On 09/01/2012 04:24 PM, David L Babcock wrote:
An excerpt from Giza Dearth Star, link below:
[seen]..in two separate experiments in two different labs.
It isn't just solar flares that seem to induce changes in
radioactive decay rate. Changes in solar rotation and
activity,/and
Remember the electrical 'recycling' shown in the demo's of Bob Rohner?
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
correction to patent link:
open-source-energy.org/rwg42985/geert8550/EP1770715A1.pdf
Some more patents of Mehran Keshe:
https://register.epo.org/espacenet/advancedSearch?searchMode=advancedpn=ap=fd=pd=pr=prd=pa=mehran+keshein=re=op=ic=ti=
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
Remember the electrical 'recycling' shown in the demo's of Bob
My take on it:
It more resembles the type of inertial and magnetic confinement that a
reaction like this probably requires to minimize secondary fission and
fusion reactions with surrounding environment as well as EMF containment.
Similar to what Miley is investigating with NASA with aneutronic
I have paid and unpaid material out there. My free web site has averaged about
8 hits per day for the last 15 years. total count over that period is 44
thousand.
My paid amazon book averages about one book sale every six weeks except for
some unexplained bursts of sales.
Steve has
Heck, Mauro - perhaps they appreciate that you have an insightful
explanation, and it is one which they missed. Or do not want to deal with.
It would not surprise me (in general, as I do not know anything about them
in particular) - given the surprising vanity and the peer-pressure on
Lets help Steve with his first published article. Lets see what will be in it.
Widom Larson is the greatest.
Rossi is conducting a scam.
NASA loves Widom Larson
McKurbre loves Widom Larson.
I cant wait to get the first issue.
-Original Message-
From: fznidarsic
LOL. The only one you missed is:
Helium data doesn't match excess heat
From: fznidar...@aol.com
Lets help Steve with his first published article. Lets see what will be in
it.
Widom Larson is the greatest.
Rossi is conducting a scam.
NASA loves Widom
Who reads cold fusion material? From the responses to my web page I found the
following.
Nuclear Scientists NO!
Robert Park NO!
Women NO!
Academics NO!
Young white males between the ages or 14 and 20.YES!
And its the nerds of that age group. Rest of that group are reading
playboy and related material...
On Sunday, September 2, 2012, wrote:
Who reads cold fusion material? From the responses to my web page I
found the following.
Nuclear Scientists NO!
Robert Park NO!
Women NO!
From Jones:
...
Krivit, like it or not - has the most credibility in the field, since
Sterling is deemed as way too gullible, and the others have been mostly me
too with a few exceptions ... even if SK's standards are not sufficient for
us, here on vortex.
It seems to me that Mr. Krivit has
http://beforeitsnews.com/science-and-technology/2012/08/inventor-shows-5-fold-wireless-gain-of-amperage-between-equal-coils-2463024.html
I get in arguments all the time about what I am talking about, so this article
pretty much explains the special circumstances involved here, and it uses an
I tend to believe that in Rossie's last tubular reactor, the heat was being
generated from the ionization, collapse and radiation emmisions from air
within the center of the donut and that is why only the air and inside
surface of the cylinder are glowing. Those two sets of wires/coils are
just
Would a static electric field result in a polarization of Rydberg
hydrogen atoms? Also, since DGT implies that the Pm3m space group
enhances the NAE would that static field enhance the reaction?
T
I'll defer to Axil, but i would say yes. Rydberg matter is also nice and
dense allowing you to pack more matter into voids to get more fuel into
the chambers.
Stewart
On Sunday, September 2, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
Would a static electric field result in a polarization of Rydberg
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me that Mr. Krivit has attempted to present himself as an
investigative reporter cutting through all the bull sh*t in order to
get to the nittygritty of controversial subjects.
I question the need for investigative
http://www.gocomics.com/culdesac/2012/09/02
Cul de Sac by Richard Thompson
pop pop ... BANG pop BANG .. BANG BANG poppop BANG ... BANG Bang Pop Pfzzzt ..
pfz..ztz
The matter-antimatter matrix in your popper is higgeldy-piggeldy. I'll hit it
with a hammer and it should be good as new.
I was
I just finished participating in a QA during a dedicated live broadcast
with Mehran Keshe at the Smartscarecrowshow, guided by Sterling Alan.
I am totally negative of this whole stuff from Keshe now.
Patents have not been extended due to failed payments to the EPO.
Some of the people in the chat
Axil wrote:
The field of cold fusion and free energy systems has been a free for all
filled with some wild and crazy guys.
And it's that kind of chaotic environment that breeds innovation and will
bring forth the technologies that will make the world a better place for the
masses; it will
Here's an amazing and absolutely true video ... specially produced for
those vorticians who have already bought into Rohner, Steorn, Keshe and a
few of the other suppressed technologies :-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=GYW5G2kbrKk
attachment: winmail.dat
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Here's an amazing and absolutely true video ... specially produced for
those vorticians who have already bought into Rohner, Steorn, Keshe and a
few of the other suppressed technologies :-)
That one was taken seriously for
He seems to be calling the new 1MW configuration the honeycat -- which I take
to be a merger of honeycomb and ecat
Andrea Rossi
September 2nd, 2012 at 12:42 PM
Dear Italo R.
I am not kidding: in these days ( also today, even if it is Sunday) we are
working on the hot cat, and we are arriving
In the RF world we quite generally get large voltage transformations by using Q
to our advantage. In these cases, the equivalent impedance of the source is
transformed into another value. You never get additional power this way, just
slightly less at a different impedance due to losses
I assume you refer to inverse Rydberg (f/h) matter here. Normal Rydberg matter
is less dense from what I have seen.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012 2:07 pm
Subject: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:59 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I assume you refer to inverse Rydberg (f/h) matter here. Normal Rydberg
matter is less dense from what I have seen.
