http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2012/Report5-Rossis-Profitable-Career-in-Science.shtml
New Energy Times attempts to demonstrate the profitability of the alleged
investment scheme.
//Excerpt of note:
Energy Catalyzer Patent Applications - Italian Deadline Approaches
A deadline is
Am I wrong to lump Casimir, Hall, pyrophoric and Eutectic effects as all
related by dispersion forces? There are numerous theories for the occurrence
of natural resonances inside lattices and skeletal catalysts so let me add one
more, these clusters , time crystals or other labels for
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
This is what it should look like. However I think the solution is to not
have a
frame embedded within a frame in the first place.
What you need is to have the tool bar (menu bar?) at the top, attached to
the
same frame that is displayed in
I read through all of this - and still do not understand how Rossi will get
rich without a working device.
Can anyone explain it ?
Okay, I put in links to all library indexes the make it convenient to open
them in new windows. See:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1081
I added the Library guide page showing how to do this:
http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1172
I have had it with this project. Enough already.
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I have had it with this project. Enough already.
Despite any critical comments, you have done a remarkable job, Jed.
The site is vastly improved and has a modern look.
Why not consider some simple advertising links? You
I certainly cannot explain it.Just finished reading it. Still waiting on the bit where Krivit says he will reveal "Followers of the Rossi story ask, "What is Rossi's endgame? If the
Energy Catalyzer doesn't work, how could he stand to profit?" This
analysis will answer these questions."Annoyed
Jojo, I'll try to send You an assessment of the situation from an electronics
point of view, hopefully this weekend.
RF could potentially do something good, concerning overall COP, but I doubt
that any of the current designs ever used RF.
The setup would be nontrivial, and I cannot see that in
he needs a gullible investor, or a fraudulent investor wanting to find
a bigger gullible investor,
he's probably learned the game with his previous fraudulent work
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I read through all of this - and still do not understand how
Jeff Driscoll hcarb...@gmail.com wrote:
he needs a gullible investor, or a fraudulent investor wanting to find a
bigger gullible investor, he's probably learned the game with his previous
fraudulent work
He has not learned it very well, has he? If he is a con-man, he is the most
inept con-man
Using the phrase "gullible investors" is the equivalent of the "swamp gas" excuse in UFO literature.Investors take risks, and they have the money to do so - that is the whole nature of being an investor. The anti free energy brigade try to paint investors as dear old ladies about to lose their
Why not consider some simple advertising links? You deserve to offset
your costs and I would have no trouble ignoring such advertising on
the web site. :-)
T
I agree, it will not make you rich but at least to pay the hosting costs.
If you do not like the ads, explain how to make a
I meant to say Rossi DOES NOT care about credibility.
Here is an astounding statement from Krivit:
How did highly educated professionals in the scientific community not
recognize the multiple contradictions in the Rossi story? How did they not
see the scientific failure of Rossi's claim?
Is
I'd still like to see an experiment which eliminates the possibility
of external energy entering the system (a la the thermocouple being
plugged in backwards). But alas I think this will have to wait for a
third party.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:01 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
One
In anyone's opinion (especially Jed), and in order of convincingness
for an investor that wants to invest, which should be the most
convincing Rossi tests (include the date to reduce confusion)?
Also, are there any competent scientists who have *carefully* looked
at any Defkalion tests and put
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Michele Comitini
michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, it will not make you rich but at least to pay the hosting costs.
If you do not like the ads, explain how to make a contribution to
support the site with paypal.
True. I contribute to several sites
At 04:49 PM 3/7/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
I read through all of this - and still do not understand how Rossi
will get rich without a working device.
Can anyone explain it ?
Krivit isn't totally explicit. But you get money for research and
development. Which somehow is all spent.
Rossi did
Interesting correlation. Are you using “dispersion forces” to mean the
London Dispersion Force. Too bad Grimer is not around these days - to fit
this into his different layered aether geometries…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_dispersion_force
From: Roarty, Francis X
Am I
This is not a good job by Steve. It borders on bogosity.
Yes - Rossi may manage to draw a decent salary for a few years for RD by
creating a scam - but that is NOT even close to getting rich.
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
I read through all of this - and still do not
The particles are a comin';
http://lightyears.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/07/solar-flare-heads-for-earth/?hpt=hp_c1
(Not yet the big one.)
T
I think that the total scam is not an option, however it is clear that
Rossi is overconfident, overanticipating.
It is possible and even probable that he lied more or less, even possible
he make fake demo jus to get time to
find the working recipe...
I'm afraid he is lying much, but just to get
I am kind of tired of hearing about Rossi. I would really like to hear
more about Defkalion. They waged a pretty good PR compaign with their
announcements and forum while it was operating. They published
professional looking specs. They showed some actual lab equipment and test
benches not
maybe a question of language (Rossi is more anglo-saxon introduced)
or prevalence (first on the market).
clearly for an engineer Defkalion have a more clear behavior, even when
silent.
note that my conviction of DGT is that the independent testers are so
afraid to talk alone that they ask for
23 matches
Mail list logo
