As noted here several times, coal is actually increasing in Europe. They
should do something about that. See:
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/03/what-do-struggling-gas-fired-plants-mean-for-renewables
QUOTE:
The idling of power stations built to last a generation is
Speaking of Philo and the Fusor ...
Farnsworth discovered an anomalous self-focusing space-charge phenomenon of
electrons - which made the Fusor viable. Normally the tendency is to think
that mutual Coulomb repulsion of electrons makes them impossible to control,
but in fact spheres of them
Why no mention of the WB series?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Speaking of Philo and the Fusor ...
Farnsworth discovered an anomalous self-focusing space-charge phenomenon of
electrons - which made the Fusor viable. Normally the tendency is to think
Do you mean the post was too short :-)
After all, I wanted to leave something for others, so the stage is yours.
From: James Bowery
Why no mention of the WB series?
No, I mean that if you are interested in magnetic enhanced electrostatic
confinement, there is no need to speculate.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Do you mean the post was too short J
** **
After all, I wanted to leave something for others,
Please forward to all your friends and put LENR on the docket:
http://futureenergy.ultralightstartups.com/campaign/detail/861
SmrtPwrNet has 100 votes more for #1, and printable photovoltaics has 50
less for third.
However you feel about this technology, we should be able to gather
Well Bussard has an approach which may work, but it may more likely be
burdened with a fundamental design error - in not fully capitalizing on
spherical convergence - since it or was closer to cubical.
IMHO proper spherical convergence needs at least 12 converging vectors at a
minimum, or
A message from the organizers: The ICCF-18 Conference registration is
open. Please distribute this message widely.
http://iccf18.research.missouri.edu/index.php
- Jed
I just voted for George Miley. While I was at the site I refreshed my
browser over a 15 minute period and the Printable Photovoltaics
entry went up 20 votes and it just keeps rising and George is now in
third place. I am a bit dubious of this voting.
Robert Dorr
At 09:37 AM 3/15/2013,
slipped to 3rd.
lost.
first used a facebook vote exchange site (not a bot, a human bot).
2nd used egyptian student network (more honest)
We are the only technology based network...
I agree that all that is a clown story, and I understand that some says it
is not dign..
Anyway it can raise
The geometry hasn't changed since he first released information on WB6 in
2006 about what he had been dong with the Navy for several years under a
Navy-imposed publishing embargo.
The subsequent developments of the WB series -- now up to WB8.1 -- have not
failed... to live up to promises as far
Well good. This must mean that they are finally out of milliwatt range?
Norton gives me a strong warning not to go to the Navy site (neco.navy.mil).
What is their power level these days and how many orders of magnitude away
from breakeven ?
From: James Bowery
The geometry
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:30:39 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Smart meters log exactly when you consume power, so the power company can
compare this to the times when excess power was available, and charge you a
An interesting paper - a printable copy is at URL:
Arc-liberated chemical energy exceeds electrical input energy
http://ose.accomazzi.net/files/15115795-Graneau-Paper-on-Water-Explosions.pdf
There are also seven papers that cite this one, availble thru google.
-- Lou Pagnucco
James Bowery
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Thu, 14 Mar 2013 22:04:51 -0600:
Hi Ed,
[snip]
Robin, according to my tables, the mass of a bare d is 2.014101778,
which is the value I used. I don't know where you got the idea an
electron is involved. These are nuclear reactions.
Ed
Your table is
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:56:35 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I don't think even Jones suggested D = H + n.
His words: Neutrons are 'stripped' from the deuterium
...and so they are, but only when either the neutron or the proton is
immediately absorbed by another nucleus. I
Robin, that is not my understanding. The values are from GE nuclear
Energy 15 Edition that give the mass of the nucleus. The mass is not
only obtained using a mass spectrometer. It is obtained by IUPAC using
a complex evaluation based on nuclear decay and energy measurements as
well. The
And you get your short term loan and it pays you back with interest. :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent mix...@bigpond.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 4:39 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Dilute D2O Cold Neutron Capture In Papp Engine?
In reply to James
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:55:45 -0600:
Hi Ed,
[snip]
Robin, that is not my understanding. The values are from GE nuclear
Energy 15 Edition that give the mass of the nucleus. The mass is not
only obtained using a mass spectrometer. It is obtained by IUPAC
Quoting from the conclusion of the article they reiterate the explanation
of the source of energy:
The difference in the latent heat between fog and bulk water is eventually
restored by heat in the atmosphere, which allows the fog to condense and
return to earth.
Does this make any sense to
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:41:12 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
First, Papp did not use hydrogen.
He may not intentionally have used it, but it was definitely present, either as
water or engine lubricating oil. The energy from the spark would be more than
enough to liberate some
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:43:42 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Quoting from the conclusion of the article they reiterate the explanation
of the source of energy:
The di?erence in the latent heat between fog and bulk water is eventually
restored by heat in the atmosphere, which
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:56:35 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I don't think even Jones suggested D = H + n.
