On 25 Sep 2011, at 05:31, Axil Axil wrote:
That is to say, neutrinos changing their flavor will go very fast (at warp
speed) for a very short period of time during flavor change then once flavor
change is complete, continue to move along indefinably at light speed.
Hi Axil,
I thought
On 23 Sep 2011, at 23:23, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:07:14
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
What are the ends of the dipole? Getting back to the above paragraph of
just what’s oscillating… and the aether being under tremendous
I hope the attached picture comes thru...
And I'd need to know more about exactly how the pic was made, but this is
most certainly in line with my 'vision' as to what is going on... but then
again, there are 100 ways to skin a cat!
-Mark
attachment: AtomicStrobe-light_01.jpg
In response to Robin's comment below...
You can find 100 people who will tell you something can't be done, for every
one that at least will try!
Scientists currently hold various physical objects (including atoms) in
place using strong electric or magnetic fields, or even light. So I think
it
Robin,
Thanks for providing various feedback...
In your response below, you state,
This happens at twice the Bohr radius, which is thus the maximum
separation distance between electron and proton. In short the chance
that the electron will be found beyond this is zero (unless it
acquires energy
Hi Dr. K,
Yes, I'm sure Dr. Mills will object...
*IF* he ever bothered to read this bunch of loomies!
Oh, and that's loomies, as in, 'Luminaries'! :-)
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Dr Josef Karthauser [mailto:j...@tao.org.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 11:01 PM
To:
Rossi timeline:
Sept. 8, 2011 Rossi meeting with fourth potential customer (investor)
Sept. 7, 2011 Rossi device test for Lewan/Ny Teknik. Device shows outflow of
steam and water.
Sept. 6, 2011 Rossi device test with third potential customer (investor). NASA
staff present. Test inconclusive;
So, Rossi pulled a Steorn on NASA!
Hello group,
This got just forwarded to me:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3742appendix37.shtml
Have a look to the September 5th and 6th entries. It looks like they
have been added yesterday. I'm pasting them here:
Sept. 8, 2011 Rossi meeting with fourth potential customer
On 2011-10-04 19:10, Mattia Rizzi wrote:
Rossi timeline:
[snip]
I should have checked the mailing list before sending my other message.
Credits to you.
Cheers,
S.A.
Quite good information from
2006:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/government/DTRA/DTRA-Report-on-LENR.shtml
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
So, Rossi pulled a Steorn on NASA!
Technical problems and delays are normal when testing a cutting-edge
prototype machine. People at NASA know that rocket launches are often delay
or scrubbed. As far as I know, Steorn has never shown any group of
Not new papers, but new to me (and probably to U2)
http://puhep1.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/current.pdf
http://gr.physics.ncsu.edu/files/babson_ajp_77_826_09.pdf
Older vorticians may remember Scott Little posting on this subject a decade
ago.
Needless to say, Scott did not foresee OU
Rossi has several devices at his disposal;
2011/10/4 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
So, Rossi pulled a Steorn on NASA!
Technical problems and delays are normal when testing a cutting-edge
prototype machine. People at NASA know that rocket
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi has several devices at his disposal;
NASA has lots of rockets too, but on a give day, only one is ready to
launch. Or not ready as it often turns out. Getting one to work is a
struggle. Every cold fusion experiment I know of is the same way.
Greetings Vortex-L.
I was wondering IF there is any link between the Hidden Momentum in the
Feynman Disc Paradox as well as the Non-Linear Propulsion Patent by
Col. Rex Schlicher,ret.
A search of the text shows no Feynman citationin the Princeton paper.
Respectfully,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
In
I am not rejecting LENR or every new technology. I am just saying that ecat
has been a very reliable device, except for those tests, when an investor
was visiting with a very reliable assistance, NASA. Rossi is low on money,
anyone in this place would make the best to put some redundancy.
As for
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not rejecting LENR or every new technology. I am just saying that ecat
has been a very reliable device, except for those tests, when an investor
was visiting with a very reliable assistance, NASA.
That is not what I have heard. I have heard
Jed wrote regarding the e-Cat:
It often leaks or plugs up.
Scuze me? I can understand the leaking, but plugging up??? How does water
flowing thru a pipe get plugged???
There must be more to the internals than just the reactor core and the
internal volume of the pipe!
Do they have a flow
The italian science magazine Focus has a short announcement:
http://www.focus.it/scienza/e-cat-focusit-al-test-del-6-ottobre-20111003_C12.aspx
Google Translation Italian-English:
Thursday, October 6 at Bologna began testing a new E-Cat: Focus.it will
be present to document the event with
Google translation:
nuclear physics - according to Smith's own statements.
Smith = Rossi.
As noted here previously.
- Jed
Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Scuze me? I can understand the leaking, but plugging up??? How does water
flowing thru a pipe get plugged???
Dunno. I guess maybe in the portion surrounding the cell. Anyway, I have
heard it gets plugged up.
It is easy to see why it
Am 04.10.2011 23:02, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Google translation:
nuclear physics - according to Smith's own statements.
Smith = Rossi.
Thanks! I asked myself who is this?
According to other news there will also be some other physics professors
of university Bologna.
Am 04.10.2011 23:05, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
mailto:zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Scuze me? I can understand the leaking, but plugging up??? How
does water flowing thru a pipe get plugged???
Dunno. I guess maybe in the portion surrounding
On 2011-10-04 23:09, Peter Heckert wrote:
According to other news there will also be some other physics professors
of university Bologna.
That article is from last May, by the way.
Cheers,
S.A.
We don't allow faster than light neutrinos in here,
says the bartender.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
Leaks, plugups, sudden heat excursions, and explosions are reasonable
outcomes when a ceramic heating resistor is raised to high
temperatures within a constricted, complex chamber with a fixed flow
of water throughput.
Much will be revealed when public autopsies are allowed on Rossi
devices that
Fwd: Pendulum physics -- 15 pendulums, longer in a line, show spurious
casuality with remarkable wave dynamics, Ernst Mach 1867, 1:45 video:
Rich Murray 2011.10.04
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Garst jega...@beyondbb.com
Date: Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:49 PM
Subject: Pendulum
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't allow faster than light neutrinos in here,
says the bartender.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
Tachey?
Hi,
:-)), good one.
MoB
Thanks, Bruce -- I notice when I make the view smaller, then I see all
balls as rotating counterclockwise, with the top violet end faster, as
a spinning spiral staircase becomes a double helix...
Rich Murray
Love it! :)
--
Dr Joe Karthauser
On 5 Oct 2011, at 00:27, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
We don't allow faster than light neutrinos in here,
says the bartender.
A neutrino walks into a bar.
Jed, this time I can't believe you're talking seriously.
Only one out of 52 properly working ?
And how in the earth they could run nicely and smoothly all 52 togheter to
demonstrate the 1 Mw big-mama-bozo by the end of this month?
They all have to be ready right now ! Even if Italy is the land of
I doubt he does. (Has he ever posted here?)
I like the play on words, although I'm not sure that we _all_ glow! (Well, not
all the time, anyway!)
:)
Joe
On 4 Oct 2011, at 08:41, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Hi Dr. K,
Yes, I'm sure Dr. Mills will object...
*IF* he ever bothered to read
34 matches
Mail list logo
