I wouldn't opt for a physically larger car just because it was cheap to run
it. I would opt for a heavier small car, though, for safety reasons.
Jeff
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Andre Blum wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 12:54 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, ChemE St
How do you get boron
Chromium(24) fissions into boron(5) and potassium(19)
Cheers: Axil
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> How do you get beryllium(4) from nickel(28)?
>
> 28 - 24 = 4... The fission of nickel into chromium and beryllium.
>
>
> How do you get lithium(3) fro
How do you get beryllium(4) from nickel(28)?
28 - 24 = 4... The fission of nickel into chromium and beryllium.
How do you get lithium(3) from copper?
29 - 3 = 26 Copper fissions into lithium and iron.
How do you get sulfur(16) from nickel(28)?
28 - 16 = 12Nickel fissions into sulfur and
10% of Rossi's ash was iron(atomic number = 26). How can you get this much
iron from nickel(atomic number = 28)?
Answer: Alpha decay of nickel (Atomic number = 2)
2 + 26 = 28 nickel - helium = iron.
Cheers: Axil
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message
Le Aug 24, 2012 à 11:46 AM, Jed Rothwell a écrit :
> That would include transmuting deuterium into tritium, by the way.
This is always a possibility, of course. But I think it would require either a
transition from D to 3He and then a very slow inverse beta decay, or,
alternatively, some kind
Good question Jojo Jaro.
Lets say there is a log on the road. In this analogy the log represents the
short range strong force. You are bind and you drive over the log. Crash!
You know you drover over the log because you heard the crash. Likewise when a
nucleon passes over the electro
Good question Jojo Jaro.
The spin orbit force is the dynamic component of the strong nuclear force. It
is the magnetic component of the strong force, however, it is not of
electromagnetic origin. The electromagnetic magnetic force is not conserved
and can increase under certain conditions.
micro black holes have a "balding phase" like I did at age 40
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Harry Veeder
> wrote:
> > encrusted protons?
>
> Hairy protons, Harry. Shaved for energy.
>
> T
>
>
In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:09:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Great, and how much of the environment did we just irradiate with high
>level gammas?
Prompt gammas are not a problem, because they can be absorbed and converted to
heat immediately. It's radioactive nuclei produc
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> encrusted protons?
Hairy protons, Harry. Shaved for energy.
T
Great, and how much of the environment did we just irradiate with high
level gammas?
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> > The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not
> consistent
> >t
It depends upon your calculation of the strength of quantum gravity and the
number of additional dimensions of spacetime it acts upon. The
blue-shifted collective radiation surrounding the surface of the collapsed
matter will be more than enough to take down a nearby coulomb barrier. A
22 microgr
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:13:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
> The Nuclear reactions that ED Storms thinks is happening is not consistent
>to what Rossi and Piantelli see as nuclear reaction products. These
>reaction products include copper, cobalt, zinc, iron, calcium, and so on
In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:22:57 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Gremlins come in different colors:
>
>Brown dwarf ~ Brown Gremlin
>White dwarf ~ White Gremiln
>Black hole ~.Black Gremlin
>Micro black hole ~ Invisible Gremlin
>
>The smaller they are the more elusive and m
encrusted protons?
;-)
harry
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Sounds like you are a fast study, JoJo.
>
> Fran Roarty has got a lot of detailed info on Casimir on his site, and there
> are lots of specialized papers on CNT online. Other than that, you may be
> breaking new gr
JoJo,
If it were simple everyone would be doing it.. some nice recent
clues I hope you were gathering were regarding the best alloys being of Ni and
cu where grain size would also be an important variable and I think you will
also need a support structure- dielectric as Jones su
In reply to fznidar...@aol.com's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:48:00 -0400
(EDT):
Hi Frank,
Which property of a nucleon exactly is "flipping"?
>Not fusion not fission. It is nucleon flipping due to an greatly increased
>range and strength of the strong nuclear spin orbit force.
>
>
>Frank Zni
Be careful crediting me with being a fast study, it will get to my head and
I'll be as arrogant as our own resident "expert" who studied under Feynman.
:-)
Actually, truth be told, I am just trying to keep up with you, Fran, ChemE,
Frank, Axil and others. You guys postulate things that take m
Fran,
Jones has suggested that I go to your site to study your post about casimer
cavitites; in fact, I've been to your blog several times, but most of what you
are saying is beyond my paygrade. I have no idea how to interpret what you are
saying.
So, can you help me out. Based on your the
In reply to ChemE Stewart's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:48:23 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>The bugger becomes that if this reaction is triggering local fission,
>fusion and high temperature chemical events (as it appears to be from a
>wide range of data) it will most likely degrade and collapse over tim
Jones,
I'm ok with your posit crediting the extra energy to these slight
atomic overages , it is an olive branch to those that still insist this a
nuclear reaction despite the fleeting amount of ash while leaving the door open
for those of us that credit ZPE as being a key ingredient. Yo
Sounds like you are a fast study, JoJo.