His words: Neutrons are 'stripped' from the deuterium
...and so they are, but only when either the
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:43:42 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Quoting from the conclusion of the article they reiterate the
explanation
of the source of energy:
The di?erence in the latent heat between fog
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:02:49 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:56:35 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I don't think even Jones suggested D = H + n.
His words: Neutrons
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:05:34 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:43:42 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Quoting from the conclusion of the article they reiterate the
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:17 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:02:49 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:39 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:56:35 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:18 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:05:34 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:43:42 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Thanks Robin, I see the problem. In this case, both the d and the p
mass I used contains the electron. As a result, the energy change I
calculated is correct because the electron mass cancels out.
Nevertheless, this is not what Jones was claiming, so the value is not
relevant.
Ed
On Mar
I'm bummed. Hope he doesn't try it a third time, cause I don't think I
can put anymore time into another campaign like this.
I just don't have enough friends.
On 3/15/13 12:06 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
slipped to 3rd.
lost.
first used a facebook vote exchange site (not a bot, a human bot).
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:20:21 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
How could such a short-lived neutron could get to the engine block?
..the reaction happens at or in the wall of the engine block. e.g. D +
56Fe =
57Fe + H + 5.4 MeV, or D + 58Fe = 59Fe (radioactive) + H + 4.3
Robin,
Yes - in the O-P effect, as you say - one or the other nucleons of D is
absorbed by a target nucleus; and in the Fusor, it usually is the neutron.
When the neutron is absorbed the net energy is ~20% less even though the
mass of reactants cannot explain that difference, and the net
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:39:32 -0700:
Hi Jones,
Robin,
Yes - in the O-P effect, as you say - one or the other nucleons of D is
absorbed by a target nucleus; and in the Fusor, it usually is the neutron.
When the neutron is absorbed the net energy is ~20% less even
If my memory serves me correctly, it was Dr. Peter Graneau who wrote:
Ampere-Neumann Electrodynamics of Metals
which was advocating longitudinal forces.
In the latest issue of JSE is this interesting article:
The Journal of Scientific Exploration has just published its latest issue at
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:24:47 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
That's very problematic given Figure 6.
They're showing 10 gain in that figure from E7 to E12.
How can plasma physicists who are staking their careers on billions of
dollars of investment to get to near break be
Try this one:
http://www.fulviofrisone.com/attachments/article/375/Cross%20Section%20for%2
0Cold%20Deuterium-Deuterium%20Fusion.pdf
there is a newer one, but the citation is eluding me.
Fusion Technology apparently does not like for their articles to appear
online without a cash exchange
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:04 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:24:47 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
That's very problematic given Figure 6.
They're showing 10 gain in that figure from E7 to E12.
How can plasma physicists who are staking their
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:04 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
The sentence:-
The loss of intermolecular bond energy in the conversion from liquid to
fog
must be the source of the explosion energy.
... is the problem. First, they have the sign of intermolecular bond energy
wrong. When water
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:16:02 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:04 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:24:47 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
That's very problematic given Figure 6.
They're showing 10 gain
It should be noted that George Hathaway was a co-author on several of the
Graneau papers. He retracted some of conclusions:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg26685.html
“I published a rebuttal of the Graneau excess-energy claims a letter to the
editor of Infinite Energy
Well, of course he would retract the nonsense about ambient energy.
HOWEVER
Did Hathaway retract the experimental data presented? If not, then the
comparison of E7 to E12 still stands as true with very little in the way of
inference.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Jones Beene
Well, it would not be nonsense if there was gain from the zero point field.
That kind of gain is expected to carry ambient heat with it - with the side
effect of cooling the surroundings.
From: James Bowery
Well, of course he would retract the nonsense about ambient energy.
Touché
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Well, it would not be nonsense if there was gain from the zero point
field.
** **
That kind of gain is expected to carry ambient heat with it – with the
side effect of cooling the surroundings.
**
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:09:38 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Try this one:
http://www.fulviofrisone.com/attachments/article/375/Cross%20Section%20for%2
0Cold%20Deuterium-Deuterium%20Fusion.pdf
This is an interesting paper, but I have a few problems with it.
1) Kim
Yes. There are a number of papers proposing a counter-intuitive
environment-to-system heat energy concentration based on non-thermal
entropy exchanges (e.g. from spin baths) and/or taylored quantum
measurement wavefunction collapses.
Also, the anomalous effects surrounding lightning may be
I think that only way to make natural gas competitive, is to start fracking in
Europe. In France Poland and Ukraine, there is good fracking reserves for
natural gas, but this comes with high environmental cost.
Situation is indeed grim for natural gas, because gas price is rising and it is
46 matches
Mail list logo
