On 07/25/2013 09:55 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Craig mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> It is a better test than the one that Levi and company performed. This
> is a complete and total, independent, replication of Rossi's method;
> even if t
kely adopt this method of stimulus if they haven’t
> already done so.
>
> Fran
>
>
Didn't Rossi use this method in the Oct 6, 2011 demo? He called it an
'RF Generator", which he brought in when it appeared the heating wasn't
going to start the reaction as fast as he had hoped.
Craig
new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US
Craig
ny performed. This
is a complete and total, independent, replication of Rossi's method;
even if they don't plan to write it up.
Craig
while you were there.All the best!Craig
Original Message
Subject: [Vo]:Forbes LENR Coverage
From: Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com>
Date: Wed, July 24, 2013 1:23 pm
To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Ladies and Gentlemen,Following my last post
Lewan: " Calculations based on heating water only. However, at the
output I only saw steam. No water dropping."
https://twitter.com/matslew/status/359784137680367616
For those that wanted an independent replication of Rossi's experiment,
this was it, aside from the write-up. They replicated the process from
the ground - up, in two years.
Are they planning to write-up the process, or are they trying to keep it
secret, too?
Craig
On 07/23/2013 04:17 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> In any event, calculating the COP as if it were water is a MAJOR
> under-estimate.
Did they mention this? That they are underestimating like this?
Otherwise, it makes them look sloppy.
Craig
7,500 calories / minute =
57,500 calories / minute X 60 minutes = 3,450,000 calories / hour =
3,450,000 calories / hour X 1.163E-6 kWh / calories =~ 4,000 kWh/h
Craig
On 07/23/2013 03:52 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
>>> See my Steam Calculator at http://tinyurl.com/def-1240
>> I adde
On 07/23/2013 03:52 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
>> See my Steam Calculator at http://tinyurl.com/def-1240
> I added the reported input temperature (ambient isn't used)
> COP -- Water : 3.8 Steam: 13.8
>
>
Can you publish the calculations you use for water and for steam?
Thanks,
Craig
Looks like ignition!
http://new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US
Craig
that's the best sign of all that the results are what
they appear to be.
Craig
On 07/23/2013 01:10 PM, Charles Francis wrote:
>
> Test is looking professional so far and promising. One concern for me
> though is that after all that careful flow calibration, they switched
> the water
Today is the break-out day. Two groups, both getting high power, high
quality results?
People will start to take a lot more notice.
Craig
<http://new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US>
> No idea how to get to this on line. Sorry.
http://new.livestream.com/triwu2/Defkalion-US
Craig
Can you provide a link? I don't have the link to the demo.
Craig
On 07/22/2013 07:13 AM, Charles Francis wrote:
>
> Shows COP of 5
>
>
>
Excellent news! Rossi's technology is spreading on his terms, with his
contracts, apparently without a US or European patent.
Craig
On 07/09/2013 01:31 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
> Andrea Rossi
> July 8th, 2013 at 10:25 PM
> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=810&cpag
http://rt.com/news/fukushima-manager-yoshida-dies-cancer-829/
Craig
Things sometimes seem "far out" to those in our society with closed minds.
There are many strange things in the world - a lot of which cannot be
explained by measurement, in a lab, or depending on whether a peer review
has been conducted or not. Too many people see authority as the truth and
not t
so relentless in their mission
to debunk?
From: "Craig Brown" <cr...@overunity.co>
Date: Thu, June 06, 2013 2:11 pm
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Naval scientist Eldon Byrd put it rather succinctly when he said – “What major contribution has any sceptic made to the betterment of huma
Naval scientist Eldon Byrd put it rather succinctly when he said –
“What major contribution has any sceptic made to the betterment of
humankind? How many Mother Teresa’s have they produced? How many great
scientific discoveries have they made? Many of them are like movie
critics–useless and
This link below is to my own site where I have assembled some of the major character traits of pseudos. I had plenty of real life experience of these clowns owing to the fact that they were at infestation levels on the Steorn forum before they all got banned for trolling. Mary Yugo, Pennies_Everyw
Often pseudosceptics have a high opinion of themselves, see themselves as elite. It is interesting that a disproportionately high number of pseudosceptics have an interest in magic.Most however, appear to suffer from Imagination Deficiency Personality IDPFictional miss-identification: Often an IDP
I'm sure you've seen this one, as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQLCZOG202k
On 06/03/2013 09:14 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> See a flash mob performance celebrating the reopening of the Rijksmuseum:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a6W2ZMpsxhg
>
> This kind of thing
FRENCH
Original Message
Subject: [Vo]:OT: scrabble challenge
From: Harry Veeder
Date: Mon, June 03, 2013 3:14 pm
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
With the seven letters LENR CF H make a word. Harry
Frank, is there an electronic version of your book? I clicked on your
link below thinking that I could buy a version for my Kindle, but it
only seems to be in paper.
