproduce on OS X 10.8.4, using MacVim, which is at 7.3.1168. I
don't get what matches the .png file; I get the same colors whether re=1 or
re=2.
I can't test console vim because the file lang.vim only defines gui colors.
Therefore, I see no highlighting no matter what.
-Manny
On
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Dominique Pellé
dominique.pe...@gmail.comwrote:
Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Axel Bender wrote:
you may as well elimitate the inverted question mark (I just forgot to
replace it in the example - in the base document there are no xs), the
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Patch 7.3.1183
Problem:Python tests 86 and 87 fail.
Solution: Add empty files. (ZyX)
Files: src/testdir/python_before/before_1.py,
src/testdir/python_before/before_2.py
***
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Manuel Ortega wrote:
Something's up with hg. I did 'hg pull -u' to get this commit, but those
empty files are not actually put into the working dir. 'hg sum' tells me
that indeed I did receive 7.3.1183
Buried in that gist file is a line that shows the OP is using a beta
version of XCode5, which won't come out until OS X 10.9 comes out.
Possibly the OP is building on a beta of OSX10.9 as well. If you look at
the issues page of, e.g., the homebrew website (
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dominique Pellé
dominique.pe...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
These 2 commands which only differ by using re=1 or re=2
do not highlight the same text. It's correct with re=2 and
incorrect with re=1 (with re=1, the second line is not
entirely highlighted, but it
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Manuel Ortega mannyvim...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Dominique Pellé
dominique.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
These 2 commands which only differ by using re=1 or re=2
do not highlight the same text. It's correct with re=2 and
incorrect
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Christian Wellenbrock
christian.wellenbr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, June 14, 2013 10:35:59 PM UTC+2, Manuel Ortega wrote:
Buried in that gist file is a line that shows the OP is using a beta
version of XCode5, which won't come out until OS X 10.9 comes
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Charles Campbell
charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov wrote:
Sounds like nasty stuff. Two problems:
1. There is no isk+=: in syntax/vim.vim v7.3-25
Not here either.
2. My copy of ftplugin/vim.vim, which I don't maintain, also does not have
isk+=: in it.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Andy Wokula wrote:
Am 26.06.2013 20:04, schrieb Bram Moolenaar:
Patch 7.3.1249
Problem:Modeline not recognized when using Vim instead of vim.
Solution: Also accept Vim.
Files: src/buffer.c
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ingo Karkat sw...@ingo-karkat.de wrote:
Hello Vim developers,
I noticed a regression:
$ vim -N -u NONE
:echo foo
The intro message is cleared, the (now empty) UI does not show foo.
Expected behavior: The intro message stays visible, the command-line
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Kazunobu Kuriyama
kazunobu.kuriy...@nifty.com wrote:
That said, the vim shipped with MacOS X 10.8.4, the version of which is
7.3 and looks no patch applied, not linked against X11, works well. This
suggests that the early patch-levels of 7.3 are free from this
1. command /usr/local/bin/vim -nNX -u NONE
Bram,
I looked at this and didn't remember offhand what the '-X' flag did. No
wonder: 'vim --help' has no entry for that flag. But ':h startup-options'
*does* say what the flag does. Please update the output of 'vim --help'.
I shall now hunt for
Hello,
In $VIMRUNTIME/filetype.vim there is no entry for .rockspec files
(luarocks).
I think all it takes is:
Luarocks
au BufNewFile,BufRead *.rockspec setf lua
-Manny
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Manuel Ortega wrote
In $VIMRUNTIME/filetype.vim there is no entry for .rockspec files
(luarocks).
I think all it takes is:
Luarocks
au BufNewFile,BufRead *.rockspec setf lua
That's easy to add.
I'm
Unsure if this is a bug or what.
Do this in a new console vim instance (console version of MacVim will
show it too, though I am NOT reporting a MacVim problem to the wrong
list):
:redir = foo
:!ls -l
:redir END
:echo foo
What I expect is to see the usual ls listing of the current dir
contents.
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org
wrote:
Hi Mikhail!
On Sa, 27 Sep 2014, Mikhail V wrote:
Greetings,
I am totally new to the discussion groups, so i'm sorry in advance if
there are already solutions to my problem. And I was not able to attach
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Marco Hinz mh.code...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I suppose there is something to say for both ways. What do the
users prefer?
I understand that such visual changes are almost always controversial,
especially for such a long-lasting editor with its big
On Monday, September 29, 2014 4:55:55 PM UTC-4, Israel Chauca F. wrote:
On 9/29/14, 12:09 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Well, I suppose there is something to say for both ways. What do users
prefer?
I prefer the proposed look. I think that it looks cleaner when the
columns end where
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Marco Hinz mh.code...@gmail.com wrote:
The screenshot attached to the proposal doesn't show the case when
all four of the highlight groups have the same background color. In
that case, the proposal looks bizarre.
