why the hydrogen
> is squeezed but the surrounding atoms are not pushed back in an equal and
> opposite manner.
>
> Are we to believe that the Casimir force acts in only one direction and in
> violation to Newton's laws?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message---
pposite manner.
>
> Are we to believe that the Casimir force acts in only one direction and in
> violation to Newton's laws?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roarty, Francis X
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Fri, Jan 31, 2014 12:55 pm
> Subjec
we to believe that the Casimir force acts in only one direction
and in violation to Newton's laws?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Jan 31, 2014 12:55 pm
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR
Also if each Ni nucleus in the sea
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Roarty, Francis X
To: vortex-l
Sent: Fri, Jan 31, 2014 12:55 pm
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR
Also ifeach Ni nucleus in the sea of Ni would have to experience the role of
the so called catalyst it would be as part of “casimir” group not individ
.
Fran
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR
Fran, do you realize how strange this explanation sounds? The H has
to climb over a Coulomb barrier having a charge
sions as to the originating
>> source of the energy.. I am not too fond of the "neutral atoms" he is
>> suggesting but I think he has a better handle than most on what is setting
>> the stage.
>>
>> Fran
>>
>> *From:* Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@i
ms
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR
Fran, do you realize how strange this explanation sounds? The H has to climb
over a Coulomb barrier having a charge of 28. We know how hard getting over a
change of 1 is, so how is this barrier overcome so easily? Second, each Ni
nucleus in the sea of Ni
ource of the energy.. I am not too fond of the "neutral atoms" he is
> suggesting but I think he has a better handle than most on what is setting
> the stage.
>
> Fran
>
> *From:* Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 31, 2014 12:06
First of all, the diagram is preposterous on the surface. He claims "1 MJ"
in a beta reaction. Since one J = 6E12 MeV, the "1 MJ" would be 6E18 MeV
of energy in the beta - preposterous.
But, lets presume it is a typo and what he meant to say was 1 MeV instead
of 1 MJ in the beta. Of course, bet
suggesting but I think he has a better handle than most on what is
setting the stage.
Fran
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:stor...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Edmund Storms
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR
Fran, do you realize h
Fran, do you realize how strange this explanation sounds? The H has to
climb over a Coulomb barrier having a charge of 28. We know how hard
getting over a change of 1 is, so how is this barrier overcome so
easily? Second, each Ni nucleus in the sea of Ni would have to
experience the role of
Just saw this:
http://ecatsuomi.wordpress.com/2014/01/30/arto-lauri-i-will-take-on-how-the-e-cat-works/
pix http://ecatsuomi.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/arto_lauri_proposal1.png
I think Arto is very close if not exactly on target with this theory for the
ecat.. IMHO he defines the fractional
12 matches
Mail list logo