Craig
On 05/29/2013 08:45 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Energy-Cold-Fusion-Antigravity-
rder to compensate for an inability to remember detail. So the weakness
in memory is offset by an increase in the ability to find solutions and
reconstruct that which I've forgotten.
Craig
On 05/23/2013 09:04 AM, Craig wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 11:01 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>> It is s
emory, I have to spend time trying to
get the information to them. It then becomes easy to throw back an
answer before I've ascertained the validity of the answer. This aspect
of Rossi reminds me a lot -- of me. It takes a bit of effort to be precise.
Craig
means what
it used to but has been hijacked by these insects.
Read my website for more details.
http://truthfall.com/pseudoscepticism/
Craig
-Original Message-
From: William Beaty [mailto:bi...@eskimo.com]
Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013 4:08 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:skept
On 04/24/2013 07:26 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> "We just shouldn't grant machines the decision about who lives or dies"
> Noel Sharkey, Chairman of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control.
>
I, for one, welcome our new robot masters...
On 03/25/2013 08:07 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
> Prometon s.r.l issued a related press release (in Italian):
> http://www.22passi.it/downloads/Comunicato_stampa_Prometeon_25_3_2013.pdf
>
Here's the Google translation:
BOLOGNA. Completed the day before the test VALIDATION
and the Hot Cat by third-
In 2004, the last widow of a civil war veteran died.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/5106000/ns/us_news/t/last-widow-civil-war-veteran-dies/#.UUtlrLLOMkc
Craig
On 03/21/2013 03:52 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I read yesterday that two people in the U.S. are still receiving
> disability pensions fr
I just posted on my Free Energy Truth Facebook page. We have over 19,000 members, so should get a vote or two ;-)
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miley Arpa-E startup project reloaded! vote for for
10 days.. hurry up
From: Ruby
Date: Wed, March 06, 2013 9:28
an threaten enough people, and take enough money from them, is
preposterous.
Craig
propose to pay for it?
Do you want to take money from those who do not believe in your plan,
nor agree with it? Do you want to take money from taxpayers?
That's always the rub with government-fostered experiments.
Craig
server_effect_%28physics%29
Craig
On 02/07/2013 02:19 AM, Chuck Sites wrote:
> Hi Craig, and fellow vortexians,
>
> I'm looking at your graph on temperature anomalies and every data
> point is above 0. Shouldn't some of you anomalies be negative. You
> have 16 years of positive anomalies but
On 02/06/2013 04:20 PM, Craig wrote:
> On 02/06/2013 04:08 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> It is a myth that temperatures have not increased in 16 years. The
>> people making this claim started with the highest outlier point 16
>> years ago. See:
>>
>
> I do
and you can draw it yourself and take your own copy of the data here:
http://climexp.knmi.nl/selectfield_obs.cgi?someone@somewhere
And to Chris Zell,
Your post on the economics of global warming is relevant. Your message
came in when several other messages came in, which were just making jokes.
Craig
Please stop hijacking this discussion.
Thanks,
Craig
On 02/06/2013 09:27 AM, Chris Zell wrote:
> Blah, blah, blah.."living from paycheck to paycheck".
>
> The discussion begins and ends there, simply by defining what the
> phrase means. With greater advances in
Less solar input should mean less average
> global temperature rise from sun cycles.. What does effect the solar
> input is seasonal. The Earth-Sun orbit is elliptical so at certain
> times of the year we are closer to the sun than the other half. So
> yes Craig, I will agree that on
tand corrected on the cyclical nature of CO2. I understand now,
that you are correct, in that during the summer, the CO2 levels fall, so
this would be the opposite to what I had assumed, which was the during
the summer the CO2 levels rose. Good point.