In that case it wouldn't look bizarre, but
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Andi Hafner a.haf...@kmu-net.ch wrote:
Doing so, I also realized that there is no built in horizontal equivalent
to CTRL-W_= (make all windows equal height), i.e. a command to make all
windows equal width. Am I right or did I miss something? (I'm speaking
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Charles Campbell
charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov wrote:
Hello:
Please try the following on a linux system:
mkdir PROBLEM
cd PROBLEM
ln -s file1 file2
Doing ls shows file2 exists (but it points to a non-existing file).
Fire up vim:
vim -u NONE -N
Sorry if this is a repeat of something already known. On OS X 10.10.1, Vim
7.4.608 will have make test fail:
Test results:
test_eval FAILED
TEST FAILURE
make[2]: *** [report] Error 1
make[1]: *** [test] Error 2
make: *** [test] Error 2
The portion of that file that seems to indicate what
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Kazunobu Kuriyama
kazunobu.kuriy...@nifty.com wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 28, 2015, at 11:33, Manuel Ortega mannyvim...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry if this is a repeat of something already known. On OS X 10.10.1,
Vim 7.4.608 will have make test fail:
Test results
The vim syntax file included in the hg repo was just updated. But by
looking at the diffs, it appears that it went from version 7.4-27 backwards
to 7.4-19. Is that right? Or is it a typo in the version number?
-Manny
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not
There are a lot of people saying Github is better than Bitbucket for reasons
XYZ, therefore we should move to Github.
The problem is that moving to Github means Bram and the rest of us have to
switch to git. The problem here is not git itself, but the switching. The
path of minimum
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Since Google Code is going to be shut down we need a new place for the
Vim repository. Many users have given their opinion and github appears
to be the preferred site.
Darn.
It would be nice if, when this gets
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Dominique Pellé dominique.pe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Manuel Ortega mannyvim...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be nice if, when this gets finalized, the new repo trims out
ancient stuff like 7.0, 7.1, and 7.2. There's no reason for everyone to
have to clone all
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Ingo Karkat sw...@ingo-karkat.de wrote:
Bram already is a bottleneck in development; please don't make him
work harder by adding yet more complexity in repo maintenance!
It's quite obvious that almost nobody on this list cares about adding
complexity for
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Peter Aronoff telemac...@arpinum.org
wrote:
On Friday, March 27th, 2015 at 9:11AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Kana Natsuno wrote:
On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 5:00:19 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Isn't there a way to clone only up to some time ago,
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Patch 7.4.654
Problem:glob() and globpath() cannot include links to non-existing
files.
(Charles Campbell)
Solution: Add an argument to include all links with glob(). (James McCoy)
Also
This is just a reminder that whenever this gets patched, the VimL function
globpath() also needs to receive the same repair.
-Manny
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Manuel Ortega wrote:
I cloned the new testing repo from github.
When I do git log and scroll through the results, I find that
multi-line
log messages that look fine in the hg repo are a bit mangled
We can't forget either that a MAJOR part of the Vim plugin ecosystem lives
on Github already.
I don't know why people keep bringing this up. It's (a) not even clear
that it is true, and (b) even if it is true, it strikes me as completely
irrelevant to the question of where to host vim. Who
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Manuel Ortega wrote:
I cloned the new testing repo from github.
When I do git log and scroll through the results, I find that
multi-line
log messages that look fine in the hg repo are a bit mangled
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Bruno Sutic bruno.su...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, we haven't even seen *that* reason. All we've seen is it makes
the vocal git users happy. I don't know why people keep saying the
majority of vim users prefer git/github. This has in no way been
established.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:44 PM, James McCoy james...@jamessan.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 2015 5:03 PM, John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:26 AM, James McCoy james...@jamessan.com
wrote:
[snip]
$ git gc --aggressive
...
$ du -hs .git .
34M
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Roland Eggner ed...@systemanalysen.net
wrote:
Hi Christian!
On 2015-04-20 Monday at 10:38 +0200 Christian Brabandt wrote:
Am 2015-04-20 09:24, schrieb Bidit Mazumder:
If gui=bold is not present in the hi StatusLine of the active
color scheme, then the
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Bidit Mazumder bidit.mazum...@gmail.com
wrote:
If gui=bold is not present in the hi StatusLine of the active color
scheme, then the status line does not render a background color.
I don't know if this is a Vim issue or a MacVim issue.
It's neither. I can't
The most recent two log messages (for patches, not tags) are messed up.
They now look horrible in both `hg log` AND `git log`.
In `hg log`, in an 80-column terminal, I see
patch 7.4.690 for Problem: Memory access errors when changing indent in Ex
mode.
redraw when using CTRL-U. (Knil
Assuming this github move is going to be permanent...
The new format of commit messages makes the Problem: line really long in
some cases. While `hg log` doesn't soft-wrap lines in its display, `git
log` does not, which makes its output really hard to read.
Bram, I agree that `git log` stinks,
Doing :h diffoff gives:
The :diffoff command resets the relevant options to the values they
had when using |:diffsplit|, |:diffpatch| , |:diffthis|. or starting Vim
in diff mode. Otherwise they are set to their default value:
'diff' off
'scrollbind'off
'cursorbind'
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:09 AM, James McCoy james...@jamessan.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:55:12PM -0400, Manuel Ortega wrote:
Vim 7.4.738 here, Mac OSX 10.10.3. (Not MacVim, although the below is
reproducible there too).
