Cc: 'vortex-l@eskimo.com'
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nanomagnetism Theory
Hi Terry,
I agree oscillon activity could explain the anomalous heat in the
Rossi
Reactor, and helps to explain why an external exciter of certain frequencies
is necessary but
I don't think this is fast enough for
Hi Terry,
I agree oscillon activity could explain the anomalous heat in the
Rossi
Reactor, and helps to explain why an external exciter of certain frequencies
is necessary but
I don't think this is fast enough for pair separation like the recent
article using SQUIDS to create the equivalen
Rossi is not the only show in town. There is good promise that there will
be a hand full of other LENR events that will hold our interest over the
winter. Rossi is just one of many interesting LENR players that are in the
offing. First off, I am interested in what Brian Ahern of Ames National
Lab
Given that REAL is single, self-interactive, fractal and infinite in every
possible way, then it is a reasonable fantasy to guess that something like
"adjacent" "nearby" realms of yet undiscovered energetic things exist, able
to feed tiny to huge to infinite amounts of energy and momentum into our
Examining the web's limited oscillon information, it would appear that it
is important that the powder not be bound to the side of the reactor as
conjectured by others. The powder must remain free and could be located in
the center of the reactor as stated on the ecat.com web site.
In defense o
That's kinda what I have been saying, that magnetism is not a conserved
property of the universe. I, however, correctly identified the nuclear
magnetic or nuclear spin orbit force and the actor.
Frank Znidarsic
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875389211006092
Oscillon or soliton? Not sure which. The difference can be subtle.
Neither is gainful on its own, but that is not the end-of-story. A good
analogy is the 'rogue wave' on the ocean (which is a rare massive energy
anomaly) but is not evidence of net gain.
The net gain would then need to come
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Unlike the earlier situation – where Henri demonstrated that the new kind of
> radiation did not depend on an “external source” of energy (but came
> spontaneously from within the metal) the source of energy in
> Nanomagnetism/Energy Locali
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Terry Blanton
>
> ** **
>
> Imagine yourself in Paris around the turn of the century. You would have
> been at a similar “loss for words.” But the establishment found a way to
> save face, as always.
>
> ** **
>
> Wait a minu
From: Terry Blanton
"Apparently, energy localization at the nano-scale circumvents the 2nd Law
of Thermodynamics."
Blasphemy!
Not really "blasphemy" - closer to "semantics-in-action". If Ahern is
correct, and many on Vortex will appreciate that he builds on Dirac
(Hotson's version) for
Nice piccy of an oscillon on this page:
http://www.mech.northwestern.edu/web/people/faculty/umbanhowar/
T
Examining the web's limited oscillon information, it would appear that it
is important that the powder not be bound to the side of the reactor as
conjectured by others. The powder must remain free and could be located in
the center of the reactor as stated on the ecat.com web site.
Also, if oscil
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> This theory, or a version of it, could be behind more than Rossi and LENR,
> in general ...
>
> http://citi5.org/launch/?p=1826
>
> Note sure what the Citi5 group is ... other than opportunists
>
>
They appear to be non-profit opportunists.
*"Apparently, energy localization at the nano-scale circumvents the 2nd Law
of Thermodynamics."*
*
*
*Blasphemy!*
*
*
*T
*
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> This theory, or a version of it, could be behind more than Rossi and LENR,
> in general ...
>
> http://citi5.org/laun
14 matches
Mail list logo
