Jesus told us to spread the good news, not to hide the light under a bowl.
He is a far higher authority than you.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
You are right. Whoever wrote Live by your believes and let others live
by theirs is a far wiser guy
How does one get to Vortex B? I'd like to witness this debate. My
prediction: None of the vorts who complained so loudly will be able to
mount any kind of defense of Darwinian religious viewpoint, nor will there
be any real debate from those who haven't complained so loudly. And also,
the
In response to my
Imagine that: the sun warms up planets, like ours.There's a distinct
lack of evidence for something that is supposed to be such a friggin
slam-dunk. When it is a slam-dunk, there's no need for fraud.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:50 PM, CB Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
send email to vortexb-l-requ...@eskimo.com with subscribe in subject line.
So far, only one person accepted my challenge. I am going thru his links to
study what proof he has provided. I'll respond to him as soon as I have
studied his links.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From:
Overall, the things not getting very meaningful after he spelled this three
letter acronym. I had discovered strong coupling between coils under self
resonance which is very impressive but I don't think this is a way
sufficient for generating anomalous energy.
More interesting is how one can
From: Bob Cook
* … I would only gloat to myself.
Feel free to gloat in a big public demonstration if gammaless fusion is
proved :-)
Side Note: There is a strange mentality, which is seen in some skeptics of
LENR – the relevant
Obviously I have some catch-up posting to do. I will begin with some of
the latter comments.
Jones, you exemplify the other side of the coin: If I thought of it, so it
must be right. We stand on the shoulders of giants. I read and try to
synthesize the best understanding I can piece together
All these electron combining with proton theories violate the conservation
of leptons. These reactions are forbidden.
Meson production does not violate conservation laws. I went with meson
production because of this.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are you proposing a BEC? A BEC cannot form at these temperatures,
This is not correct.
A polariton has a mass the is 10^-11 that of an electron. Because of this
almost zero polariton mass, a polariton condensate are almost always
produced at any temperature.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:21 PM,
Also if two DDL hydrogens fuse is the product a DDL helium?
If they do then the product would tend to look like tritium.
Harry
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Obviously I have some catch-up posting to do. I will begin with some of
the latter
Three additional points to add:
* I'm still waiting for a careful writeup of Mizuno's latest NiH/NiD work.
What we've seen are some slides. It seems premature at this point to draw too
many conclusions.
* We know relatively little about nickel systems compared to palladium systems.
I assume
I believe the thinking is that the fusion of DDL atoms begins with the
formation of a DDL pico-molecule. Meulenberg then proposes that the two
electrons in combination (his Lochon) are involved in the fusion. When
fusion would occur, the electrons are so close to the nucleus that they are
highly
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
All these electron combining with proton theories violate the conservation
of leptons. These reactions are forbidden.
Not if a neutrino is involved. (Not that I'm at all persuaded by the
proposed p-e-p reaction.)
Mesons in
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not correct.
A polariton has a mass the is 10^-11 that of an electron. Because of this
almost zero polariton mass, a polariton condensate are almost always
produced at any temperature.
Could you point us to
electrons cannot be converted to something that contain quarks. this
violates the conservation of both lepton and baryon number. This reaction
might therefore be forbidden as a violation of particle conservation laws.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
A electron neutrino is produced.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
All these electron combining with proton theories violate the conservation
of leptons. These reactions are forbidden.
You are automatically subscribed when you subscribe here.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
How does one get to Vortex B? I'd like to witness this debate. My
prediction: None of the vorts who complained so loudly will be able to
mount any kind of
http://www.umich.edu/~mctp/SciPrgPgs/events/2010/MQSS10/Talks/Littlewood_Michigan_PBL.pdf
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not correct.
A polariton has a mass the is 10^-11
I don't think that's true Terry. I had to explicitly subscribe before I can
post to it.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 1:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Anyone want to debate Darwinian Evolution
I just posted this the other day,,,
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1112.1298v1.pdf
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.umich.edu/~mctp/SciPrgPgs/events/2010/MQSS10/Talks/Littlewood_Michigan_PBL.pdf
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Eric Walker
Correction: Muon neutrino
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
A electron neutrino is produced.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
All these
It's possible BillB changed it. Thx.