Fran Roarty has got a lot of detailed info on Casimir on his site, and there
are lots of specialized papers on CNT online. Other than that, you may be
breaking new ground - so the best advice is to be thorough, keep good lab
notes, report problems, consider
How does one achieve this quasi nuclear reaction of releasing excess bosonic
glue?
Do you put H+ ions within 2-12 nm apart from each other? Put both of them
is a cavity 2-12 nm in size?
Or put an H2 molecule in a cavity 2-12nm in size and ionize them. Their
recombination should "release" t
Frank, how does one achieve this nucleon flipping? Give me something that I
can test experimentally.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:It's fission
Not fusion not fissio
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro
So, you are hypothesizing fission of Nickel? Wouldn't that
be unlikely considering that nickel is such a stable element? ...What would
be the fission reaction paths ending up with these elements.
Jojo,
I h
Yes Jones, I realized my stupidity before you responded. You are right
about 2He decaying.
Also, I was hoping to avoid D2 gas due to expected neutron radiation. But
now it looks like I may have to use it.
These are the kinds of things that I am hoping you experts can correct me
on.
Jojo
Not fusion not fission. It is nucleon flipping due to an greatly increased
range and strength of the strong nuclear spin orbit force.
Frank Znidarsic
-Original Message-
From: Jojo Jaro
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Aug 24, 2012 4:52 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:It's fission
Never mind, I open
From: Jojo Jaro
If I am understanding you correctly, you are saying that p +
p would result in 2He, which would would quickly decay back to p and p
again, resulting in net energy loss.
Not exactly. Most of the di-protons in the short time they exi
OK, once again, I'm an idiot. I mouth off before investigating the matter.
So, in fact, you're right. 2He does indeed decay back to H+ and H+. I forgot
to realize that stable Helium is 4He not 2He.
But 1H + 11B should be an ideal fusion reaction, right? No hard radiation?
Jojo
--
TGIF is the mantra of working stiffs everywhere, and today is no exception,
so I'll keep this one shorter and sillier than most weekenders, and then
your outta here.
"Silly" also means it's a good day for PerpMos (perpetual motion
aficionados) to speak up; yet one of these days, someone ultra-sil
Never mind, I opened my mouth before I had the chance to read and comprehend
what you are saying. I do that many times in my excitement. I'm an idiot.
So, you are hypothesizing fission of Nickel? Wouldn't that be unlikely
considering that nickel is such a stable element?
What would be the
Jones, I read then reread then reread again this post to make sure I fully
understand the implication of what you are saying.
If I am understanding you correctly, you are saying that p + p would result in
2He, which would would quickly decay back to p and p again, resulting is net
energy loss.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Ruby wrote:
>
> An alert viewer let me know about the 10^12 is a trillion typo.
Like I said in my private message, what's an order of magnitude error
among friends?
I also edited the DGT post but it won't reappear until the moderators
approve the edit.
T
Can you hypothesize a starting element that would produce these elements via
fission? Ni
Jojo
PS. On a lighter note, I am glad that you view my theory and explanation to be
sufficiently credible for you to put it in league with Ed Storms. Comparing
my theory with DGT is fair and pr
An alert viewer let me know about the 10^12 is a trillion typo.
I HAD to upload a fresh vid, couldn't get the tweak right in Youtube
Storms interview UPDATED video link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNodilc6su0
Getting to the youtube, most people will be able to find it.
Woo hoo - the
http://defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1419
Defkalion GT stated
*On the other hand, the trace of Li, Bi and B in ICPMS analysis of NAE
after the reactions/interactions in Hyperion reactors, is a strong evidence
of nucleosynthesis of light elements (H to B), relating gamma absorptio
Kelley Trezise wrote:
**
> In what proportions are these transmutations occuring. If they are
> one-hundredthousandth of the amount of fusion of deurium and so contribute
> little in the way of net heat out . . .
>
As far as I know, they contribute far less energy than the deuterium
reactions.
Perhaps of relevance is the H-Chain modeling described in this paper:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.1746v1.pdf
The homogeneous (i.e., equispaced), linear, and peri-
odic chain of Hydrogen atoms (hereafter, the H-chain) is
commonly believed to be the simplest physical system de-
scribed by the one-ban
I received some interesting responses in this thread:
http://defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1419
T
Dave,
I started my career with Honeywell in industrial controls so I understand
your viewpoint and agree.
The bugger becomes that if this reaction is triggering local fission,
fusion and high temperature chemical events (as it appears to be from a
wide range of data) it will most likely degrade
I have heard that it depends on which isotopes of nickel are involved.
harry
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Bob Higgins wrote:
> Peter Hagelstein says that transmutation of nickel to copper is overall
> endothermic.
