It sounds like the troublesome PC has XP firewall enabled (although it
doesn't explain the unable to resolve host error).
.
Elminster wrote:
Hi,
After looking through the FAQs and searching the mailing list, I have
encountereda puzzling problem.
I have installed RealVNC on all of my Computers
Zhang Wei,
It sounds like you're using a VNC Free Edition viewer to try to connect to a
VNC Enterprise Edition server that is configured with encryption always on.
VNC Free Edition viewers don't support encrypted sessions.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Of Paul Kaplan
Sent: 12 April 2007 03:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: vnc connection to restricted XP accounts
I guess my question about workaround was related to running
VNC as a service
not a program. Can one workaround the Fast User Switching
problem w/ VNC
running as a service
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: vnc connection to restricted XP accounts
It is started a system service. What happens is that when I
attempt to login
to a restricted user account, the connection is dropped.
Paul
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 3:57:38 pm Mick wrote
. it's
not specific to Limited accounts at all?
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Kaplan
Sent: 10 April 2007 23:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: vnc connection
: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: vnc connection to restricted XP accounts
It is started a system service. What happens is that when I
attempt to login
to a restricted user account, the connection is dropped.
Paul
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 3:57:38 pm Mick wrote
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: vnc connection to restricted XP accounts
I'll have to check. If this is the case, is there a work
around? Is the
problem unique to RealVNC or do other VNC servers have the
same problem?
Paul
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 6:05:38 am James
Paul Kaplan wrote:
I have realvnc running as a service on XP SP2, and it works fine as long as I
try to connect to user accounts that have administrative privileges. When I
try to access restricted accounts, my remote connection gets terminated.
This is true whether I connect directly or
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 12:28, Paul Kaplan wrote:
I have realvnc running as a service on XP SP2, and it works fine as long as
I try to connect to user accounts that have administrative privileges.
When I try to access restricted accounts, my remote connection gets
terminated. This is true
It is started a system service. What happens is that when I attempt to login
to a restricted user account, the connection is dropped.
Paul
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 3:57:38 pm Mick wrote:
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 12:28, Paul Kaplan wrote:
I have realvnc running as a service on XP SP2, and
Here's the final solution to my VNC over SSH Problem (I use this to support my
Father since he is just beginning to use a computer)
On remote machine enter this command:
ssh -l username -R:5900:localhost:5900:address.no-ip.com
note: address.no-ip.com is my ip address assigned to a dynamic DNS
On Sunday 05 November 2006 01:22, GB wrote:
I'm looking for assistance in diagnosing a problem with establishing a
VNC connection. The following is how I'm going about it:
1. Initiate SSH Tunnel- From the vncviewer machine, I establish a ssh
tunnel connection with the following command in a
GB wrote:
[snip]
1. Initiate SSH Tunnel- From the vncviewer machine, I establish a ssh
tunnel connection with the following command in a terminal window:
ssh 192.168.1.107 -l user_name -p 22 -L 5900:192.168.1.107:5900
[snip]
Here is where to problem occurs- I setup a dyndns entry with
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 October 2006 10:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: VNC connection breaks down after a while
Well, my fault, here we are:
Read: connection aborted (10053)
F
--
This message was sent on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
You don't seem to have included the message that you're getting when you get
disconnected.
Cheers,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 October 2006 10:20
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Yeo, Siow-Long wrote:
Hi Stewart,
I click options on the VNC authentication page but can't find Prompt
local user to accept connections.
By the way, I am using VNC version 3.7.7.
It seems that VNC server is not running once the Win2k PC is logged out.
Regards,
SL
Then the first thing
.
-Original Message-
From: Yeo, Siow-Long [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 May 2006 06:54
To: James Weatherall
Subject: RE: VNC connection problem
Hi James,
I have installed VNC Server in service-mode but still can't
connect when
the workstation is not logged on.
Could
Yeo, Siow-Long wrote:
Greetings,
I have a problem logging onto a Windows 2000 PC that has VNC installed.
