On 6 Jul 2014 07:12, John Phillips john.philli...@gmail.com wrote:
They do really offer that service as long as you send them a complete
meter... No missing parts. Well they will take a few missing screws and
such.
There is also the possibility someone has tried repairing it, but done so
On 18 Dec 2014 19:06, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
In message 5492f59e.8060...@free.fr, Joel Setton writes:
In my search for the Perfect Volt, I'm thinking about building a
reference voltage generator which would average the voltages generated
If you want to do it
On 19 Dec 2014 19:30, Jan Fredriksson j...@41hz.com wrote:
It's no coincidence that virtually all 8.5 digit DMMs use the LTZ1000.
It's in a class of it's own.
What do the 8.5 digit meters use if they don't use the LTZ1000?
Dave.
___
volt-nuts
On 20 Dec 2014 21:18, Joel Setton set...@free.fr wrote:
Jan,
Thanks for a good summary f the pros/cons. Of course the LTZ1000 is much
closer to the current state of the art, but the REF102 is far easier to use
and to calibrate. I'm definitely not shooting for sub-ppm performance, if I
can
I have bought an HP 4284A precision LCR meter. This is an old model with a
basic accuracy of 0.05% and covers 20 Hz to 1 MHz.
Converting the specifications into determining the uncertainty of a
measurement is nontrivial, but I think it reasonable to assume the
uncertainty will always be 0.05%.
On 27 January 2015 at 09:16, Orin Eman orin.e...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a seller letting a slow trickle of them out there... they seem to
be going for about $165. The current batch of two is around $100, but will
probably be bid up.
I just received one that I won. Seems to be working
On 28 January 2015 at 18:56, Charles Steinmetz csteinm...@yandex.com wrote:
The problem is that an LTZ1000 (or LM399) runs hot enough that most plastics
you find lying around won't stand up to it for very long (some of them melt
almost immediately when you power it up). This is true even of
On 5 Jan 2015 15:36, Randy Evans randyevans2...@gmail.com wrote:
This is indirectly pertinent to the group since I am designing a PCB for
the HP-419A and Fluke 845A modifications. Does anyone have any
experience/comments on the Design Spark PCB design package? Is is a
viable
package for
On 27 Jan 2015 09:47, Orin Eman orin.e...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a seller letting a slow trickle of them out there... they seem to
be going for about $165. The current batch of two is around $100, but
will
probably be bid up.
I am puzzled why there are so many reference boards that are
On 30 January 2015 at 12:25, Will willvo...@gmail.com wrote:
The boards are factory rejects.
I doubt all boards on eBay are in this category. Some are probably
quite genuine, some may be rejects, and it would never surprise me if
some are counterfeit. The problem is, I have no idea what ones are
This might interest those with an interest in metrology in the UK. It
is run by Keysight on the 16th and 18th June
http://www.keysight.com/main/eventDetail.jspx?cc=USlc=engckey=2553856nid=-33166.920244.08id=2553856cmpid=1-6830540895
The annoying this is Keysight are running something else that
Google that and you should find a seminar sponsored by Keysight,
scheduled for Tuesday, April 14, 2015 1:00pm ET / 10:00am PT (I'll
convert to GMT later)
Trouble is, it is streamed in a Windows format.
Dr. David Kirkby Ph.D CEng MIET
Kirkby Microwave Ltd
Registered office: Stokes Hall Lodge,
I have bought some resistors of 0.1, 1.0, 10, 100, 1k, 10k 100k Ohms.
These are in little boxes with 4 BNC connectors spaced 22 mm apart.
This sort of thing
http://m.ebay.co.uk/itm/231460477406
although I paid a *lot* less.
They are designed for use verifying the performance of LCR meters. I
I was looking to make some inductors that I can use as a sanity check for
my HP 4284A LCR meter. I don't too much care what their values are, but I
want them to be stable with time. Any suggestions about the best way to
make or buy them? I'd like values in the range of 1 nH to 100 mH.
The LCR
On 20 August 2015 at 02:38, Todd Micallef tmical...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a DIY guide to making some lab standards. It is detailed with some
component values.
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/4848/1/JSIR%2065%286%29%20510-513.pdf
If this was April the first, I would be
> external influences as possible. Of course, the same couild be said of
> any
> > physical or electrical standard.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave M
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
> >
> >> I was look
I just sent an email by mistake, failing to finish it before hitting
"send".
The recent discussion about creating inductor standards from a capacitor
and two resistors got me thinking. I suspect if you connected up an HP (or
similar) LCR meter in a way not intended, you could make it appear you
On 13 Sep 2015 09:15, "M K" wrote:
> There has been some of those references available second hand from ebay,
mostly pulled, but some may be counterfeit, so look for sellers with
pictures showing it as old..
