*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--
Rossi has already done that. He reported that last year his coworkers
were able to build one of his devices and get excess heat simply on his
instructions, without him being in the room (or even being on the same
continent
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi needs to explain how to build the thing or he's not getting a patent.
No, he only needs to explain how to replicate it. A patent does not have to
explain how something works. It only has to allow a person having ordinary
skill in the art
The key to the Rossi effect is the 5 micron powder and how to produce the
proper sized nanowire on those particles. Unless this process is defined,
the Rossi reactor will not work.
Note that Rossi never ever mentions the micro-powder and any details of how
to produce it... except that a 98 year
Rossi's behavior toward patent law is most curious. He obviously doesn't
really want a patent because to get one that's enforceable/valid he would
have to meet the fundamental criteria of disclosure.
So I don't know what he thinks he's up to with these patent applications.
On Sun, May 11, 2014
-
From: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, May 11, 2014 11:54 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--
Rossi's behavior toward patent law is most curious. He obviously doesn't
really want a patent because to get one that's enforceable/valid
Rossi has already done that. He reported that last year his coworkers were
able to build one of his devices and get excess heat simply on his
instructions, without him being in the room (or even being on the same
continent).
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
- Original Message -
From: Kevin O'Malley
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--
Rossi has already done that. He reported that last year his coworkers were
able to build one of his devices and get excess heat
His co worker. He needs to do that to the patent analyzer.
2014-05-11 18:13 GMT-03:00 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com:
[image: Boxbe] https://www.boxbe.com/overview This message is eligible
for Automatic Cleanup! (kevmol...@gmail.com) Add cleanup
For patents, protection starts on day 1. I really don't know what Rossi can
do.
2014-05-11 18:43 GMT-03:00 Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com:
[image: Boxbe] https://www.boxbe.com/overview This message is eligible
for Automatic Cleanup! (frobertc...@hotmail.com) Add cleanup
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--
For patents, protection starts on day 1. I really don't know what Rossi can
do.
2014-05-11 18:43 GMT-03:00 Bob Cook frobertc
vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Sunday, May 11, 2014 2:50 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--
For patents, protection starts on day 1. I really don't know what Rossi
can do.
2014-05-11 18:43 GMT-03:00 Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com:
[image: Boxbe] https://www.boxbe.com
, May 11, 2014 2:50 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--
For patents, protection starts on day 1. I really don't know what Rossi
can do.
2014-05-11 18:43 GMT-03:00 Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com:
[image: Boxbe] https://www.boxbe.com/overview This message
I was thinking about this. Since this patent application is worthless,
Rossi could well apply again without any loss of prior art, since he didn't
establish any clear to begin with.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Rossi needs to explain how to build the thing or he's not getting a patent.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
When this report is published it will probably be greeted with a yawn.
Rossi needs to demo his plant to the patent office and then he'd get his
When this report is published it will probably be greeted with a yawn.
Rossi needs to demo his plant to the patent office and then he'd get his
patent approved. It would be at that point that LENR breaks out.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Yesterday
Yesterday Rossi (on his reader blog) indicated that the third party tests
would not be reported before June.
Vortexers have at least another month to speculate on the mechanism of the Ni-H
Rossi Effect. However it may be quite bit longer, depending upon patent
disclosure strategy. What are
FUTURE?
I'd like to throw in a couple of general comments on the current trend of
this Forum and LENR in general (Just as a cheerleader, since I am totally
incapable of contributing or even understanding the technical details).
Despite no real evidence of any imminent breakthrough, still, we
Whoops, accidentally interrupted my above message. To conclude:
That unraveling will, of course, take some great deal more effort, as
well as probably a great deal of time and money, even though we all hope(d)
that it could be carried off by the 'underground'. Lennart Thomas seems
to have a
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/47
Focus: Why We Can’t Remember the Future
In absolute certainty, LENR exists in the future; it is predestined because
it will eventually be discovered just like any major operating principle of
the universe must ultimately be. But how can we remember how
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0W67qnktk_8#t=947
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/47
Focus: Why We Can’t Remember the Future
In absolute certainty, LENR exists in the future; it is predestined
because it will
Sorry, I just couldn't resist, Axil.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:45 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0W67qnktk_8#t=947
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/47
Focus: Why We Can’t
James--
Did you forget what you couldn't resist because the resistance was too great
and it didn't happen.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: James Bowery
To: vortex-l
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--
Sorry, I just
.
Bob
- Original Message -
*From:* James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Friday, May 02, 2014 6:47 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--
Sorry, I just couldn't resist, Axil.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 8:45 PM, James Bowery
23 matches
Mail list logo