>
> Craig, I appreciate your wanting to fin
isn't it 'possible' that solar activity is driving the temperature and
the temperature is driving the CO2 increases -- to SOME degree?
Since there is no logical way that temperature changes could drive solar
activity, then solar activity is driving the temperature to some degree.
Tha
Do you have a link to it?
Craig
On 02/03/2013 01:38 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> Swedish TV program on cold fusion and the Ecat with english subtitles.
> I think this first aired in the fall of 2012. Translation by Hampus Ericsson.
>
> Essen and Kullander appear and say they are sti
n't prove
anything. There's a strong correlation between the number of
firefighters and the size of town fires. Thankfully no one is
suggesting that we should get rid of the fire fighters so that we can
reduce the town fires.
Craig
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2I0QN-FYkpw
Craig
On 01/31/2013 03:50 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 8:54, Edmund Storms wrote:
>
>>> Take the mortgage melt down in 2008 and following, do you think any
>>> intelligence was used by the financial industry. Yet these peo
On 01/30/2013 05:57 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Craig mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> The danger is in the inefficiency. Electric cars and wind energy,
> is not
> present in the numbers you envision, because they are more expensive
> than
own lives, and enriches
them more. The moral solution is free of violence and the threat of
violence that governments impose when trying to change the structure of
society for some external reason. Such a change may be necessary, but
only if the Earth were definitely being threatened.
Craig
first asteroid samples
back in the 2020s.
Craig
What book? How was
it eaten? Which person are you referring to?
Craig
On 01/12/2013 11:09 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
> Things were going well. Amazon was selling my books. I was talking
> on the radio. Some other were helping to get rid of nasty typos I
> was promoting cold fus
is Universe, you simply have no reference by which you could tie such
an event to another Universe.
Craig
erefore, to
be false?
Craig
On 01/01/2013 02:58 PM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
> Aha, but there is this concept of "Preponderance of Evidence". While
> this is a legal concept, we can nevertheless apply its principles in
> our discussion.
>
> Basically, what Preponderance of Evid
se you can't find anything wrong with it. I can write a
book about life on Pluto, and you won't be able to prove it wrong.
Craig
On 01/01/2013 01:38 AM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
>
> As to the issue of "unverfiiable source". You need to define what you
> mean by unverifiable. How does one go about verifying a history book
> like the Bible?
You can't... and that's the point.
Craig
is no difference between something that is
'everything' and something that is 'nothing'. Which characteristics
would be different? There can't be a difference when there are no
identifiable characteristics.
Craig
On 12/27/2012 11:12 PM, Jojo Jaro wrote:
> OK, since you asked. Don't say I am trolling.
>
>
> There is reason to believe that fallen angels are trying to breed with
> humans to create a hybrid race. The Bible called these hybrids
> Nephilims. They were universal during the days of Noah. They int
On 12/26/2012 10:56 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
> At 05:56 PM 12/26/2012, Craig wrote:
>> Isn't it a calculated location? Isn't it the radius from the center
>> of the black hole at which a theoretical object at a great distance
>> would reach the speed of light w
Isn't it a calculated location? Isn't it the radius from the center of
the black hole at which a theoretical object at a great distance would
reach the speed of light when falling into the black hole from its gravity?
Craig
On 12/26/2012 04:57 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
> I read all
scale. Maybe in your
local state or country, but not worldwide. There is too much money in
oil. If cold fusion becomes wildly successful, then this will solve your
problem, but it won't then be a political solution; it will be a market
solution. You won't even be able to point to government subsidies as the
reason for success.
Craig
On 12/16/2012 09:58 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> They sure look correlated to me.
>
> - Jed
>
The original poster at MFM clarified this when he said that the
amplitude of T_GlassOut had changed. It wasn't the cycle that was no
longer correlated, but rather the amplitude was much different.
Craig
t the temperature of the core is significantly
hotter also be an indication that they are actually seeing excess heat?
(isn't that T Mica) This makes T Glass In look suspicious, rather than
the T Glass Out measurement.
