I have shared this concept before, here is try 2, I'd really like some
feedback I hope it is easy to understand and I think it is potentially
important.
The concept is that if a coil powdered with flat DC is suddenly moved, each
side of the solenoid sees it is in a new position and yet because
My essay seems to have disappeared. I do not find it at this link:
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2000
Is it just me, or have other people lost it?
- Original Message -
From: John Berry
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 2:47 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Electromagnetic inertia
I have shared this concept before, here is try 2, I'd really like some
feedback I hope it is easy to understand and I think it is
John--
Three points for clarification:
How is the solenoid move, along the axis, perpendicular to the axis or rotate
around the axis?
Do you assume the electrons within the solenoid move at the velocity and
acceleration of the solenoid? If so why?
Why do you assume the magnetic field moves
I don't see it eiither
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
My essay seems to have disappeared. I do not find it at this link:
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2000
Is it just me, or have other people lost it?
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see it eiither
Please tell this person:
*Kavita Rajanna*
Managing Director
m...@fqxi.org
There is no phone number.
I have a feeling they pulled it intentionally.
- Jed
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 6:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FQXi essay contest
My essay seems to have disappeared. I do not find it at this link:
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2000
Is it just me, or
Jed--
It had a lot of support compared to other essays. Thus, its missing from the
web page.
Seems like the contest is rigged, since it contrasted so much with the vote of
the fqxi community whose choice was way down in the public vote.
I still got to vote based on what I read yesterday,
Jed, I can't find it at that location either. It would be in bad form for them
to remove it from the contest just because it was winning. Perhaps it has been
moved and will reappear.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Seems like the contest is rigged, since it contrasted so much with the
vote of the fqxi community . . .
If it is rigged, you would think they would pull the entire essay page and
delete it from the index. This seems more like a glitch.
The whole page
Jed
I thought the same thing, You can see what I wrote to fqxi. If it were a
glitch they should send me a copy.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FQXi essay contest
Bob Cook
Jed, I hope that they did not deep 6 you after all of the excellent work you
did. You said this may happen. If they did, you can send it somewhere else.
They are looking for papers like that in Scotland but its a bit to far to
travel to. I sent you a note on this also.
Frank
Devices powered with nanotube based nuclear power systems may substantially
change the current state of power distribution.
-Retired U.S. Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle
Admiral Craig E. Steidle - USN, USNA, NASA. Steidle served as the Director
of the DoD Joint Advanced Strike Technology Office
When did he say this?
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Quote of the day
Devices powered with nanotube based nuclear power systems may substantially
Jones--
Nice alert--
The Cold Fusion Now web page has an item yesterday which parallels what
you have attributed to Steidle and makes the connection to cold fusion
clearly. Steidle and Christopher Cooper must be close. Steidle certainly
has had extensive and complete access to Govt. RD,
Yes - Bob - a related blog is where the quote came from. But it is undated,
Fran.
And yes, he could be referring to ZPE instead of LENR, but to my thinking,
it is too soon to try to differentiate the two, since both could be part of
the same anomaly.
Seldon's page
Or possibly the meniscus of bubble systems where gas bubbles becomes a plasma
and boundary regions are compressed by a steady sonar tone that can be
modulated on and off rapidly. A boundary doesn't have to be a perfect conductor
and the dynamic range of a resistive liquid meniscus boundary may
It's back up. Probably just a glitch.
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2000
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see it eiither
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
My essay seems to have
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2000
It's there and leaving the competition behind!
Commenter Joe Fisher show how much confusion raises when nuclear
appears inside a text...
2014-03-14 16:17 GMT+01:00 fznidar...@aol.com:
Jed, I hope that they did not deep 6 you after all of the
-Original Message-
... he [Admiral Steidle] could be referring to something else instead of
LENR and ... it is remotely possible that he is referring to another kind of
nanotube technology which does not involve LENR, or ZPE - but seriously -
what would that be?
OK. Let me clarify that
It's there and leaving the competition behind!
Go Jed!
-Original Message-
From: Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Mar 14, 2014 1:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FQXi essay contest
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2000
It's
It is back to normal. It was a temporary glitch. They sent me a note saying
oops, sorry.
Michele Comitini michele.comit...@gmail.com wrote:
It's there and leaving the competition behind!
That's thanks to my clique.
