On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:58:34 -0800 Gibson Elliot Gibson Elliot wrote..
Ether is consumed by mass, that's gravity, a pretty measurable effect in my
book!
I agree with Tesla's observation but it is incomplete..you can't just eat
ether endlessly -you must also expell it.
Puthoff's atomic
On 01/28/2010 08:20 PM, froarty...@comcast.net wrote:
Stephen,
Thank you for the explanation, I wasn't aware of anything called
Lorentz ether theory existed but will be investigating it shortly. At least
I am not crazy - someone with chops came to similar conclusion and now I
can
On 01/28/2010 09:03 PM, Chris Zell wrote:
Perhaps y'all could enlighten me. I never understood the blanket
rejection of 'ether' when radiation resistance is an engineering fact.
In the design of RF antennas, there is a radiation resistance of about
328 ohms. Clearly, something out there
Hey tune in to me if you can. I hope that I do well.
snip
Frank,
I think we'll have a fascinating show this Saturday morning! The show
starts at 10am PT, 1pm ET. Bill at Achieve Radio will be giving you a call at
just before the show starts.
Bill
On 01/28/2010 07:26 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 01/28/2010 03:05 PM, froarty...@comcast.net wrote:
I have a problem with the MM experiment. They assume an aether that
moves with respect to space yet SR
uses a right triangle rule where the spatial rate is assumed
Here is my take on Mills' strategy:
Among Mills' early investors are two electric utilities, Pacific Corp. and
Atlatic City Electric (now Connective). The latter once employed Peter
Jansson as a teachnical scout for promising future investments. Jansson
recommeded BLP; his Master's thesis was
On 01/29/2010 10:19 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
That's simply not true. Read the papers I've pointed out.
Miller consistently obtained fringe shifts,
Yes, Miller was the only one who got a drift result. Nobody has
replicated his results.
A careful modern analysis of Miller's results indicates
Tune in tomorrow at 1 PM EDT. It will be on the WEB here
_http://www.achieveradio.com/vortex-progressive-tech/index.php_
(http://www.achieveradio.com/vortex-progressive-tech/index.php)
about the show
_http://www.achieveradio.com/vortex-progressive-tech/_
On 01/29/2010 10:19 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
That's simply not true. Read the papers I've pointed out.
Miller consistently obtained fringe shifts,
Yes, Miller was the only one who got a drift result. Nobody has
replicated his results.
Miller replicated M M results, with more precision.
On 01/29/2010 12:07 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
I could present a gedanken experiment (a very simple experiment indeed) to
clearly show what I mean by reality is not relative, but I'll not do
that.
Your choice. You understand what you mean, you could explain it, but
you won't.
End of
Mauro,
Well, I didn't expect that... um... thanks for the sympathetic ear in a rather
dismissive world. I'm actually touched, which I didn't expect. Been feeling a
bit jaded lately, I guess, I needed that.
I will take some time in the very near future and write up a brief summarizing
my
On 01/29/2010 12:07 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
I could present a gedanken experiment (a very simple experiment indeed)
to
clearly show what I mean by reality is not relative, but I'll not do
that.
Your choice. You understand what you mean, you could explain it, but
you won't.
I don't have
On 01/29/2010 12:35 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 01/29/2010 12:07 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
I could present a gedanken experiment (a very simple experiment indeed)
to
clearly show what I mean by reality is not relative, but I'll not do
that.
Your choice. You understand what you mean, you
On 01/29/2010 12:35 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 01/29/2010 12:07 PM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
I could present a gedanken experiment (a very simple experiment
indeed)
to
clearly show what I mean by reality is not relative, but I'll not do
that.
Your choice. You understand what you mean, you
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:19:56 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
http://www.rohnermachine.com/
http://www.pappengine.com/
[snip]
Thanks for these, I was unaware of the Rohner involvement.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
On 01/29/2010 04:53 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:19:56 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
http://www.rohnermachine.com/
http://www.pappengine.com/
[snip]
Thanks for these, I was unaware of the Rohner involvement.
Yeah, I was surprised
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:15:43 -0800 Mike Carrell said
If you want an understanding of the Papp engine, **study** the work of
Randell Mills and the evolution of Balcklight Power. The idea of anengine
running off nolble gases seems absurd, but argon, helium and water vapor can
for a catalutic
John Berry wrote:
An encyclopedia can either give a biased answer/opinion/pov/conclusion that
the reader should ignore, or give no answer/opinion/pov/conclusion
presenting all sides letting reader choose.
I do not believe it is possible for anyone to have an unbiased point of
view, or even to
It is the dimension of a BOSE condensate. A Bose condensate is a macro
atom.
The electrons are adjoined within the condensate.
The nucleons are adjoined by vibration.
A classical condition exists where the electronic velocity = the nuclear
velocity
What is exposed. The nuclear
19 matches
Mail list logo