- Reply message -
From: Jojo Iznart jojoiznar...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Anyone want to debate Darwinian Evolution with me in VortexB
Date: Mon, Sep 1, 2014 2:03 PM
I don't think that's true Terry. I had to explicitly
So many egregious errors ... so little time to correct them all...
Bob Higgins: This business of Rossi using a radioactive ingredient is a Bozo
speculation based on absolutely nothing. And Rossi is not the only one to
measure gamma from a LENR experiment ...
Oh... Rossi measured gamma? News
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.umich.edu/~mctp/SciPrgPgs/events/2010/MQSS10/Talks/Littlewood_Michigan_PBL.pdf
Following are the rough specs of the polaritons described in these slides:
- Temperatures on the range of 0 - 16 K.
- Photon
Does anyone here understand this branch of science?
Superradiance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Superradiance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In physics, the term superradiance is used to refer to radiation enhancement
effects in several contexts including quantum
Well, as I went back and checked, it was the earlier paper Focardi wrote
describing Piantelli's Ni-H experiments where Focardi reported substantial
gamma. You talk about a Mizuno hero experiment where Mizuno reports 108
MJ, in this Focardi paper, Piantelli had one experiment over 900 MJ and
I am fine with whatever you believe Kevin. Just get happy. My opinion is
just none of your business as I do not need anyone to endorse my believes.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
Try this one
http://arxiv.org/vc/arxiv/papers/1210/1210.7086v1.pdf
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
And yet, you try to knock others' beliefs out of Vortex because you're so
insecure in your own beliefs. Typical of a strategic follower rather than
a strategic leader.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com
wrote:
I am fine with whatever you believe Kevin. Just
Well, supper's done and I found the reference I was looking for. This is
an interview with Sergio Focardi where he talks about the technology. He
says radiation is present and that is why they have the lead. He talks
about having a radiation detector outside the reactor to shut down the
reactor
Greetings Vortex-L:
From 2013
The last slide show on Woodroof..pages 1-40 are the most interesting:
http://www.openminds.tv/ufo-files-reveal-british-ministry-of-defence-monitors-anti-gravity-research-1063/22488
Ron Kita, Chiralex
Also..see the comment section in the website above.
Note;The
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, supper's done and I found the reference I was looking for ...
- A radio interview with Sergio Focardi, the father of 'Ni-H Cold
Fusion'; Radio Citta del Capo - Bologna - Italy.
Excellent sources, Bob. I
From: Bob Higgins
* Yes, I am quite aware that some researchers have salted their experiments
with radioactive isotopes. I also know that Dennis Cravens sometimes use
thorium oxide for that purpose (he showed me his jar). That doesn't mean that
Piantelli or Rossi did.
Where did
From: Bob Higgins
*
* Well, supper's done and I found the reference I was looking for. This is an
interview with Sergio Focardi where he talks about the technology.
The material from 2004 is irrelevant wrt Rossi
* In Focardi's 2010 paper with Rossi, Focardi describes the
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The material from 2004 is irrelevant wrt Rossi
Most obviously not.
no radiation was observed at levels greater than natural radiation
background. No radioactivity has been found also in the Nickel residual
from the
You must be joking right?
Only a fool makes a gamma measurement outside the lead.
Please read the Bianchini report. He is very clear about how the readings were
taken: UNDER THE LEAD
Jones
From: Eric Walker
Jones Beene wrote:
The material from 2004 is irrelevant wrt
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
You must be joking right?
Only a fool makes a gamma measurement outside the lead.
Not true, even a little. There are very good reasons for taking gamma
measurements outside of lead, the primary one being to ensure that
From: Eric Walker
You must be joking right
Only a fool makes a gamma measurement outside the lead.
Not true, even a little. There are very good reasons for taking gamma
measurements outside of lead, the primary one being to ensure that the device
can operate safely around humans.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
You still have not shown that Rossi ever reported gamma radiation in an
operating E-Cat ! Please – put up or shut up.
Please read the interview.
Eric
39 matches
Mail list logo