Either the \_ regexp construct is broken, or the docs
Vim 7.4.738 here, Mac OSX 10.10.3. (Not MacVim, although the below is
reproducible there too).
Either the \_ regexp construct is broken, or the docs are badly
misleading. I don't know which. The following problem seems
independent of re=1 or re=2. I always use re=1.
Open a new, empty vim
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:23 PM, mattn mattn...@gmail.com wrote:
-
-1
1
-
select two lines, and type C-A or C-X. vim will crash.
Happens on OS X too.
-Manny
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. August 2015, 23:15:14 schrieb Markus Heidelberg:
Am Mittwoch, 19. August 2015, 21:35:52 schrieb Bram Moolenaar:
I cloned it - it is perfect :)
For some reason on
One of the commits today broke installation on OS X 10.11.1.
'make install' bombs out with the following:
--8<--
if test -d /usr/local/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps -a -w
/usr/local/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps \
-a ! -f
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Urtica dioica
gaultheria.shal...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had some time to play with this patch.
1. Let's crash Vim.
snip
2. Visual areas change from dot repeats. gv can confirm the changed areas.
I can confirm each of these two cases on OSX.
Perhaps the
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Ken Takata ktakata65...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bram,
2015/8/31 Mon 1:35:30 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I don't see a way in GitHub to have some text show up when using the
New issue button. There doesn't even seem to be a way to have some
kind of issue
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Manuel Ortega <mannyvim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Patch 7.4.860
>> Problem:Filetype detection is outdated.
>> Solution: Include all
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Patch 7.4.860
> Problem:Filetype detection is outdated.
> Solution: Include all recent and not-so-recent changes.
> Files: runtime/filetype.vim
>
>
Somehow the actual patch didn't make it to GitHub. On the
In the case of mercurial, there's no need to make branches or merges in
order to solve this problem. Just add the following to $REPO/.hg/hgrc:
[hooks]
pre-status = hg revert runtime/doc/tags
pre-update = hg revert runtime/doc/tags
pre-pull = hg revert runtime/doc/tags
I'm about to investigate
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelb...@web.de
> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 10. September 2015, 14:33:37 schrieb Manuel Ortega:
> > In the case of mercurial, there's no need to make branches or merges in
> > order to solve this problem. Just add t
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Olaf Dabrunz <o...@fctrace.org> wrote:
> On 10-Sep-15, Manuel Ortega wrote:
> > In the case of mercurial, there's no need to make branches or merges in
> order to solve this problem. Just add the following to
> > $REPO/.hg/hgrc:
> &
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Kenichi Ito wrote:
>
> > After this patch, test_listlbr_utf8 fails on travis-ci.
> > https://travis-ci.org/vim/vim/builds/94633493
> >
> > 54,56c54,56
> > < ¶
> > < a b c¶
> > < a b c¶
> > ---
> > > ¶
> >
I just built 7.4.1055. Then I did 'make test'. I get the following
nonsense:
test1 FAILED - terminal size must be 80x24 or larger
My terminal is 80x25. Also, I didn't get this message one or two days ago,
even though my terminal size hasn't been modified.
This is on Mac OS X 10.11.2, using
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Manuel Ortega <mannyvim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just built 7.4.1055. Then I did 'make test'. I get the following
> nonsense:
>
> test1 FAILED - terminal size must be 80x24 or larger
>
> My terminal is 80x25. Also, I didn't get this messa
What's wrong with making :RuntimeUpdate just make the appropriate rsync
call? That's how I used to keep $VIMRUNTIME up to date way back when. OS
X, at least, comes with rsync built in.
-Manny
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below
AmaruCoder,
If I understand the situation correctly, ZyX is saying that two things are
combining to create the behavior you observe. One is that somewhere between
Vim 7.4.712 and Vim 7.4.922 the English spell files acquired the non-ASCII
apostrophes. Two is that whatever font you're using is
On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 8:12:46 PM UTC-5, Nikolai Aleksandrovich Pavlov
wrote:
> These do not look like incorrect entries. They look like they are using
> unicode apostroph and used font does not have the necessary glyph. I would
> say that entries with ’ (U+2019, RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Manuel Ortega <mannyvim...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> This is on Mac OS X 10.11.5, with the very latest Vim. I can reproduce
> with both MacVim and the "regular" X11 gVim.
>
> Setting causes some strange display artifacts in the GUI,
> w
This is on Mac OS X 10.11.5, with the very latest Vim. I can reproduce
with both MacVim and the "regular" X11 gVim.
Setting causes some strange display artifacts in the GUI,
when one uses "!" to run a shell cmd. A bizarre suffix is appended to
the filename that replaces "%".
To reproduce, in
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Manuel Ortega <mannyvim...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:48 AM, Kazunobu Kuriyama <
> kazunobu.kuriy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I couldn't reproduce the bug with Athena, GTK+ 2, GTK+ 3 GUIs, but did
>> with MacVim
1 - 100 din 228 matches
Mail list logo