On 4/23/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry (wishing he had a detachable penis)
Hell no, you'd put it down somewhere and lose it.
On 4/22/07, thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
Enjoy you(r) rapturous stay in the
NeoCon wing of the Matrix
Kokopelli rules ;-)
What does that mean?
The trickster rules:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kokopelli
Terry (wishing he had a detachable penis)
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
Well, it is difficult to ignore Dr. Brenda, PhD's credentials, and the
fact that she is and has worked in the field of climate science.
Furthermore Dr. Brenda said the mass
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
Well, it is difficult to ignore Dr. Brenda, PhD's credentials, and the
fact that she is and has worked in the field of climate science.
Furthermore Dr.
Howdy Vorts,
As the world turns, the rant goes on and the stomach turns. People are not
destroying the planet.. maybe themselves individually and in collective
groups.. but not the planet.. that's coming, but by design and not by human
decree or PHD.
Richard
One sided propaganda, she was
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Howdy Vorts,
As the world turns, the rant goes on and the stomach turns. People are
not destroying the planet.. maybe themselves individually and in
collective groups.. but not the planet.. that's coming, but by design
and not by human decree or PHD.
Richard
One sided
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
No doubt, but Dr. Brenda said nearly all climate scientists now agree
with the recent overwhelming data that clearly indicates
- Original Message -
From: Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.
There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Paul Lowrance wrote:
There are scientists who disagree with Dr. Brenda,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU
No doubt, but Dr. Brenda said nearly all climate scientists now agree
with the recent overwhelming data
Kyle R. Mcallister wrote:
[snip
Should we try to cut emissions of bad gases? Sure, why not, but not at
the detriment of the basis of our society, that is, the working class.
Maybe anyone in an environmentalist organization should be given a
severe tax increase to support a changeover to
One warped comment to add into the bogosity mix:
People are not destroying the planet.. maybe
themselves
individually and in collective groups.. but not the
planet..
I agree with this part of Richard's summation, but he
may be viewing the situation in the context of a
narrow religious
attraction, centrifugal force and photon pressure, comments/criticisms
welcome on this.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Paul Lowrance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually
]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.
Kyle R. Mcallister wrote:
[snip
Should we try to cut emissions of bad gases? Sure, why not, but not at
the detriment of the basis of our society, that is, the working class.
Maybe anyone in an environmentalist organization should be given
: Saturday, April 21, 2007 12:08:54 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.
Indeed Paul, whether you and Dr Brenda and the IPCC http://www.ipcc.ch/are
right is irrelevant. The real question is, can humanity remediate global
warming, and how, we should
Paul Lowrance wrote:
I'm surprised nobody at Vo picked up on climate scientist Brenda
Ekwurzel, PhD. guest on Coast To Coast AM show last Saturday --
One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
warming to talk about anything else. She ignored the issue of the
-Earth line a unit parasol area
would be most efficient?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based.
Paul Lowrance wrote:
I'm
thomas malloy wrote:
One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused
warming to talk about anything else. She ignored the issue of the Sun's
increased irradiance.
Actually I recall Dr. Brenda did indeed address this.
Also the observation that temperature
Michel Jullian wrote:
It seems to me that whatever the causes of GW, if we want a remedy we will have
to take care of it.
Jed mentioned orbiting parasols once, I then understood he was talking about Earth orbits so I
You could use either the Cook Drive or the E M Drive to hold the parasol
I'm surprised nobody at Vo picked up on climate scientist Brenda Ekwurzel, PhD.
guest on Coast To Coast AM show last Saturday --
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2007/04/14.html
Leading climate science researcher Brenda Ekwurzel, PhD. announced the just
recent overwhelming evidence from
19 matches
Mail list logo
