easier for you to send their way.
Just my two cents no one asked for and no one is obligated to live by.
Robin
From: Kay Malmquist
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:33 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: a tap tapt see rant
I need to write this to the people at Tap Tap See, but right now I
Sieghard
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Cara Quinn
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 7:01 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: a tap tapt see rant
Hi Sieghard,
Let me just say that the ability to send text, since the app is already
sending an i
I know the feeling, I have wasted about nine or 10 pictures on them telling me
that I am taking a picture of a black container, and then they say it is a
white strip of paper or a sticker and then they tell me that it says Dinner
Dude, and then after a few more pictures I finally get the name of
oups.com
> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 12:33 AM
> Subject: RE: a tap tapt see rant
>
> Hi Kay,
>
> With all respect, you just said you had to resort to Camfind to get the job
> done so that means you were able to get the job done with Camfind, a free
> app, so why
wait another 4 or 6 months, if it's not there then maybe it's OK to
complain.
Regards,
Sieghard
From: viphone@googlegroups.com[mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
OfJerry Mader
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 8:26 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: a tap tapt see
Hi Sandy,
I have never used Texj Grabber in a moving vehicle. I'll have to store that in
my tips bag for the future. Thanks for the tip on using Facetime. I have never
used it, so I'll have to read up on what is involved. I do have plenty of
family and friends that have iPhones. Also, MBraille
o:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Sieghard Weitzel
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 12:34 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: a tap tapt see rant
Hi Kay,
With all respect, you just said you had to resort to Camfind to get the job
done so that means you were able to get the job don
Eileen,
I am afraid I am one of the few people on this list who has never really liked
TapTapSee. When it was free it was at worst a dubious tool for me, but with the
advent of the credit system I just deleted it from my phone. The tools I tend
to use for various types of identification are: tex
ve no problem
> paying and that is not the issue here.
> Kay
> - Original Message -
> From: Sieghard Weitzel
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 12:33 AM
> Subject: RE: a tap tapt see rant
>
> Hi Kay,
>
> With all respect, y
now it
does not work as well as it once did. as I said before, I have no problem
paying and that is not the issue here.
Kay
- Original Message -
From: Sieghard Weitzel
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 12:33 AM
Subject: RE: a tap tapt see rant
Hi
: Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: a tap tapt see rant
Hi,
I really value your post. I have been one of those who have been out on
the fence and not purchase a 100 picture package, nor have I updated
TaTapSee, which sits in my app store. Do you have Talking Goggles? I know
I use OCR on a daily basis to very good effect. I do not use TapTapSee because
I cannot ask a question with my image. That said, I fully understand why the
developers charge as they do. It costs significant amounts of money to process
the images.
David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
Email: dchitten...@
I think that in at least some cases, the user may be expecting results that the
app was not meant to provide. If you want text read to you, why not use an OCR
app?
Andy
From: Jerry Mader
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 8:26 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: a tap tapt see rant
to
complain.
Regards,
Sieghard
From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Jerry Mader
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 8:26 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: a tap tapt see rant
Yes, I agree, I as well have stopped buying credit for
@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Kay Malmquist
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 8:16 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: a tap tapt see rant
Yes, but the ability to ask questions has already been put to the fine people
at TTS and still nothing as of yet. That is
AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: a tap tapt see rant
Hi,
I really value your post. I have been one of those who have been out on the
fence and not purchase a 100 picture package, nor have I updated TaTapSee,
which sits in my app store. Do you have Talking Goggles? I know it's n
ve to resort to
CamFind to get the job done any more and nothing has changed I might add.
- Original Message -
*From:*Robin Frost <mailto:robinn...@gmail.com>
*To:*viphone@googlegroups.com <mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com>
*Sent:*Saturday, February 01, 2014 9:44
Hi David,
You have a point, but I wondering if Sandy (Queen of OCR) uses TapTapSee
current version and is having problems with it. I feel like I am fairly
skillful using OCR apps and before the update to tapTapSee that their were
numerous times that I needed to retake a picture because of it n
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 9:44 PM
> Subject: Re: a tap tapt see rant
>
> Hi,
> I write the following in humility and with the utmost respect. While I too
> have always been a proponent of an ask a specific question feature and think
> it c
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: a tap tapt see rant
Yes, but the ability to ask questions has already been put to the fine people
at TTS and still nothing as of yet. That is not to say it isn't being worked
on. I don't care how small or stupid to some people a fortune is, not
everybod
ed I might add.
