On 20 August 2015 at 02:38, Todd Micallef wrote:
> Here is a DIY guide to making some lab standards. It is detailed with some
> component values.
>
>
> http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/4848/1/JSIR%2065%286%29%20510-513.pdf
>
As I wrote before, I think this is of dubious use, as yo
Sorry about the previous double-posting - had email problems.
There is another option that occurred to me last night, to get an
equivalent inductor from an accurate reference capacitor by using an
active circuit gyrator. The problem of course is that the circuit will
add errors too, diminishin
Haha, so it is legit - just a poorly described knock-off of the H-P
unit. I had never heard of this unit, but it looks like good info to
have, to replicate some equivalent reference inductors. Thanks for
finding this document.
Ed
___
volt-nuts mailin
Haha, so it is legit - just a poorly decribed knock-off of the H-P unit.
I had never heard of this unit, but it looks like good info to have, to
replicate some equivalent reference inductors. Thanks for finding this
document.
Ed
___
volt-nuts mailing
Nothing new. That is actually a direct copy of a HP 16074A 4-terminal
quasi inductance standard. Even the pictures of the article were
copied directly from the HP manual.
2015-08-20 11.50 UTC+03.00, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
:
> If this was April the first, I would be convinced that
Found the HP manual as suggested by Will: it is now clear where the
capacitor is connected. On page 1 of the manual changes (page 3 of the
PDF file) there is a very clear drawing of the quasi-inductance
standard. The "C" port has no guard connections and is used to test
the capacitor alone.
Nothing new. That is actually a direct copy of a HP 16074A 4-terminal
quasi inductance standard. Even the pictures of the article were
copied directly from the HP manual.
> 2015-08-20 11.50 UTC+03.00, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
> :
>
>> If this was April the first, I would be convince
t seems to work in
> principle and would be worth building the real ones with shielded case.
> Again, calibrating these meters does not require inductors, still it is a
> pretty interesting approach i think.
>
>
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 um 03:38 Uhr
>> Von: &
shielded case.
Again, calibrating these meters does not require inductors, still it is a
pretty interesting approach i think.
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 um 03:38 Uhr
> Von: "Todd Micallef"
> An: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement"
> Betreff:
On 20 August 2015 at 02:38, Todd Micallef wrote:
> Here is a DIY guide to making some lab standards. It is detailed with some
> component values.
>
>
> http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/4848/1/JSIR%2065%286%29%20510-513.pdf
>
OK, I tried this.
I was hoping to use a box I had with
On 20 August 2015 at 19:11, Brooke Clarke wrote:
> Hi Dave:
>
> I'd classify this article more like pseudoscience than April's fool. To
> get an idea of the quality of the paper just check out the publisher.
>
Yes, the publisher does seem dubious. If Wikipedia is to be believed, they
were willi
Hi Dave:
I'd classify this article more like pseudoscience than April's fool. To get an idea of the quality of the paper just
check out the publisher.
"The Chinese Publisher SCIRP (Scientific Research Publishing): A Publishing Empire Built on Junk Science" what I found
by searching for the p
The method described in the document would not make an actual inductor -
it apparently fools the 4-port machine by providing the equivalent
signals that the inductance would have. You can avoid getting precision
inductors, and just go with this method (which I think is pretty clever
if it actua
On 20 August 2015 at 02:38, Todd Micallef wrote:
> Here is a DIY guide to making some lab standards. It is detailed with some
> component values.
>
>
> http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/4848/1/JSIR%2065%286%29%20510-513.pdf
>
>
If this was April the first, I would be convinced that
anyway.
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 um 03:38 Uhr
> Von: "Todd Micallef"
> An: "Discussion of precise voltage measurement"
> Betreff: Re: [volt-nuts] Anyone know how to make stable inductors?
>
> Here is a DIY guide to making some lab standards.
Here is a DIY guide to making some lab standards. It is detailed with some
component values.
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/4848/1/JSIR%2065%286%29%20510-513.pdf
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Dave M wrote:
> Here's a paragraph from IETLab's web site on how their inductance
>
Here's a paragraph from IETLab's web site on how their inductance standards
are made:
"Each standard inductor is a uniformly wound toroid on a ceramic core. It
has a negligible external magnetic field and hence essentially no pickup
from external fields. The inductor is resiliently supported i
It's a lot harder than making stable capacitors... particularly for low
inductance values. I think the process involves the use of rainbow flavored
unicorn tears. There are some 0.01% standard inductors on Ebay starting at
around $400 each. Also some .1% ones for a lot less. Decent L measur
I was looking to make some inductors that I can use as a sanity check for
my HP 4284A LCR meter. I don't too much care what their values are, but I
want them to be stable with time. Any suggestions about the best way to
make or buy them? I'd like values in the range of 1 nH to 100 mH.
The LCR mete
19 matches
Mail list logo