Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Friday, May 24, 2013 2:47:18 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Please also write tests. Lots of bugs slipped through because we don't
have sufficient testing.
https://gist.github.com/mattn/5626661
I added test96
Great, thanks.
I fixed all the known
On Friday, May 24, 2013 2:47:18 AM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Please also write tests. Lots of bugs slipped through because we don't
have sufficient testing.
https://gist.github.com/mattn/5626661
I added test96
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post!
Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
OK, I'll do it.
However I doubt that there are some cases that new regexp engine is
slower than original. This change make be possible to work with html
file syntax, but re=2 seems to be slower than re=1.
The NFA engine is known to be slower on simple patterns, but
Bram, I fixed:
* \%#
* \%23c \%23l
* \%23c \%23l
* \%23c \%23l
* Treat leading * as star character
* \_[
* \@!
https://gist.github.com/mattn/5626661
Please check this patch.
- Yasuhiro Matsumoto
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply
As I've said: having vim read plugin/*.vim files and adding some
runtimepath/python-lib dir if it exists to sys.dir would be genious.
Then people could use plugin/plugin.py only and have it lazily load its
code using import
Marc Weber
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:47:20 PM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Friday is the deadline for new features and larger changes. After that
it's bug fixing only!
Friday in 8 days, I assume, not Friday tomorrow?
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not
Ben Fritz wrote:
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:47:20 PM UTC-5, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Friday is the deadline for new features and larger changes. After that
it's bug fixing only!
Friday in 8 days, I assume, not Friday tomorrow?
Yes, end of May.
--
Hanson's Treatment of
OK, I'll do it.
However I doubt that there are some cases that new regexp engine is
slower than original. This change make be possible to work with html
file syntax, but re=2 seems to be slower than re=1.
On 5/24/13, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi, Bram
I found NFA regexp engine bug.
Prerequisite
vim 7.3.1004
set re=0
How to reproduce
vim -N -u NONE -i NONE --noplugin
oEsc
/\n*or /\_.*
Actual
gone infinite loop.
How to take back control. (on linux)
pgrep -lf
kill -9 nnn -- nnn is vim process number checked by pgrep.
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Di, 21 Mai 2013, Christian Brabandt wrote:
And also not supported yet are \_[...]
collections.
BTW: This patch enables the \_[...] collections.
diff --git a/src/regexp_nfa.c b/src/regexp_nfa.c
--- a/src/regexp_nfa.c
+++ b/src/regexp_nfa.c
@@ -679,9
Hirohito Higashi wrote:
Hi, Bram
I found NFA regexp engine bug.
Prerequisite
vim 7.3.1004
set re=0
How to reproduce
vim -N -u NONE -i NONE --noplugin
oEsc
/\n*or /\_.*
Actual
gone infinite loop.
How to take back control. (on linux)
pgrep -lf
kill -9 nnn
Hi Bram,
I'd be interested in a high level overview about what can/should be done
for the release to happen.
This way people who are willing to help (eventually me) can pick a task,
document that they are working on it, and get it done.
Does it exist? If a titanpad or public google documents
Currently, I'm trying to fix \%# \%23c #%23c .
https://gist.github.com/mattn/5626661
I'll send a patch in later.
On 5/22/13, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
Hirohito Higashi wrote:
Hi, Bram
I found NFA regexp engine bug.
Prerequisite
vim 7.3.1004
set re=0
How to reproduce
One more. \ze does not work.
On 5/21/13, Ken Takata ken...@csc.jp wrote:
Hi,
2013/05/21 Tue 9:16:55 UTC+9 mattn wrote:
* Some plugins doesn't work
* \%u is disabled
* test64 contains tests for multi-byte
* test95 doesn't pass without enc=utf-8
* Strange condition in the line 1094:
if
Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
* Some plugins doesn't work
Can you please come up with reproducible examples?
* \%u is disabled
You mean it does not work:
echo matchlist('yes no', '\%#=1\%u0020')
echo matchlist('yes no', '\%#=2\%u0020')
However, this does work:
echo matchlist('yes
Ken Takata wrote:
2013/05/21 Tue 9:16:55 UTC+9 mattn wrote:
* Some plugins doesn't work
* \%u is disabled
* test64 contains tests for multi-byte
* test95 doesn't pass without enc=utf-8
* Strange condition in the line 1094:
if (*regparse == 'n' || *regparse == 'n')
Yeah, that's
Hi Bram!
On Di, 21 Mai 2013, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Ken Takata wrote:
2013/05/21 Tue 9:16:55 UTC+9 mattn wrote:
* Some plugins doesn't work
* \%u is disabled
* test64 contains tests for multi-byte
* test95 doesn't pass without enc=utf-8
* Strange condition in the line
Hi all,
I apologise if this has already been covered elsewhere, but there
is so much going on with the new regexp engine that I'm finding it
difficult to keep up.
I have all patches for 7.3 from 1 to 1000. Setting regexpengine to
2 in my
Hi John!
On Mi, 22 Mai 2013, John Marriott wrote:
Hi all,
I apologise if this has already been covered elsewhere, but there is so much
going on with the new regexp engine that I'm finding it difficult to keep up.
I have all patches for 7.3 from 1 to 1000. Setting regexpengine to 2 in my
On May 21, 2013 4:06 PM, John Marriott basil...@internode.on.net wrote:
I have all patches for 7.3 from 1 to 1000. Setting regexpengine to 2 in
my .vimrc
[...]
Of course this doesn't happen when regexpengine is 1.
As I understand it, the default setting is 0 for a reason. The new engine
isn't
John Marriott wrote:
html
head
meta content=text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
http-equiv=Content-Type
/head
Can you please send text messages?
As mentioned, don't set 'regexpengine' to 2 except for testing.
--
THEOREM: VI is perfect.
PROOF: VI in roman numerals is 6. The
On Di, 21 Mai 2013, Christian Brabandt wrote:
And also not supported yet are \_[...]
collections.
BTW: This patch enables the \_[...] collections.
diff --git a/src/regexp_nfa.c b/src/regexp_nfa.c
--- a/src/regexp_nfa.c
+++ b/src/regexp_nfa.c
@@ -679,9 +679,7 @@
/* \_[ is
Hi,
2013/05/21 Tue 9:16:55 UTC+9 mattn wrote:
* Some plugins doesn't work
* \%u is disabled
* test64 contains tests for multi-byte
* test95 doesn't pass without enc=utf-8
* Strange condition in the line 1094:
if (*regparse == 'n' || *regparse == 'n')
\%u seems to be disabled because of
23 matches
Mail list logo
