agnetic field and a
nucleus during operation of nuclear magnetic resonant machines used for
medical imaging?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Th
The barrier is still there. Its like a rabbit trying to get over you garden
fence. The barrier stops it. You just step over it because the length of your
step exceeds that of the barrier. Over you go, no thump. The ONLY way the
Coulomb barrier can be crossed without emitting radiation,the t
situation an
> electric field is generated that can add energy to charged particles. This
> is pure speculation seeking evidence.
>
> Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Cook
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 2:55 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Ba
, Mar 25, 2014 3:05 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
No! I did not say this. I am speaking about the magnetic component of the
strong nuclear force the spin orbit force. It is NOT electromagnetic, It does
not attract metal. It flips nucleons. I only used the electromagnetic force
ce may have
been utilized to manipulate the B fields as suggested above. Maybe someone
could answer this question?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Bob
Now I
particles. This is pure speculation
seeking evidence.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 2:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Dave-
The note from Frank: "The net effect is a growing field and energy release that
work tog
Message-
From: Bob Cook
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 2:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Dave-
The note from Frank: "The net effect is a growing field and energy release that
work together." The growing field involves a larger volume and coupling for
al Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Bob,
I do not understand your question. I still believe that a large magnetic
field is interacting with the individual small NAE in a m
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Frank--
You noted:
>>>The magnetic component of the strong nuclear force is called the spin orbit
>>>force. It is never considered by the hot fusion people.<<<
Why is it ignored?
Bob
- Original Message -
-
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.1593.pdf
Experimental study of the two-body spin-orbit force
This field is on the cutting edge of research.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:52
tex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
From: David Roberson
We hear so much chatter about the Coulomb barrier and how difficult it is to
overcome for fusion events to occur. Perhaps we should consider it as an
electromag
, the total energy is too small to
accurately measure.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 1:58 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Dave--
Is your concept of coherence changing? Frank is providing a cause for expanded
scope (size
force is called the spin
> orbit force. It is never considered by the hot fusion people.<<<
>
> Why is it ignored?
>
> Bob
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* fznidar...@aol.com
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:37 AM
> *Sub
some significance.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: fznidarsic
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 12:37 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Thats a common mistake. We cannot reduce the Coulomb barrier. The static
force fields are conserved and cannot be reduced in
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
I understand that a steady magnetic field can not add energy to a charged
particle. It can redirect the velocity vector of
com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Thats a common mistake. We cannot reduce the Coulomb barrier. The static
force fields are conserved and cannot be reduced in a two body problem. The
static force field can, however, be bypassed by a for
Dave--
You're preaching to the choir.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 8:39 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
We hear so much chatter about the Coulomb barrier and how difficult it is to
overcome
-Original Message-
From: fznidarsic
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 12:37 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier
Thats a common mistake. We cannot reduce the Coulomb barrier. The static
force fields are conserved and cannot be reduced in a two body problem. The
static
Thats a common mistake. We cannot reduce the Coulomb barrier. The static
force fields are conserved and cannot be reduced in a two body problem. The
static force field can, however, be bypassed by a force with longer range.
The magnetic component of the strong nuclear force is called the spin
From: David Roberson
We hear so much chatter about the Coulomb barrier and how difficult it is to
overcome for fusion events to occur. Perhaps we should consider it as an
electromagnetic barrier instead. There is plenty of reason to suspect that
a magnetic component of force is active along
electromagnetic moat
Harry
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:39 AM, David Roberson wrote:
> We hear so much chatter about the Coulomb barrier and how difficult it is
> to overcome for fusion events to occur. Perhaps we should consider it as
> an electromagnetic barrier instead. There is plenty of
Some in this list believe that spin coupling has a large impact upon the rate
of LENR activity and there may well be other magnetic interactions associated
with nano particles and their large local magnetic fields. I tend to think
that these couplings are a key concept that needs to be unders
22 matches
Mail list logo
