Google came through.
http://www.space-mixing-theory.com/article2.pdf
Carbon resistors generate more thermal voltage noise
than Metal film resistors. That by itself proves
nothing, but when applied to an antenna with radiation
resistance we disprove the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
Consider two experiments where the only difference is
one uses a noisier resistor as a
In an earlier thread concerning the significance of a large
external electric field to the SPAWAR experimental results,
announced in New Energy Times it was mentioned that there were a
number of possible explanations, including:
7) an alteration in time itself such that a normal QM
Deborah D. L. Chung has been on this issue for some time, the following
links may be of interest in ref. to the carbon resistor and excess energy.
The Chung's Negative Resistance experiment
Dr. Deborah D. L. Chung, professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering
at University at Buffalo (UB)
In reply to Paul's message of Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:27:11 -0800
(PST):
Hi,
[snip]
Lets simply. Neither experiment A or B have a power
source except thermal noise. Experiment B radiates
more power. It is a very simple circuit. Over time,
more energy is leaving experiment B than experiment A.
This article may have relevance to the recent SPAWAR experiment.
- Original Message -
From:
Frederick Sparber
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:16
AM
Subject: [Vo]: Re: E-Field Mass
Cancellation
Google came through.
Why have we tried to decrease the time measurement window? Look at the
first oscilloscopes, they were deemed a great advance in measurement
technology, yet they were slow, the window was broad. Technology improved
and we began to see things in waveforms that we were amazed with. The faster
the
Robin! I'm at a loss?
So you are saying that 'Carbon' has 0 {zero} background radiation? Like it
is at 0 K'
Why can not an object which radiates energy (we know all thing do) can not
be fed into an antenna, properly tuned and transmit energy?
Maybe your time is before the old carbon element
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 06:14:11PM -0800, Jones Beene wrote:
Just thinking out loud, the short list of excludable (alterable)
properties which a high external electric field might arguably
influence - include:
[1 to 6]...
7) an alteration in time itself such that a normal QM
probability
But isn't this effect more closely related to Brown-Biefeld;
or am I missing something?
M.
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
Mark
If an electric field could alter the rate of flow of time,
wouldn't it have been noticed?
With the proper instrumentation, we should get a hint - and we are
getting closer to that point where quantum changes are becomming
noticeable on advanced meters - to the extent that we don't
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: OT: Give Mel a Break?
Would all follow this law, we would be admitted into the Galactic
Federation. Until then, we are considered
In reply to Standing Bear's message of Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:31:46
-0500:
Hi,
[snip]
When does the first ship leave for Orion?
[snip]
The Phoenix has already departed. Sorry you missed the boat. ;^)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
Competition provides the
--- Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In reply to Paul's message of Mon, 13 Nov 2006
11:27:11 -0800
(PST):
Hi,
[snip]
Lets simply. Neither experiment A or B have a power
source except thermal noise. Experiment B radiates
more power. It is a very simple circuit. Over time,
more
In reply to Kyle R. Mcallister's message of Mon, 13 Nov 2006
17:43:32 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Unless the Galactic Federation (or locally most advanced interstellar
species) subscribes to Pellegrino/Zebrowski's version of the relativistic
Golden Rule:
Do unto others as they would do unto you, and do
In reply to R Stiffler's message of Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:13:45
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Robin! I'm at a loss?
So you are saying that 'Carbon' has 0 {zero} background radiation? Like it
is at 0 K'
No, what I was trying to say was that I didn't think you could
measure an electrical signal coming from a
On 11/13/06, Mark S Bilk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If an electric field could alter the rate of flow of time,
wouldn't it have been noticed? For example, two gas lasers
(e.g., the widely used CW helium-neon) would produce a beat
frequency if the voltage across their gas discharge tubes
were
Sorry - that was Big Bobby Clobber's line - the resident hockey player on
the Royal Canadian Air Farce:
Do unto others before they do unto you.
P.
At 05:43 PM 11/13/2006 -0500, you wrote:
- Original Message - From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
18 matches
Mail list logo