Several sellers have more than 1, but with one photo, so you would
On 25 Nov 2015 11:18, "Charles Steinmetz" wrote:
>
> I'm curious why you think the AD587/586 are better than other
hermetically packaged references with better drift and noise specifications
-- in particular,
>
> MAX6350MJA
> AD588KQ
> LTC6655CHLS8
> LTC6655BHLS8
>
On 29 November 2015 at 10:53, Charles Steinmetz
wrote:
Dave wrote:
>
> As regards humidity, I wonder if an reasonable attempt at sealing a package
>> combined with silica gel inside would give an internal humidity that keeps
>> fairly stable.
>>
>
> That is exactly what I
On 4 Jun 2016 20:44, "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
>
>
> In message <57527f8a.6070...@yandex.com>, Charles Steinmetz writes:
>
> >As I have mentioned before, for many years I have put precision circuits
> >that may be sensitive to humidity into gasketed metal boxes with
On 26 June 2016 at 20:46, Todd Micallef wrote:
> David,
>
> I have found that many sellers like to remove any calibration stickers or
> tamper evident stickers. Not sure why they do that as a sticker does not
> mean the item is calibrated.
>
The sticker on the front has
On 26 June 2016 at 15:12, Andrea Baldoni wrote:
> Hello All.
>
> I measured the thermal EMF of two common solder, the lead free
> Sn96.5/Ag3/Cu0.5 and the old Sn60/Pb40.
>
Please excuse my ignorance, but how do you mean the thermal EMF of solder?
Do you not need another
I got the 2001 that I ordered yesterday. There are a few things that make
me feel uneasy about it, so I will probably return it.
The calibration seal is missing off the front, which is obvious from the
eBay photo, but also one at the bottom which looks as though one needs to
open in order to get
On 25 January 2016 at 11:12, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) <
drkir...@kirkbymicrowave.co.uk> wrote:
> As noted in another thread, I want to replace a battery in a 3457A that
> has not been replaced in at least 11 years. The instrument has not been
> calibrated in t
As noted in another thread, I want to replace a battery in a 3457A that has
not been replaced in at least 11 years. The instrument has not been
calibrated in that time either. At the time it was purchased from a dealer,
I was told it was within specification, but if I wanted it calibrated I
would
On 25 January 2016 at 15:23, Andrea Baldoni <erm191...@ermione.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 07:54:34PM +0000, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby
> Microwave Ltd) wrote:
>
> > I've got a HP 3457A 6.5 digit multimeter - S/N 2703A04579. It's working
> > fine, but
On 25 January 2016 at 15:40, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message <
> canx10halwjxt+8ev8lywdqy9eez+anawihgqeyrzntsy80v...@mail.gmail.com>
> , "Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)" writes:
>
> >I'm wondering if I wou
On 25 Jan 2016 03:51, "Tom Miller" wrote:
>
> Looking through the service manual I don't see a connection from the
battery to the NVRAM. I am sure I measured battery voltage on pin28 so I
suspect a schematic error. Can someone that has one open verify that? My
3457 is in
I decided to try a little experiment on my 3457A, When on mains the SRAM
gets 4.8 ~ 5 V. This does not seem to be well regulated, so I assume
depends on mains voltage. Once power is removed, the voltage on the SRAM
stays well above the battery voltage for some considerable time, which I
assume is
On 25 January 2016 at 11:50, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message <
> canx10hcamahhhxqiao9bdzu03c2bbt787mr10rmnywk3oa8...@mail.gmail.com>
> , "Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)" writes:
>
> >ESD and leakage
On 24 January 2016 at 21:24, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message <
> canx10hadbw1u9ejc8_zgsk94k8az8vzg4ose+xngfwrali0...@mail.gmail.com>
> , "Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)" writes:
>
> >Opening the mete
On 24 January 2016 at 22:16, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message <
> canx10hcknsnxczjx8gccd2-t0j-jom7ybmncgdvis9ic3yv...@mail.gmail.com>
> , "Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)" writes:
>
> >The SRAM actually
I've got a HP 3457A 6.5 digit multimeter - S/N 2703A04579. It's working
fine, but I'm aware the battery must be at least 11 years old, as I first
bought the meter 11 years ago. I suspect its due for a change. I'm trying
to find a *reputable* source for a replacement. I want to avoid eBay, due
to
On 24 January 2016 at 22:46, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message
On 8 Apr 2016 04:21, "Joseph Gray" wrote:
>
> In February, I sent my HP 3457A in for cal. In late March, I sent my
> EDC VS330 DC Voltage Reference in for cal. Today, I just got the VS330
> back and thought I'd compare the two instruments.
Did you send them to the manufacturers
I have an HP 6674A power supply with option J06, which means that the PSU
is 70 V @ 30 A rather than the standard 60 V @ 35 A .
I've replaced a couple of bits in this and will need to replace some more,
so it would be prudent to get this calibrated.
The service manual calls for a 8.5 digit
On 18 Jul 2016 17:34, "John Phillips" wrote:
>
> Most labs never turn 3458As off. The longer they are on the lower the
drift
> rate. I would rather have an 20 year old meter with new batteries than a
> new meter.
If one buys a used meter, one has no idea if it has been
Today I went to Keysight in Winnersh in the UK for a seminar on RF material
measurements.