- Jed
Memo from Christy:
The full memoriam obituary of Dr. Peter Graneau is on the Infinite Energy
website at:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/GraneauMemoriam.pdf
You probably caused too much excitement for their servers to handle. Your
article is far better than the others. There are some goofy thinkers.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
It is back to normal. It was a temporary glitch. They sent me a note
You're featured at Cold Fusion Now
http://coldfusionnow.org/read-and-rate-cold-fusion-may-have-revolutionary-potential-by-jed-rothwell/
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
It is back to normal. It was a temporary glitch. They sent me a note
saying
Jones:
It is compelling that the protonated molecular hydrogen or H3+, and it
is the most abundant or second most abundant ion in the Universe, so it is
very common. It is also compelling that RPF is the most common fusion
reaction in the universe.
I consider RPF to be the Occham's Razor
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
You're featured at Cold Fusion Now
http://coldfusionnow.org/read-and-rate-cold-fusion-may-have-revolutionary-potential-by-jed-rothwell/
Another clique! This appears to be against the rules:
FQXi expects those providing community evaluations to do so
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
Three points for clarification:
How is the solenoid move, along the axis, perpendicular to the axis or
rotate around the axis?
In the case of increasing inertia, there is one solenoid and if you saw it
as an O
Entrants should alert FQXi with information if they witness such activities.
***Then you should probably alert them, to keep your effort above the noise
of suspicion.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
You're
- Original Message -
From: John Berry
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic inertia
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
Three points for clarification:
How
- Original Message -
From: John Berry
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic inertia
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
Three points for clarification:
How
John--
I would say that they do. If they didn't, it seems the magnetic fields coming
from the Sun to the earth would consistently have an arc concaved in the
opposite direction from the Sun's rotation. I do not think this is observed.
However, it may not have been looked for.
Bob
This auto cat converter system is consistent with the basic principles of
nano particle based cold fusion. Think of this system as a dry PF cell.
In a PF cell, HHO production and nanoparticle based LENR reactions would
happen as a unified reaction.
In this Hot Cat system nanoparticle production
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Entrants should alert FQXi with information if they witness such activities.
***Then you should probably alert them, to keep your effort above the
noise of suspicion.
I don't take this contest seriously. My entry will be instantly tossed out
by the
It is straightforward to now understand Rossi's mouse is just a remotely
operating nanoparticle generator for the catalytic based Cat.
Rossi just decoupled nanoparticle generation from their participation in
the LENR process catalyzed by the Cat stage of the Rossi Hot Cat.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
I would say that they do.
I assume you mean propagate instantaneously?
At least there is still the booby prize of disprovng SR.
If they didn't, it seems the magnetic fields coming from the Sun to the
earth
John--
Yes--I meant that I would say they propagate instantaneously. I think the
field lines come out straight from the Sun.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: John Berry
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic inertia
Then my idea is bust.
But so is Special Relativity.
There is no way for my idea to be wrong and Special Relativity to survive.
John
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
John--
Yes--I meant that I would say they propagate instantaneously. I think the
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This article says the Leaf electric car is selling well in Atlanta:
There are 4 in my office parking lot.
I talked to a fellow who has one. He says it takes forever to recharge with
a 120 VAC plug but he doesn't care.
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, that's where I work! Well, not in the strip joints (Adult
entertainment. Entrance in rear. touts one sign.)
That's great!
But, my office is
a mile away on Piedmont Rd.
Ah. Then you need to try the International Bakery, 2165 Cheshire Bridge
I looked at this and came up with the source of electromagnetic inertia is the
acceleration of an energy flow.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter7.html
-Original Message-
From: John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Mar 14, 2014 5:42 pm
From: Kevin O'Malley
It is compelling that the protonated molecular hydrogen or
H3+, and it
is the most abundant or second most abundant ion in the
Universe, so it is
very common. It is also compelling that RPF is the most
common
Jones said:
In order to have excess energy to shed, there must exist sequential RPF
between two of the three protons, which convert a tiny bit of nuclear mass
to spin energy. Degenerate spin of trihydrogen ions must be pumped back from
low-to-high for net excess. Such pumping is presumed to be
The population of the planet reached seven billion in October,
according to the United Nations. But what's the figure for all those
who have lived before us?
It is often said that there are more people alive today than have ever
lived - and this fact has raised its head again since the UN
What do you think of my proposal of a 2-stage LENR theory?
First stage, the 1DLEC. As previously discussed.
https://www.mail-archive.com/*vortex*-l...@eskimo.com/msg91418.html
2nd stage, RPF
The first stage generates some fusion events, and then RPF gets triggered.
RPF is nature's way of
45 matches
Mail list logo