Craig
On 12/14/2012 05:17 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
> The difference between T_Mica and T_GlassIn seems to be about 5
> degrees larger than it was during calibration. I put the details in
> the progress blog comments.
>
> Jeff
>
Where do you see T_Mica for the calibration runs?
Craig
>
> Jeff
>
I don't think that's relevant for this issue. The temperature of the
inside of the glass appears to be the same in both the calibration runs
and this current test, for the same power level applied. This implies
that the extra temperature on the outside of the glass is some sort of
artefact.
Craig
time in the day, we challenge you to spot it.
> *
>
> Did anyone ever find it?
>
Is it something as simple as labelling the Power (Red) variable as (bar)
for pressure, instead of (W) for watts?
Craig
Correction! I didn't realize that they had upped the power to 54 watts.
Craig
On 12/14/2012 03:14 PM, Craig wrote:
> I'm not seeing the problem. The highest temperature in the calibration
> runs for T-GlassIn, at this power level, was about 125C. During this
> live run, the
I'm not seeing the problem. The highest temperature in the calibration
runs for T-GlassIn, at this power level, was about 125C. During this
live run, the temperature appears to be about 5 C above that.
Craig
On 12/14/2012 03:00 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Harry Veeder mailto:hveeder...@g
the orbit of the Earth had changed then again, the shadow would have
moved.
Craig
ter the words they so dreaded, after Pons and Fleishmann have
been shown to be correct?
Craig
It may also be that if Celani has found a method which is 100%
reproducible, then it is because his method creates a more stable
reaction. Otherwise it probably wouldn't be 100% reproducible if it was
as erratic as other experiments.
Craig
On 12/13/2012 10:14 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
pg
I can't pull up that exact graph, but the fluctuations are similar in
the lower P_Xs Low parameter.
Craig
On 12/13/2012 10:02 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I went to HUGentView and pulled up a graph with these parameters:
>
> From: 12/12/2012 09:06:31 to 12/13/2012 09:06:31 Type: histo
They shut the power off from around 4:30 am EST until around 5:45am EST.
Does anyone know why?
Craig
The breathing correlates with T_Mica very well. Isn't this the
temperature of the wire? If so, then it's actually power that is
oscillating. I was thinking it might be something in the room environment.
Craig
On 12/12/2012 09:49 PM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
> On 2012-12-13 03:29
shape, and
with each wave lasting about an hour. I also see that the wave appears
to be tapering with the lows becoming higher and the heights become
lower. There also seems to be a correlation with T_Ambient, but why?
Very strange.
Craig
On 12/12/2012 09:05 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On
The have 48 watts of input power now and are getting out 52 - 54 watts
on their conservative estimate. Their optimistic estimate shows them at
around 67 - 70 watts out.
Craig
On 12/12/2012 04:45 PM, Craig wrote:
> You can follow this latest replication live here:
>
> http://data.hugn
You can follow this latest replication live here:
http://data.hugnetlab.com/
Click on 'View' for Celani Cell #2 and you can follow the live graph.
If you have Google+, you can join a live hangout with them and talk to
them in real time. The hangout is 'MFMP'.
Craig
Mills:
"We will announce some substantial developments at some point."
Craig
Original Message
Subject:Re: [SocietyforClassicalPhysics] End of Year
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:07:46 -0500
From: Randell Mills
Reply-To: societyforclassicalphys...@yahoo
rum is for discussion of Bitcoin related
activity. You were probably banned for not staying on topic.
Craig
65-mars-rover-curiosity-discovery-mystery.html
Craig
y a local
enthusiast. It's powered by internal combustion.
What else could it be?
Craig
On 11/14/2012 09:01 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
>
> The ufo is so fast it is invisible to the naked eye but can be
> observed by slowing film -- both by original claimant and by the news
> a
I think it's a small RC jet at a distance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvqhLawLXNE
Craig
On 11/12/2012 02:52 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Don't say "Bugs":
>
> http://kdvr.com/2012/11/08/mile-high-city-mystery-ufo-sightings-in-sky-over-denver/
>
> They n
They come in an assortment of different colours. Invisible white, see-through
yellow and transparent blue.