We were given the opportunity to go for a 20 minute tour of the repair and
calibration labs. Needless to say I took up the opportunity.
There are 3 areas at Keysight in the UK.
* Repair
* Main calibration
The 3458A page on the Keysight website is interesting.
"Notice for European Union Customers: This product is not updated to EU
RoHS compliance and can be ordered via Keysight directly or Keysight
Authorized Distributors until 31 December 2016. Beyond this date, the
product can still be purchased
On 29 October 2016 at 14:51, NeonJohn <j...@neon-john.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/28/2016 08:39 PM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
>
> > I wonder how practical it is to weld test leads, so there's no solder or
> > thermal EMF.
> >
> > I kno
The question about the Josephson Junction Array got me thinking. I wonder
if there are any sort of technologies that can produce a voltage with much
better stability than the LTZ1000, but without the cost of a Josephson
Junction Array. A sort of half-way house.
BTW, I see some rather battered up
On 19 October 2016 at 20:15, Ken Peek wrote:
> Well, I already have a 3458A,
OK, quite an expensive multimeter. Otuside my budget for something I don't
really need, but would like!
$400K is *WAY* out of my budget. I was looking more for
> something on the
On 20 October 2016 at 00:08, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
>
> In message g...@mail.gmail.com>
> , "Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)" writes:
>
> >The question about the Josephson Junction Array got me thinking. I wonder
>
On 13 November 2016 at 14:17, Chuck Harris wrote:
> RoHS does not apply to test equipment.
>
Where do you get that from? When I was looking briefly the other day, there
did not seem to be a lot of exemptions.
I'm sure Keysight must be a bit more on the ball than to put that
On 28 Oct 2016 15:25, "Juris L" wrote:
>
> Found reference to optimal emf solder composition cadmium/tin alloy
> (70 %/30 %) in JJ array measurement article page 12.
I wonder how practical it is to weld test leads, so there's no solder or
thermal EMF.
I know that this will
On 12 Oct 2016 10:31, "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
>
>
> In message <120112818.2234439.1476263954...@mail.yahoo.com>, Bruce
Griffiths wr
> ites:
>
> >Does anybody know if a 34401A can be adjusted by a competent 3rd party
lab,
> >or are the details of how to adjust the
I have a 'friend" (actually a person who I have never met, but is a pain in
the ***).
He sold a Agilent 34401A multimeter which the customer said is out of
specification and can not be adjusted.
Quickly scanning the measurent results, the meter is not showing results
with any huge errors (say
On 14 Dec 2016 14:14, "Dan Kemppainen" wrote:
> If it's a one off board, with a handful of components anything should
work. You can always redraw it later in something else. If you have 500
components, differential signals, and controlled impedance stuff that's a
different
IIRC, there are reports of 3458A's being sent to Agilent, and having a
sticker to say the "new" standard volt was used - I assume the last time
the volt was redefined.
I was chatting to someone from my radio club in the pub last night, and
somehow we got onto the definition of a volt. I'd like to
On 18 September 2017 at 18:36, Todd Micallef wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Another meter is the Cambridge LOM-510A. I am not sure if it is in your
> budget but there has been a review made on EEVBlog. There is one currently
> on eBay with a current amplifier that I have never seen
On 18 September 2017 at 23:28, george wrote:
> The reason that DC is used commercially to measure resistance is simple,
> if you use AC you may well get the reactive component as well as the
> resistance coming into play.
>
That may not be an an issue with a dual-phase
I've got two different, but not totally unrelated questions.
1) Does anyone know what is the power consumption of the 3458A reference
board? I was thinking of getting one, boxing it up with a battery, that
allowed it to keep running without mains power. I would like to know the
energy storage the
I want to measure the resistance between two bits of aluminum. Each are 40
x 30 mm across. One is 250 mm long, the other is 8 mm long. I'm wondering
is surface oxides are on the faces, so despite being held together with
bolts, the resistance is perhaps not as long as I would expect. There's
also
On 17 September 2017 at 20:12, wrote:
> The question is what accuracy you need.
>
No a lot. I just want to find out if there's any voltage drops that are
significantly higher than I would expect. The unit makes an RF transmission
line, and the loss at RF is significantly higher
On 17 September 2017 at 21:58, Mitch Van Ochten <
mi...@vincentelectronics.com> wrote:
> The Keithley 2002 uses DC but automatically takes a reading of any offset
> voltage and subtracts it (offset compensation). Rated accuracy on the 20
> ohm range (2 years) is +/- 26 ppm, and with 10 averages
On 23 September 2017 at 18:03, Tom Knox wrote:
> If you want I will send you a few to play with for a few months.
>
Thank you very much. I'd like to have a play. I sent you a private email.
Someone suggested using the DCV:DCV ratio mode to look at two references,
but I
I've been offered a Solartron 7081 8.5 digit meter, but are having
difficulty finding out much about this. Is there any "official" place where
these can be calibrated? As far as I can see from a search of Companies
House
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/02858371
Solartron Instruments
58 matches
Mail list logo