I can not connect to the PC using VNC if the PC had not already logged
onto. If someone locally login to the Windows 2000 PC, then VNC works
ok. I access the VNC server via internet explorer
Yeo, Siow-Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem logging onto a Windows 2000 PC that has VNC installed.
I can not connect to the PC using VNC if the PC had not already logged
onto. If someone locally login to the Windows 2000 PC, then VNC works
ok. I access the VNC server via internet
12:50
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: RE: VNC connection problem
Yeo, Siow-Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem logging onto a Windows 2000 PC that has VNC
installed.
I can not connect to the PC using VNC if the PC had not
already logged
onto. If someone locally login
Problem is resolved! My ISA Server block VNC traffic to different network
segment. So I just disable ISA client from my XP client, it works fine now.
I'll configure ISA server later
Thanks
On 12/29/05, Scott C. Best [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tao:
Heya. Sorry, I wanted to be sure: you
Tao:
Heya. Sorry, I wanted to be sure: you can or can't ping
the 10.0.0.2 server from your 192.168.50.38 XP client?
-Scott
Hello, everyone
I installed VNC in my xp machine (192.168.50.38) and Windows 2003 Server (
10.0.0.2). I also installed a Fedora linux machine as soft router (
Ben,
The response from the nettest script suggests that you are running a legacy
VNC server. The first thing to try is therefore to upgrade to the latest
release.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben
Subject: Re: VNC connection closed w/ error 10055
James,
When i run a netstat -an on the client I get 7 established
connections.
one of which is vnc:
TCP vnc_client_IP:3307 vnc_server_IP:5900 ESTABLISHED
netstat -an on the vnc server machine gives me 3
established connections
with one
Win XP firewall is not enabled. However, at your suggestion, I added the VNC
service to the firewall definition.
Still getting same behavior.
On 9/27/05, John Aldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two things:
Do you have the XP firewall enabled? If so, try disabling it. Also, have
you
tried
James,
When i run a netstat -an on the client I get 7 established connections.
one of which is vnc:
TCP vnc_client_IP:3307 vnc_server_IP:5900 ESTABLISHED
netstat -an on the vnc server machine gives me 3 established connections
with one vnc:
TCP vnc_server_IP:5900 vnc_client_IP:3307 ESTABLISHED
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Collier Hill
Sent: 29 September 2005 18:02
To: James Weatherall
Cc: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: VNC connection closed w/ error 10055
James,
When i run a netstat -an on the client I get 7 established
connections.
one of which is vnc:
TCP vnc_client_IP
Collier,
Error 10055 normally means that there are too many connections open on
either the server or viewer machine, meaning that the OS can't allocate
enough memory to manage them all. Try running netstat -an on both the
server and viewer when you see this error check how many established
Two things:
1) I don't know if maybe it's a permissions issue where VNC can't access the
font server.
2) *IS* the font server running on the Solaris box?
I'm afraid I don't know much about Solaris, so I can't say for sure, but I
think it is similar enough to linux that it's using something
_FontTransSocketINETConnect: Can't connect: errno = 146
failed to set default font path 'tcp/localhost:7100'
Fatal server error:
Have you definitely got a font server running on port 7100? Try taking
this off, unless you *need* it.
/usr/openwin/bin/xrdb: No such file or directory
Glen,
Can you upgrade to VNC 4.1.1 and check whether that exhibits the same
behaviour?
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Gunselman
Sent: 27 September 2005 14:23
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject:
, September 27, 2005 10:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VNC connection closed unexpectedly
John,
How do I determine if the font server is running?
I will dig into this.
Thanks for the idea,
Glen Gunselman
Systems Software Specialist
TCS
Emporia State University
John Aldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED
Two things:
Do you have the XP firewall enabled? If so, try disabling it. Also, have you
tried specifically allowing the VNC executeable in the firewall, even if
disabled?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Collier Hill
Sent: Tuesday, September
Good luck...
Whatever the reason, the csh does seem to solve the problem for me at
the present time.