- Original Message -
From: Robin Frost
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: a tap tapt see rant
Hi,
I write the following in humility and with the utmost respect. While I
too have always been a proponent o
good pixal count. Atleast they
could tell you that though.
Billy Maynard
- Original Message -
From: David Chittenden
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:00 PM
Subject: Re: a tap tapt see rant
Each time you take a picture of a paper with text
I think in short what he is saying is that nothing would replace a working set
of eyes lol. from Mich.
- Original Message -
From: David Chittenden
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: a tap tapt see rant
Each time you take a
Each time you take a picture of a paper with text on it does not guarantee the
text will be recognisable, even by a human. Start working with an OCR app to
develop an understanding what I am talking about.
David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
Sent fr
Robin
>
> From: Kay Malmquist
> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:33 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: a tap tapt see rant
>
> I need to write this to the people at Tap Tap See, but right now I am
> anything but constructive. For some odd reason I love to know
@googlegroups.com
Subject: a tap tapt see rant
I need to write this to the people at Tap Tap See, but right now I am anything
but constructive. For some odd reason I love to know what my fortune cookie
says. So I started tap tap see and took a picture. first come back was,
"fortune cookie
Yes, I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill. You're wasting
pictures on something as small as a fortune cookie paper? I don't think you can
expect a reading in one or two pictures.
Kyle
> On Feb 1, 2014, at 10:33 PM, "Kay Malmquist" wrote:
>
> I need to write this to the people at
I need to write this to the people at Tap Tap See, but right now I am
anything but constructive. For some odd reason I love to know what my
fortune cookie says. So I started tap tap see and took a picture. first
come back was, "fortune cookie paper". Brilliant deduction Sherlock. I am
bli
re should be a short edit box or
>>> something to allow me, as the user, to convey the information that I
>>> need.
>>> a blind user may still have to take a couple pictures to receive the
>>> correct information. However, it is also possible to cut down on the
>
eing sought. I think this is a reasonable request. Until
>> that happens, I am using camFind with great success. I used it today in
>> fact to verify that the box I had was the maple flavoring which I needed
>> for my recipe.
>> Kellie, guide Loki and retired July
>>
>
til that happens, I am using camFind
> with great success. I used it today in fact to verify that the box I had was
> the maple flavoring which I needed for my recipe.
> Kellie, guide Loki and retired July
>
>
>
> From: David Chittenden
> Sent: Saturday, November
take a couple pictures to receive the
>>> correct information. However, it is also possible to cut down on the
>>> number of pictures because the sighted person on the other end knows what
>>> information is being sought. I think this is a reasonable request. Until
>>&g
down on the
>> number of pictures because the sighted person on the other end knows what
>> information is being sought. I think this is a reasonable request. Until
>> that happens, I am using camFind with great success. I used it today in
>> fact to verify that the box
this is a reasonable request. Until that happens, I am using camFind
> with great success. I used it today in fact to verify that the box I had was
> the maple flavoring which I needed for my recipe.
> Kellie, guide Loki and retired July
>
>
>
> From: David Chittenden
>
for my recipe.
Kellie, guide Loki and retired July
From: David Chittenden
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 11:40 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: tap tapt see
Okay, try a different app and get less effective results. But at least, you are
not paying for the service. The fact is
Okay, try a different app and get less effective results. But at least, you are
not paying for the service. The fact is, they can only tell you what they can
make out. If you need more pictures, by the unlimited package.
David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
Mobile: +64 21 22
Well you have the option to purchase unlimited pictures for $9.99 a month.
Unless you can see the iPhone screen, maybe it took you taking 3 pictures
before the writing on that very tiny piece of paper was in focus enough to have
the desired result returned.
I know after a failed picture or 2,
I hate to bring this up again, but here is why I have a problem with $8 for
100 pictures. I just had a Chinese dinner and with that dinner of course
came a fortune cookie. I always like to know what my fortune says so I
opened Tap Tap See. The first picture said "white printed paper". No
ki
38 matches
Mail list logo
