Re: [Vo]:Filament ion jets

2007-06-07 Thread Michel Jullian
Hi Horace, Let's try to agree on simple things, in a simple example. Say at t=0 the HV is turned on instantly and the +ve anode's tip starts emitting a dotted line of slow-flying +ve ions which won't arrive before t=50ms. Say the flow of charge is a constant 10nA flowing out of the tip. The

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Michel Jullian
Yes good point Horace, my chemical induced ionization hypothesis doesn't explain the barrier crossing. Unless maybe some neutral H atoms manage to leak through the micron-thin barrier before combining into H2? I suppose this would be much more likely in a contact arrangement, they don't say if

[VO]:Re;OT: Light and transparent

2007-06-07 Thread R.C.Macaulay
BlankJones wrote.. The literary interpretation on this theme is sometimes rooted in the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics but it can operate in reverse by assuming that each potential outcome has already happened somewhere previously in 4-space, and we presently have the group

Re: [Vo]:Glow discharge papers from Savvatimova et al.

2007-06-07 Thread Jones Beene
Jed Rothwell wrote: I uploaded three papers by Irina Savvatimova et al. Another one is coming, after she sends me some changes. This one: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MuromtsevVneutrinodi.pdf ... on the Iwamura effect **[if it could be trusted as accurate]** is every bit the bombshell

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michel Jullian wrote: I suppose this would be much more likely in a contact arrangement, they don't say if their barrier tests were done by direct contact or with some air gap between the Pd sample and the barrier. Other papers from BARC say there was an air gap, usually or always -- I am

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:48 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Michel Jullian wrote: I suppose this would be much more likely in a contact arrangement, they don't say if their barrier tests were done by direct contact or with some air gap between the Pd sample and the barrier. Other papers from BARC

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Jones Beene
Horace Heffner wrote: That pretty much leaves production of a radioactive species that degasses from the Pd. Only if one discounts the hydrino-hydride -- auger electron displacement explanation - or the one offered by Robin. Radioactive species degassing should fog film equally well, or

Re: [Vo]:Filament ion jets

2007-06-07 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jun 7, 2007, at 4:57 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: Hi Horace, Let's try to agree on simple things, in a simple example. Say at t=0 the HV is turned on instantly and the +ve anode's tip starts emitting a dotted line of slow-flying +ve ions I'm curious - why do you use the notation +ve?

Re: [Vo]:Glow discharge papers from Savvatimova et al.

2007-06-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: ... on the Iwamura effect **[if it could be trusted as accurate]** With the caveat: **[if this paper could be trusted as accurate]** As everyone is aware, the Russians are very advanced in nuclear physics, but also, as a practical matter, the science establishment over

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Jones Beene wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: That pretty much leaves production of a radioactive species that degasses from the Pd. Only if one discounts the hydrino-hydride -- auger electron displacement explanation - or the one offered by Robin. Radioactive

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Jones Beene
Horace, It is not possible to get an exposure in a vacuum from degassing species using the same exposure time as with atmospheric pressure gas. This is not even a close call. The exposure times are way too long. The radioactive species gets immediately evacuated. Do you have a reference

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Jones Beene wrote: Horace, It is not possible to get an exposure in a vacuum from degassing species using the same exposure time as with atmospheric pressure gas. This is not even a close call. The exposure times are way too long. The radioactive species

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Horace Heffner
A thought follows about the nature of the compartment, i.e. volume, close to the film, and its importance to experimental controls. The following is a simple diffusion model of the compartment close to the film. Pd---T_in-compartment--- T_out + gas_out ^

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Jones Beene
Horace, This is a nonsensical model of the process and certainly *not* one implied by me. Well - playing devil's advocate once again, if tritium were coming off in the vacuum exhaust in well-equipped labs, it would set off a warning - but maybe they did not have any such precaution...

[Vo]:Japanese news features global warming

2007-06-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
The nightly NHK National New broadcast in Japan has often discussed global warming lately. Prime Minister Abe says that Japan should take a leading role in combatting it, and he will say that at the G 8 conference now underway. Former P.M. Koizumi gave a speech the other day along the same

Re: [Vo]:Japanese news features global warming

2007-06-07 Thread R.C.Macaulay
A piece well worth reading, factual, hard to stomach, but a keen insight into Japan Inc. Substitute corporate CEO's, Blackstone et.al. and bureaucrats for Mafioso and its resembles the USA. Richard Jed wrote.. The nightly NHK National New broadcast in Japan has often discussed global

Re: [Vo]:Japanese news features global warming

2007-06-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: It is a little difficult to decide whether you would prefer to live next to a coal-fired plant run by idiots street-hood Mafiosi dropouts, or a nuclear plant run by those same idiots. . . Street-hoods is an exaggeration, but a friend of mine with inside knowledge of the Tokai

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Michel Jullian
- Original Message - From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-L@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:48 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper Michel Jullian wrote: I suppose this would be much more likely in a contact arrangement, they don't say if their barrier tests

Re: [Vo]:Filament ion jets

2007-06-07 Thread Michel Jullian
(+ve was shorthand for positive, sorry if that was confusing, I won't use it again) To be able to compare candidate scenarii on the basis of current waveforms, we should first ascertain how currents would behave in each case, trying not to digress too much (please show mercy for my limited

Re: [Vo]:Rout ICCF3 paper

2007-06-07 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Jones Beene wrote: Horace, This is a nonsensical model of the process and certainly *not* one implied by me. Well - playing devil's advocate once again, I think my interest here is fast ending. I have a lot of mundane things I have to do before winter,

Re: [Vo]:Filament ion jets

2007-06-07 Thread Horace Heffner
On Jun 7, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Michel Jullian wrote: (+ve was shorthand for positive, sorry if that was confusing, I won't use it again) To be able to compare candidate scenarii on the basis of current waveforms, we should first ascertain how currents would behave in each case, trying not

[Vo]:Tesla Revisted

2007-06-07 Thread Michael Foster
Check this out. Scientists have discovered wireless transmission of power in the home. Don't suppose they'll give poor ol' Tesla any credit. http://tinyurl.com/3e4c6b M. ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on

RE: [Vo]:Tesla Revisted

2007-06-07 Thread Michael Foster
Oh, here's another one, where they actually mention Tesla but claim he only attempted it. I guess they don't know he used to light up his whole lab this way. This sort of thing never ceases to amaze me. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070607/ap_on_hi_te/wireless_power M