In reply to Brian Ahern's message of Tue, 30 Jan 2018 22:54:07 +:
Hi,
There is another point here too. IIRC a mass spec works by ionizing a particle
then measuring the mass to charge ratio. A deep level D2* molecule has an
ionization potential in the tens of kV, so is unlikely to be detected
Question: When does the message arrive before the sending of it, viewed from
the past history? Or maybe I got that methodology wrong but the way things
here on yahoo sometimes work is they omit the sending message to recipients,
but then they allow the seemingly censored info to go through as
Good point! Thanks for the clarification of my mis-calculation.
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 2:58 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CMNS: Re: [Vo]:Science does sometimes reject valid discoveries
In reply to
Harvey D Norris's answer to Has the theory of relativity ever been applied to
electromagnetic fields? - Quora
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |
Harvey D Norris's answer to Has the theory of relativity ever been appl...
| |
|
|
Pioneering the Applications of
In reply to Brian Ahern's message of Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:24:09 +:
Hi,
[snip]
>I did not mean to discredit Mel's work. I am sure it was well done, but it is
>difficult to measure 100mWatts of excess energy when Gerald Pollack says that
>amount of energy can simply be stored in the water from
I agree about Pollack, indeed I have him to blame for my interest in
LENR. I agree that there may well be a closer link between LENR and
Jerry's exclusion zone ideas. Indeed, that lies behind the neutrino
ideas that I posted here a month or so ago.
Nigel
On 30/01/2018 17:04, Brian Ahern
Pollack is amazing.His work is uncomfortable for the old guard to incorporate
into their world view. CF/LANR should face his observations since they are both
looking at effects in liquid water at low electric fields.
From: Nigel Dyer
The forces are different by 10*36, so comparisons are impossible to measure.
From: John Berry
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 3:54 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons
>From the patent... "a free
I tend to think that his ideas on this specific aspect, the formation of
'exclusion zones' at the surfaces of blood vessels may also be an
important factor, and that the two effects may well work in tandem.
On 30/01/2018 12:27, Brian Ahern wrote:
see gerald pollack for the flow issue.
see gerald pollack for the flow issue.
From: Nigel Dyer
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 2:56 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Physicists just found a loophole in graphene that could
unlock clean, limitless energy - ScienceAlert
I did not mean to discredit Mel's work. I am sure it was well done, but it is
difficult to measure 100mWatts of excess energy when Gerald Pollack says that
amount of energy can simply be stored in the water from background illumination.
The lack of ionizing radiation is a great hurdle to
>From the patent... "a free electron has inertial mass but not gravitational
mass." and "Thus, a free electron is not gravitationally attracted to
ordinary matter. "
Really? Can that really add up?
Pretty sure this is not very much in agreement with conventional theory.
John Berry
On Tue,
12 matches
Mail list logo