On May 2, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Sean Kamath wrote:
The Borne shell doesn't do job control. No nohup command will
insulate against SIGTERM, it only protects against SIGHUP (hence the
name). I'm
That's strange... On my linux box, I can log out of all SSH sessions (I
don't do telnet for security reasons!) and my server stays up and running.
It almost sounds like the X session is checking to make sure the user who
started the session is still logged in and is using their defaults, but when
I first used VNC about 6 months ago accessing a remote site. There, on
Solaris 2.6, the same thing happened but the remote sysadm did
something and now it behaves as you stated when going there.
Now I am trying to install it on a local box with Solaris 2.7, and I
am getting the same initial
, April 29, 2005 12:00 PM
To: John Aldrich
Cc: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: VNC connection lost when initiating telnet session quits
I first used VNC about 6 months ago accessing a remote site. There, on
Solaris 2.6, the same thing happened but the remote sysadm did
something and now it behaves
I have a vague recollection of process leader problems with telnet (I
too use SSH, as it is the only reasonable way to go these days. ;-)).
Try this:
prompt $SHELL
prompt vncserver
prompt exit
prompt ps -ef | grep Xvnc
prompt ptree Xvnc-pid
Make sure that Xvnc has all the appropriate processes
Same thing happens when I start vncserver from the system console, and
then exit the terminal session in which I started it.
___
VNC-List mailing list
VNC-List@realvnc.com
To remove yourself from the list visit:
Tried the following after telnet into server system doing
su -root
# $SHELL
# /usr/local/bin/vncserver
New 'ultra10:1 ()' desktop is ultra10:1
Starting applications specified in //.vnc/xstartup
Log file is //.vnc/ultra10:1.log
# ps -a
PID TTY TIME CMD
1141 pts/10:00 vncconfi
1120
Hi
Same thing happens when i start the vncserver from the
ssh terminal and then log off. I find that Xvnc is
running and able to log in but the windows manager
some how is unable to start
Any suggestion
Regards
Dev
--- Dr Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Same thing happens when I
Which OS are you running? I am on Solaris 2.7, Ultra 10 Sparcstation,
running the free vncserver downloaded from the RealVNC site ( V
4.1.1).
On Apr 29, 2005, at 3:35 PM, Audsin dev wrote:
Hi
Same thing happens when i start the vncserver from the
ssh terminal and then log off. I find that Xvnc
Try preceding the command with nohup. For example, nohup vncserver :1
Then it should be unaffected when you log out.
Audsin dev wrote:
Hi
Same thing happens when i start the vncserver from the
ssh terminal and then log off. I find that Xvnc is
running and able to log in but the windows manager
I already tried that. Still have same problem when log out
occurs...apps die .
Even tried nohup inside xstartup file in front of xterm, vncconfig
lines to see if that made a difference.it did not.
In Solaris, nohup does not insulate the command from the SIGTERM
/usr/bin/nohup
Hi
Iam using Fedora Core 1 with tight vnc. When i try
nohup vncserver , it seems to work fine. That is, i
log in using ssh and start the vncserver (nohup
vncserver )in my remote comp and close the ssh. Now i
login using the windows vnc-client and now iam able to
view the gnome desktop as well as
Launching the vncserver from the csh seems to work, and the apps appear
to remain alive after the telnet session is exited.
# csh
ultra10# /usr/local/bin/vncserver
New 'ultra10:1 (root)' desktop is ultra10:1
Starting applications specified in //.vnc/xstartup
Log file is //.vnc/ultra10:1.log
@ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott C. Best
Sent: 18 April 2005 18:54
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC connection
Michael:
Heya. So what does the UI of EchoVNC report when you
Wez:
Sorry for the confusion. I just meant for him to *try*
EchoVNC, to see what its GUI responds with. The expriment is the
equivalent of telnet localhost 5900, of course.
-Scott
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, James Weatherall wrote:
Scott,
Unless I've missed a mail somewhere, Michael isn't using
,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott C. Best
Sent: 18 April 2005 18:54
To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC connection
Michael:
Heya. So what does the UI
Michael:
Heya. So what does the UI of EchoVNC report when you install
it alongside your RealVNC Server? It will try to detect your VNC server
listening on the loopback interface (127.0.0.1). If it can detect a
VNC server, you should be able to make VNC connections with it.
