I have collected more data in a new run that seems to explain things (see
chart below). Something took place around 1000 seconds and corrected
around where the spike occurred (note that I removed some data from the
first part of Run 1 to line up the curves at the start of the runs). The
most
Excellent work Jack, since this latest graph is starting to look suggestive
for a real comparative thermal anomaly .
Let's hope that this continues, since you are starting to see the thermal
ratcheting effect which seems to be one the most reliable tells for gain
in the Ni-H reaction - and you
Jones,
I don't know if we have a real ratcheting effect or not. I have it running
like a simple thermostat. Turns the electrolysis on at a set temp and off
at a set temp. With this method, you would only see ratcheting if there
was heat after death. The other possibility to see it would be a
From: Jack Cole
I don't know if we have a real ratcheting effect or not. I have it running
like a simple thermostat. Turns the electrolysis on at a set temp and off
at a set temp. With this method, you would only see ratcheting if there was
heat after death.
Yes, that would be the
Jones,
Here is the run overnight with the graphite anode replacing the stainless
steel. That temperature jump about half way through seems intriguing.
I've never seen it do that before. It occurred over 90 seconds.
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/6-15-13.png
Best
In reply to Jack Cole's message of Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:52:25 -0500:
Hi,
At 11350 seconds it suddenly flattens off. The curve after the jump appears to
be a continuation of the curve before 11350 seconds. This gives me the
impression that something changed at about 11350 seconds which was
[mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 3:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:One peril of thermometry
In reply to Jack Cole's message of Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:52:25 -0500:
Hi,
At 11350 seconds it suddenly flattens off. The curve after the jump appears
to be a continuation
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
See this chart:
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/falseahe.jpg
It would be nice to see a control run for comparison.
Eric
Good point Robin.
There could have been accumulating H2/O2 bubble formation that suddenly
recombined (burned) to give the big jump in temperature. Jack has a neat
Android based controller that lets him collect data by cell phone. I think
we will be hearing more on his progress as time goes on.
: Saturday, June 15, 2013 3:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:One peril of thermometry
In reply to Jack Cole's message of Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:52:25 -0500:
Hi,
At 11350 seconds it suddenly flattens off. The curve after the jump appears
to be a continuation of the curve before
Yes, I will do that after I finish running another experiment tonight.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
See this chart:
From: Jack Cole
This produced apparent (but false) excess heating of up to 50% in several of
my experiments. Is this analysis sensible?
Not so sure that this analysis is precise - but apparent gain could be due
to iron as a consumable and must be eliminated. If iron is leaching, then
Thanks Jones. I just ordered one of those anodes. I am also going to
cross check with a graphite anode. I was using standard nickels and a
thoriated tungsten rod all plated with an extra layer of nickel as a
cathode. I also added a small amount of nickel sulfate to the electrolyte
after
13 matches
Mail list logo
