[Vo]:Re: Cross section reduction at lower energies

Stefan-- Thanks for those answers. A thought I had is that the 0 spin (if it exists) is really a superposition of the + and – intrinsic spin states—an epo like particle held in place by gravity of the nucleus, circulating at a close radius consistent with the respective masses of the “epo”

RE: [Vo]:Ni+LAH systems not performing

(resend – is anyone else having trouble posting?) From: Jack Cole * I wrote a short post about two papers that are of interest, but are negative regarding Ni+LAH. Jean-Paul Biberian has conducted a series of experiments with the Parkhomov formula … after some 20 experiments utilizing

RE: [Vo]:Muon Detection app and Holmlid seminar

From: Blaze Spinnaker http://news.wisc.edu/23166 Ø Very cool of MFMP to do this... Maybe they can try replicating it [muon detector for mobile phone] ? Problem is – the “detector” is the iphone camera with the lens covered, which will pick up

[Vo]:Re: Muon Detection app and Holmlid seminar

A little lead in front of the lens would tend to reduce the detection for gammas but not much for muons. That way the app may be able to identify the muons with higher accuracy. National Instruments should be interested. Bob Cook From: Jones Beene Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 7:31 AM

Re: [Vo]:Re: Muon Detection app and Holmlid seminar

Sorry, too much wine. Cool that MFMP was meeting with Holmlid's co-author and looking into the ultra dense hydrogen. I thought the muon detector was cool. Are people doing muon detection as a part of their replication efforts? On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Bob Cook

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Good question, as I understand there is standing wave fields between the >> shells so the volume is indeed filled up

Re: [Vo]:Ni+LAH systems not performing

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > BTW Jack – if memory serves, you used iron oxide and potassium in an early > experiment which melted the heating wire ... > > (a special spillover catalyst called “Shell 105”, used by Holmlid, > contains iron oxide and

Re: [Vo]:Ni+LAH systems not performing

Jack Cole wrote: > > My conclusion at this point is that nickel and LiAlH4 does not reliably > produce excess heat, and if it does at all, it is rare. > I agree these results call into question Lugano and Parkomov, but it is too early to conclude that LiAlH4 does not work

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good question, as I understand there is standing wave fields between the > shells so the volume is indeed filled up electromagnetically couldn't this > explain what you are after. > The volume in

Re: [Vo]:Re: Swedish scientists claim LENR explanation break-through

Jones Beene wrote: > Jed Rothwell has put countless hours and his own funds over 25 years to > memorialize the efforts of dozens of scientists and thousands of papers. None > of these experiments going back to 1989 – representing 25 years of blood, > sweat and tears - has

[Vo]:Re: Cross section reduction at lower energies

Stefan and Eric-- It happens when magnetic fields which penetrate the nucleus easily are present. That is what stimulates nuclear transitions in MRI machines if I understand the stimulating input correctly. I nothing else, the changing magnetic field associated with the magnetic moments of

Re: [Vo]:Ni+LAH systems not performing

Jones, Yes, good memory on the potassium and iron oxide. Specifically, I used KOH, aluminum, nickel, Fe2O3, and LAH. There were a few experiments with quick thermal accelerations followed by melting wires. My instrumentation at the time was not good enough to determine if it was a power spike

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: The end result is that you get a 6 digit match between calculated and > meassured ionisation energy for Hydrogene and similar accuracy for the one > electron ions. > I assume this a claim that goes back to

Re: [Vo]:Re: Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > Stefan-- > > Thanks for reporting on your study of GUTUP. > > That’s a nice explanation of Mill’s theory. > > Do you see a magnetic field couple between the nuclear spin and the > electronic spin (angular momentum of the

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The end result is that you get a 6 digit match between calculated and >> meassured ionisation energy for Hydrogene and

[Vo]:Lateral Topic: James Hutton - father of modern geology

This ​one hour video ​ is ​the ​ first part ​ of a three part BBC series (2010) called Men of Rock ​.​ ​The first half is​ about James Hutton and his geological observations in the second half of the 18th century that ​supported his​ idea th ​at the​ Earth ​is so old that it has​ "no vestige

[Vo]:Lateral Topic: James Hutton - father of modern geology

This ​one hour video ​ is ​the ​ first part ​ of a three part BBC series (2010) called Men of Rock ​.​ ​The first half is​ about James Hutton and his geological observations in the second half of the 18th century that ​supported his​ idea th ​at the​ Earth ​is so old that it has​ "no vestige

[Vo]:Black holes in LENR

In Leonid Urutskoev’s experiments, one more indicator that these micro balls of lightning are black holes seen there are their very long lifetimes. This lifetime is longer than the time it takes to dry the residue from the exploding foil experiment and expose the dusty residue on a photographic

Re: [Vo]:Cross section reduction at lower energies

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >In the model of infinitesimally thin orbitspheres with a charge >> distribution >described by spherical harmonics, how

[Vo]:Muon Detection app and Holmlid seminar

http://news.wisc.edu/23166 Very cool of MFMP to do this. Maybe they can try replicating it? http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/10/16/sri-international-to-host-seminar-on-ultra-dense-hydrogen-and-low-energy-nuclear-reactions/ On Thursday, October 22nd, 2015 (10:30 AM PDT), Sveinn Ólafsson of the

[Vo]:the best LENR technology needs the help of the highest level theories

See please this: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/oct-18-2015-lenr-war-will-be-won-on.html We start learning a lot of things from the recent Workshop. Theories almost indistinguishable from philosophy are practical Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Re: Cross section reduction at lower energies

Stefan-- Thanks for reporting on your study of GUTUP. That’s a nice explanation of Mill’s theory. Do you see a magnetic field couple between the nuclear spin and the electronic spin (angular momentum of the orbitshperes), and, if so, does it change with the size of the nucleus? If the

Re: [Vo]:Electron-mediated alpha decay in quasi-stable isotopes

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jones Beene wrote: Both of you appear to be off by a factor of 1000 and this paper does not > deal with large clusters anyway. > > And most importantly - this was a simulation. As soon as I realized the paper was a theoretical calculation,

RE: [Vo]:ALL THE PAPERS FROM THE AIRBUS-ISCMNS WORKSHOP

Thanks Peter. The latest from Paillet & Meulenberg is one of the better papers here, and it sews up a few lose ends from Vavra: “Electron Deep Orbits of the Hydrogen Atom” : https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BZ3Y0Z1N4WGFReUg5Z19UVEJlWE43cU56d0lV/view?usp=sharing But

RE: [Vo]:Electron-mediated alpha decay in quasi-stable isotopes

Both of you appear to be off by a factor of 1000 and this paper does not deal with large clusters anyway. And most importantly - this was a simulation. There is no evidence of this kind of explosion actually happening in the real world. In fact, it would be nearly impossible to fully ionize a