No, I refer to hydrogen with extra energy which forces the electron
into a higher energy state near
Dave,
I was looking at Rydberg matter densities and Inverted Rydberg densities
from this paper from Miley and others.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWSPROFESSORS/pdf/MileyClusterRydbLPBsing.pdf
On Sunday, September 2, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:59
I guess I was not aware of this situation Terry. Does this agree with quantum
mechanics? I think that they assume that the electron is in every location all
of the time unless measured. Of course, in every location it is location
according to the the wave function.
Are you convinced that
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:16 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I guess I was not aware of this situation Terry.
Well, look at the Lady in Red:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sommerfeld_ellipses.svg
from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_model
Granted that the Bohr model is
Sounds reasonable. I would think the ions may be more vulnerable/unstable
in this state, especially if they are densely packed in a compressed void
with the repulsion of the walls and with possible concentrated
charge/fields within.
On Sunday, September 2, 2012, ChemE Stewart wrote:
Dave,
I
The lady in red certainly has the appearance of a neutron if the electron
orbits in this time domain(classical) fashion. Can we assume that the ability
of Rydberg hydrogen to fuse relatively easily is evidence that quantum
mechanics is wrong? It is not clear to me that there would be much
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Granted that the Bohr model is simplistic; but, for a few hundreths of
a nanosecond, the Rydberg atom of hydrogen is essentially a neutron.
I think my time scale is off. We might be looking at hundreds of femtoseconds.
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:43 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The lady in red certainly has the appearance of a neutron if the electron
orbits in this time domain(classical) fashion. Can we assume that the
ability of Rydberg hydrogen to fuse relatively easily is evidence that
Not a problem. If a classical orbit is true for any length of time, quantum
mechanics has some explaining to do. Again, is this evidence for a hole in
that theory?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012
In chemistry, Schrödinger http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger,
Pauling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauling,
Mullikenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_S._Mulliken and
others noted that the consequence of Heisenberg's relation was that the
electron, as a wave packet, could not be
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:48 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Not a problem. If a classical orbit is true for any length of time, quantum
mechanics has some explaining to do. Again, is this evidence for a hole in
that theory?
LOL! Yeah, we call it LENR. :-)
I do not know; but,
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:53 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry is just saying the probability that the electron will be closer to the
neucleus is higher.
And in the presence of partially bound electrons in a broken lattice,
the word becomes restricted.
T
I was thinking of the other guy whose name is Heisenberg. The wave functions
do not have a time domain feature from what I recall. And then, any attempt to
locate the electron will shove it out of position. This discussion reminds me
of the dead/alive ECAT story. I do not claim to be an
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:58 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I was thinking of the other guy whose name is Heisenberg. The wave
functions do not have a time domain feature from what I recall. And then,
any attempt to locate the electron will shove it out of position. This
The only conflict is the mention of a period of time during which the electron
is in the near position. If we assume that there is merely a probability that
it is near the proton, then the shielding is not very good since that
probability must be low compared to all the other possible
Well, slap me silly. I would love to throw out QM! I was afraid that I am the
only one around these parts that feels that way. Maybe there are at least two
(three with Mills) of us.
Actually, it is a little premature to throw out a theory that has worked so
well for so long
Dave
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:16 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Actually, it is a little premature to throw out a theory that has worked so
well for so long
Or maybe the time is now.
Or not.
Happy Laborless day!
T
Same to you fellow...happy Labor less day!
If you think we have been under fire from the Physics community during the
recent period, just keep up the talk of throwing out their favorite bath water
baby. There will be few places to hide!
We are just kidding...honest!
Dave
-Original
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Water-Babies,_A_Fairy_Tale_for_a_Land_Baby
Landshark
http://www.telly.com/GVSNS?fromtwitvid=1
Dave,
I see them as tools. If you don't like using a wrench, use pliars and many
times you can solve the problem.
On Sunday, September 2, 2012, David Roberson wrote:
Well, slap me silly. I would love to throw out QM! I was afraid that I
am the only one around these parts that feels that
Le Sep 2, 2012 à 4:59 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com a écrit :
I assume you refer to inverse Rydberg (f/h) matter here. Normal Rydberg
matter is less dense from what I have seen.
It seems the oblong shape of Rydberg atoms causes them to become electrostatic
dipoles, which allows them
Le Sep 2, 2012 à 7:07 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com a écrit :
Okay, but what I'm sayin' is that in the crevasse of a partial crystal
lattice, those partial bound electrons restrict where the RSH fermion
might reside by exclusion.
Well, I can't go there.
And I can't go there.
http://www.canada.com/technology/Ship+historic+crossing+signals+extent+Arctic+melt/7176411/story.html
*I think upon Mackenzie, David, Thompson and the rest*
*Who cracked the mountain ramparts and did show a path for me*
*To race the roaring Fraser to the sea.*
*How then am I so different from
It is apparent that the oblong shape would result in a strong dipole behavior
provided that that nucleus is not in the center. The references that have been
suggested all show the nucleus of the atom as located at one foci. I must
admit that I do not understand why the orbit must change from
It would be ideal if the pseudo neutron can be formed which would then
penetrate the nucleus but I am afraid that the energy equations would not
balance. If there are two different paths to the same ultimate result, they
should release the same net energy.
What would be the proposed
49 matches
Mail list logo
