Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-27 Thread Axil Axil
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 2:11 AM, wrote: > In reply to Eric Walker's message of Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:40:15 -0700: > Hi, > [snip] > > - In 3He, which is stable, electrostatic repulsion is felt between two > > nucleons, and the strong interaction is felt equally between all > nucleons. > >In

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-27 Thread Axil Axil
http://www.physlink.com/education/askexperts/ae565.cfm The strong force attracts protons to protons or neutrons to neutrons. In the case of protons to protons, the strong force loses strength after the distance and succumbs to the electromagnetic force which pushes the protons apart. In this case

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-27 Thread Eric Walker
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > Protons and neutrons are bound by the strong nuclear force, which is > mediated by gluons and described by the theory of quantum chromodynamics > (QCD). Unlike photons, which mediate the electromagnetic force, gluons can > interact with each oth

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-27 Thread Axil Axil
*“Within a nucleon there are uncounted sea quarks and only three tiny valence quarks, and these valence quarks are responsible for the residual strong interaction with other nucleons. Why are there countless sea quarks and exactly three valence quarks left over, above and beyond them? It feels a

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-27 Thread Harry Veeder
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > > > A diproton is something to think about. It gives rise to or is indirectly > related to the following novice questions: > > In 3He, which is stable, electrostatic repulsion is felt between two > nucleons, and the strong interaction is felt

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-27 Thread mixent
In reply to Joseph S. Barrera III's message of Fri, 26 Apr 2013 23:21:56 -0700: Hi, [snip] >On 4/26/2013 11:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: > > > IMO (and I emphasize opinion), there is no nuclear force between like >signed > > nucleons. I.e. protons do not attract one another, nor do neutrons.

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-26 Thread Axil Axil
In many superconductors, the attractive interaction between electrons (necessary for pairing) is brought about indirectly by the interaction between the electrons and the vibrating crystal lattice (the phonons). The same should be true for protons pairs. If Diprotons exist, the amazing conclusion

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-26 Thread Joseph S. Barrera III
On 4/26/2013 11:11 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: > IMO (and I emphasize opinion), there is no nuclear force between like signed > nucleons. I.e. protons do not attract one another, nor do neutrons. Your opinion is wrong. In fact the term nucleon stems from the observation that neutrons and pr

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-26 Thread mixent
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:40:15 -0700: Hi, [snip] > - In 3He, which is stable, electrostatic repulsion is felt between two > nucleons, and the strong interaction is felt equally between all nucleons. >In deuterium, which is stable, there is no electrostatic r

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-26 Thread Eric Walker
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Harry Veeder wrote: A few experiments conducted before this showed > ambiguous evidence: two protons emerged from the decay but one > couldn’t tell that the protons had not been thrown out one at a time > or both at the same time randomly from the whole Ne-18 or

Re: [Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-26 Thread Harry Veeder
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Harry Veeder wrote: > Possible laboratory evidence of diprotons > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diproton#Helium-2_.28diproton.29 > > It is interesting that one of the experiments mentioned in the above > link used fluorine and a recent post on Passerini's blog sug

[Vo]:evidence of diprotons

2013-04-25 Thread Harry Veeder
Possible laboratory evidence of diprotons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diproton#Helium-2_.28diproton.29 It is interesting that one of the experiments mentioned in the above link used fluorine and a recent post on Passerini's blog suggests SPAWAR would have got better results with fluorine instea