2011/10/16 Terry Blanton :
> They must be reading our posts where we express concerns about AR's
> demonstration and potential disaster.
>
Indeed, I would not be surprised, if Vortex was the primary source for
Defkalion's technical knowledge. This is not the first time when I get
weird déjà vu when
Later, in the same thread:
Defkalion GT
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:30 am
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:56 am
Posts: 153
spat wrote:
Will Defkalion disclose the theory?
Defkalion scope and objective is to bring to the market safe, reliable
and stable Hyperion products, handling all us
Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Jouni Valkonen wrote:
>>
>> Rossi talked on his own technology. not about Defkalion's,
>> because he did not have any intimate knowledge what
>> was doing.
>
> He was there at the press conference where they
> said that they had been working closely with him for a year.
Th
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
> Rossi talked on his own technology. not about Defkalion's, because he did
> not have any intimate knowledge what Defkalion was doing.
He was there at the press conference where they said that they had been
working closely with him for a year. They said they had the tech
> Jouni Valkonen wrote:
>> From Rossi and Stremmenos.
>
Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I do not believe Rossi's statements about this for two reasons, which I
> think are compelling:
> 1. After he said this the first time, he soon retracted. He said that his
> dispute is about business and not technology.
Rich, you are so naive. Do you honestly think that a technology of
this type could come this close to commercialization and not be within
the awareness of DARPA? Why do you think that AR, et.al. continuously
explain that their rights exclude military applications?
LENR has been suppressed until
Anyone agree that immediate disclosure of any nuclear reaction
breakthroughs has to be detailed and worldwide, if the possible
hazards of weapons applications are to be publicly and thoroughly
assessed for the safety and good of all?
Even if no explosions may be possible, we also have to consider
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
> >> And you really believe what Defkalion representatives says? There is
> nothing for Dekalion, but it coulisse. There are no personals employed and
> they do not have infrastructure and research and they do not posses any
> money.
> >
> > Where did you get this informati
Being nice is the usual behavior of any company with decent public
relations.
2011/10/15
> In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:30:34 -0300:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >Who said they need the catalyst?
>
> I think the fact that they are still being nice to Rossi implies that they
> n
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:30:34 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
>Who said they need the catalyst?
I think the fact that they are still being nice to Rossi implies that they need
something.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
Who said they need the catalyst?
2011/10/15
> In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:15:43 -0300:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >That's what I understand by reading this... "Even though, we intend to
> >support papers with results supported by the measurements from *new
> >instruments **w
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:15:43 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
>That's what I understand by reading this... "Even though, we intend to
>support papers with results supported by the measurements from *new
>instruments **we had to develop in order to control* and further develop t
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:12:40 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
>According to Rossi, Nickel transmutes to Copper and it decays to Nickel
>again by beta decay, so there is neutrino emission.
This assumes that Rossi et al actually do know which reactions are taking place.
>
>2011
That's what I understand by reading this... "Even though, we intend to
support papers with results supported by the measurements from *new
instruments **we had to develop in order to control* and further develop the
technologies embedded in our products"
2011/10/15
> In reply to Daniel Rocha's
According to Rossi, Nickel transmutes to Copper and it decays to Nickel
again by beta decay, so there is neutrino emission.
2011/10/15
> In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:37:53 -0300:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >It is extremely easy to prove within a few seconds that any of these
lauantai, 15. lokakuuta 2011 Jed Rothwell kirjoitti:
> Jouni Valkonen wrote:
>
>>
>> And you really believe what Defkalion representatives says? There is
nothing for Dekalion, but it coulisse. There are no personals employed and
they do not have infrastructure and research and they do not posses
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:16:30 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
>The best part here it is that they indeed confirm that Rossi is lying about
>they not having the necessary know-how to make the core WOW!
>
>2011/10/15 Terry Blanton
>
>> http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/v
In reply to Daniel Rocha's message of Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:37:53 -0300:
Hi,
[snip]
>It is extremely easy to prove within a few seconds that any of these devices
>work, without any kind of calorimetry, water heat or steam. Take it to the
>neutrino detector in Gran Sasso, Italy. The neutrino emission
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
> And you really believe what Defkalion representatives says? There is
> nothing for Dekalion, but it coulisse. There are no personals employed and
> they do not have infrastructure and research and they do not posses any
> money.
Where did you get this information?
- Je
It is extremely easy to prove within a few seconds that any of these devices
work, without any kind of calorimetry, water heat or steam. Take it to the
neutrino detector in Gran Sasso, Italy. The neutrino emission of Hyperion
and Ecats must be extremely high, so there will be certainly a strong sig
Mr. Murray sez:
> Defkalion spokesman seems defensive, offering hot air...
"Defensive"? "Hot air"?
Rich, you did read the original author's, Gaby de Wilde's, statement, didn't
you? Seems to me that DGT had every right to take exception to Gaby's brief
statement claiming that LENR is a field tha
I would add to that, that Defkalion did not even see a private demonstration
with Rossi, expect those made with Stremmenos. That is because price tag for
private demonstration is if I recall $45M. This much cash Rossi wants to see
before he allows private demonstration. This is to make sure that hi
Daniel Rocha wrote:
> The best part here it is that they indeed confirm
> that Rossi is lying about they not having the
> necessary know-how to make the core WOW!
And you really believe what Defkalion representatives says? There is nothing
for Dekalion, but it coulisse. There are no personals
I think they will stick with their November 2011 date.
T
DGT sez:
...
> Even though, we intend to support papers with results supported by
> the measurements from new instruments we had to develop in order to
> control and further develop the technologies embedded in our products,
> in peer-reviewed magazines and during the first LENR Industrialization
Defkalion spokesman seems defensive, offering hot air...
If true, the anomalies must be made available to the world
immediately, as any breakthrough in nuclear physics is a world
security issue...
The best part here it is that they indeed confirm that Rossi is lying about
they not having the necessary know-how to make the core WOW!
2011/10/15 Terry Blanton
> http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3407#p3407
>
>
>
> Defkalion GT
> Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:04 am
>
> J
27 matches
Mail list logo