-Scott
PS: We
Done the port forward.
Tried disabling Norton.
Firewall is permanently off.
Still no response on 5900?
Regards
Michael Bentley
-Original Message-
From: Angelo Sarto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 April 2005 17:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC connection
Connection
PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 April 2005 23:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: vnc-list@realvnc.com
Subject: Re: VNC connection
Most likely culprit is windows xp built in firewall you need to make
an exception for vnc the application (winvnc.exe) or the prot number
TCP 5900
--Angelo
On 4/12/05, Michael Bentley
Most likely culprit is windows xp built in firewall you need to make
an exception for vnc the application (winvnc.exe) or the prot number
TCP 5900
--Angelo
On 4/12/05, Michael Bentley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was connecting to my home PC from my office when on Windows 2000 and VNC
3.3.
Greg:
Heya. Sorry for the late reply. Here's another possibility:
different Ethernet NIC's can come with different MTU sizes. Due to
the IPSEC wrapping of your packets in a VPN, an otherwise functional
MTU size can be exceeded, and packets get fragmented leading to
uncertain behavior in
failure to connect could mean that the port isn't reachable. Could you ping
your work desktop from your laptop? Make sure your VPN client is also encrypting your
wireless connection.
-Message d'origine-
De : Greg E. Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What works:
Cable
Jonathan,
look at these people - they provide an excellent way to get at systems that
connect to the net via allocated (hence dynamic) IP addresses:
http://www.no-ip.com - works for me!
I think they will answer your problem
Regards and good luck
Ceri Hankey
- Original Message -
From:
You could open the port completely, and trust VNC and a very,very,very
good password.
Or, you could configure a SSH server on your network and connect with the
tunnel (with port forwarding). It would provide encryption and another set
of passwords for connection.
The other option is to replace
-Original Message-
From: Schouten, Frits JF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a bit new in the VNC thing and need some help .
I've installed the VNC server on solaris 2.5.1.
I'm running VNC on the host which was nominated display :6
I've started an application with it's output to
Please send replies to the list.
Schouten, Frits JF said:
ps -ef is showing:
root 1462 1 0 10:30:42 ?0:47 Xvnc :6 -desktop X -auth
//.Xauthority -geometry 1024x768 -depth 8 -rfbwait 120
You have no -httpd option at all.
The vnc log file shows:
10/10/03 15:26:59 TridiaVNC
Schouten, Frits JF said:
[snip]
But I don't want to go around to every PC that need's a view and install
the
vncviewer, so I tried to connect using a browser.
When I type in http://myhost:5906 in my browser it returns 'RFB 003.003'
and nothing else.
What am I missing here? Anybody have any
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 10 October 2003 12:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VNC connection via browser not working.
Schouten, Frits JF said:
[snip]
But I don't want to go around to every PC that need's a view and install
the
vncviewer, so I tried to connect using a browser.
When
Schouten, Frits JF said:
Thanks for the reply William.
I've tried to connect to http://myhost:5806 and after about a minute I get
an error message about Cannot find server.
To avoid issues with the DNS I've also used the URL in the connection to
the
host like
http://123.456.789.0:5806 with
Hello, Mauricio.
I suppose the vncserver on your home win98 runs on the default port.
You should login with the f-secure client from win98_work to the linux and
forward local port 5901 to win98:5900 and local port 5801 to win98:5800. I
do not have f-secure here, but in the Unix ssh jargoon this
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:vnc-list-admin;realvnc.com] On Behalf Of Fernando Orjuela
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 2:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VNC Connection to Server Problem
To All:
We have installed the latest version of RealVNC as I
: William Hooper [mailto:whooper;freeshell.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VNC Connection to Server Problem
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:vnc-list-admin;realvnc.com] On Behalf Of Fernando Orjuela
Sent: Wednesday, October
65 matches
Mail list logo