I wish they would pay more attention to the elephant in the room - the fact
that there is still no publicly available validation by a credible third party.
Sent from my iPhone
On 02/11/20
. This demonstrates competence and is not a
trait in con artists. It's one of the more credible parts of his
personality.
Craig
Atomic Hydrogen with potassium as a catalyst? Doesn't this sound an
awful lot like Mill's work in the 90s?
Craig
On 10/22/2012 08:14 AM, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
It appears that the pdf documents with redacted names wasn't the only
one which sort of "leaked
Test Results:
Defkalion demonstrated > 1 COP of accumulated total energy output
divided by accumulated total energy input (exact total COP will be
provided in final report)
Defkalion demonstrated control of reaction (start, stop, increase, decrease)
Defkalion demonstrated a reaction output grea
My sentiments exactly. It's nearly the two year anniversary of the first Bologna demonstration and still there is zero in the way of third-party verification of the power claims.
Original Message
Subject: [Vo]:How long?
From: Jeff Berkowitz
Date: Thu, October
I don't like to bring up fringe interests like this, but I saw this
video a couple of days ago, and find it totally fascinating. Whoever
made these crop circles are surely brilliant. I can't imagine who would
do this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkykJisYiVI
Craig
s lost during a
year, then no tax is owed. The wealthiest Americans will frequently lose
wealth during bad years, and pay no income tax. This is correct and
expected.
Buffet does not pay lower taxes. Rather, his tax rate cannot be compared
to other forms of income in an honest fashion.
Craig
"If claim of Rossi are right, the power density per gram of powder is
awesome 596.85 W/g ( (14337-2400)/20 )"
This is correct. I neglected to subtract out the input power.
Craig
On 10/12/2012 01:21 PM, Craig Haynie wrote:
> If average power over 228 hours is 14.337 KW, and the to
If average power over 228 hours is 14.337 KW, and the total charge is 20
g, then shouldn't the power density be:
14337 / 20 = 716 watts/gm = 716 kw / kg
Craig
On 10/12/2012 01:15 PM, Arnaud Kodeck wrote:
> Why Rossi is taking energy produced per weight as a power density ? In the
>
Awesome! He ran it for 228 hours.
Unless he's deluded or lying, he's got it.
Craig
On 10/12/2012 12:36 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/10/leonardo-corp-releases-new-hot-cat-report/
>
ats and violence (Socialism); the other is through
voluntary cooperation (Capitalism). The answers are black and white.
Craig
ess and the
resulting solutions for complex products and services will no longer be
efficient in that they will no longer provide the solution for the
consumer that reflects the least amount of labor for that solution.
Craig
On 10/09/2012 11:18 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
> Jarold, no, it is not
ity cannot be
derived through reason alone. I just disagree...
http://craighaynie.iprx.com/files/4313/4270/2993/TheGenesisImperative.pdf
Craig
and do not threaten violence against them to achieve
desired social and political goals, then the resulting economic system
is capitalism.
Craig
t the same power radiated, penetrating known RF shielding devices, and
accelerating plant growth exposed to the by-product energy of the RF
transmissions."
*http://tinyurl.com/8htrubb
Craig
*
Well, nothing is overunity, not even cold fusion, but there are a lot of
places which could use cheap lighting and air conditioning.
Craig
On 09/22/2012 09:30 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> No, from the article:
> " However, while MIT's diode puts out more than twice as much energy
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-03/09/230-percent-efficient-leds
Craig
On 09/19/2012 11:44 AM, Robert Dorr wrote:
>
>
> Craig,
>
> I noticed several times in the cat patent, they mention "invisible
> light". That's interesting, possibly an invalid patent, or possibly,
> one could patent one, using "visible light".
>
&
intellectual
property, whereas original, creative, labor intensive, design, is denied.
Craig
5 kwh & 23.72 kwh.
Craig
On 09/14/2012 10:47 AM, Craig Haynie wrote:
> Have I been asleep? I did a search on my archive here, but couldn't find
> any mention of Bianchini's test, performed in July.
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/105322688/Penon4-1
>
> In it, he d
h of input electricity.
That's a COP over 50. Am I misreading this?
Craig
201 - 300 of 603 matches
Mail list logo