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you
have dislocations been considered?
http://www.ic.arizona.edu/ic/mse257/class_notes/disclocation.html
http://kasap3.usask.ca/images/photos/dislocation.gif
harry
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Kelley Trezise wrote:
> In what proportions are these transmutations occuring. If they are
> one-hund
On 08/24/2012 12:54 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
I guess even though it might me simpler just having three wheels, a tricycle
will not attract babes like at the end of the video...
There's a big difference between riding a three vs a two wheel
OK, I played a bit more with the model to see if this sort of behavior was
demonstrated. Actually it was relatively easy to incorporate a mechanism that
did the trick.
I reviewed the picture of the Rossi test cylinder and realized that the surface
of the device was radiating the heat that was
In what proportions are these transmutations occuring. If they are
one-hundredthousandth of the amount of fusion of deurium and so contribute
little in the way of net heat out they are just a side reaction but an
important one as they provide testament of a nuclear reaction. The
transmutation o
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> I guess even though it might me simpler just having three wheels, a tricycle
> will not attract babes like at the end of the video...
There's a big difference between riding a three vs a two wheeler.
It's in the dynamics.
T
Three people have now volunteered to proofread my paper. That's enough!
Thank you, everyone.
Thanks also to the people who assisted me before the conference, especially
Jim Dunn.
I think the presentation was well received.
- Jed
Wired wrote them up a couple of months ago:
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2012/05/lit-motors-c1/
They are in Alameda, on the old air base. Same place Myth-busters films most
of their overrated debunking.
(for trivia nuts the photos above are approximately where the Interstate
chase scene in the M
I guess even though it might me simpler just having three wheels, a
tricycle will not attract babes like at the end of the video...
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> You will love Lit:
>
> http://litmotors.com/
>
> albeit, a bit more expensive.
>
> T
>
>
Stewart
You will love Lit:
http://litmotors.com/
albeit, a bit more expensive.
T
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:23 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
> Well, no, it’s not illegal, but if your send a troll or someone like
> MaryYugo over here, we might have to tickle you until Rossi does a proper
> test to satisfy the Collective!
That could be cruel, unusual, possibly perpetual punishment
I agree with Frank.
I will only add that a local STRONG QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL FORCE can also
red-shift any energy that escapes its grasp, resulting in weak radiation to
outside observers. It also has the advantage of creating collective, high
energy blue-shifted radiation near the SOURCE of quant
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:10 AM, wrote:
> Clearly that is not only not the case, but pixels there were "dead" in one
> image
> are suddenly "live" again in the next
Yes, this is the explanation by the same NASA that put solar panels on
the fusion rocket.
T
Ed's theory can not explain the lack of radiation. The ONLY way a nuclear
reaction can proceed without producing radiation is in the case where the range
of the strong nuclear force exceeds that of the coulombic.
Ed start by assuming that the range of the force fields is not a conserved
pro
Well, Bob - this would depend on which isotopes of Ni are involved, as some
reaction could be gainful - but one thing that almost every expert agrees
on, is that if-and-when Nickel does transmute to Copper, one cannot end-up
with a natural copper isotope ratio as the ash.
Moreover, there will
Peter Hagelstein says that transmutation of nickel to copper is overall
endothermic.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> ** **
>
>
> If you want to show the heat came from the transmutation - that is a far
> different story, and Piantelli or no one else has come close to a
> c
Jojo, I recommend you to discuss the problem of LENR-2 openly and directly
with Edmund Storms- he is the most documented and knowledgeable in the
field of LENR and is very open minded. And nice. Plus he has good means for
doing experiments that can confirm or not the idea
Peter
On Fri, Aug 24, 201
From: Jojo Jaro
PS: On a different note, what would a p + p fusion reaction look like. I
have designed a new reactor with a view sight glass, hopefully, I'll see
some fusion reactions taking place.
This is where the problem arises. Sadly, you will probably never see it,
even if you loo
In Ruby's fine interview of Ed Storms, Ed mentioned his work on Carbon
Nanotubes. In fact, there was a picture of a landscape of open top Carbnon
nanotubes - i.e., Carbon nanohorns. He said that those tests were
unsuccessful. This was essentially what he told me the last time I asked him
abo
Oustanding work Ruby.
Does anyone know which paper of Roy Stanley he is referring to. Sorry, I am
not very informed about some of the work Ed Storms is referring to.
Jojo
PS: I will write some opinions about this video in my thread. I did not want
to interject my ideas here so as not to pol
The CNT hypothesis it is interesting in that it provides a way engineer the
nano-feature cavities. However, a problem may exist with this strategy if
Peter Hagelstein's theory is correct. According to Hagelstein, the excited
fused nucleus relaxes to a ground state by emitting multiple phonons due
Ruby Carat wrote:
". and I'm going to send any individuals interested in discussing the work
here to this thread. Is that illegal on Vortex?"
Well, no, it's not illegal, but if your send a troll or someone like
MaryYugo over here, we might have to tickle you until Rossi does a proper
test to s
62 matches
Mail list logo
