I wrote:
> What is the abstract for the paper AbuTaha, A.F., Cold fusion - the heat
> mechanism. J. Fusion Energy, 1990. 9(3): p. 345.
>
> [TRICK QUESTION. THERE IS NO ABSTRACT LISTED. SHE GOT THE WRONG ONE, FROM
> THE PREVIOUS PAPER]
>
> The abstract for the paper "Cold fusion - the heat
Okay, I added a structured index, with the items labeled. She said she did
not need that, but she also said "That would definitely make it easier for
me to identify the URL associated with each title." It turns out she still
has trouble finding some of the URLs, so I appended them to the title and
As I described in previous threads, I have installed a small version of
ChatGPT at LENR-CANR.org. This copy of ChatGPT only has access to the files
I upload. It is provided by a company called ChatFast (
https://www.chatfast.io/). Unfortunately, the bots this company provides do
not have anywhere
Real, the car accelerates to a greater speed, and the end point is below
the starting point.
On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 19:02, Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSv_IlXmBg
>
> Two cars.
>
> Green low road car arrives first.
>
> Real or Fake.
>
> Please
Frank
The effect is an interesting phenomenon even if the tendency is to overlook
rolling resistance and friction. But the problem for the average observer - the
problem with any metaphor or model for LENR - after all these years, is simple.
No commercial device.
Not just no commercial
Thanks Jones.
To me it is a metaphor for catalysis.
One half of component A drops down the field pressure gradient to the low
road and speeds up.
The other half dawdles along the surface.
They both meet up at B and complete their reaction.
The reaction speed for the low road is therefore much
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brachistochrone_curve
That's rightBut to less "with it " people in some forums it seems a
terrible enigma. :-)
The trouble with the maths is that it kills all vestige of the real world
and prevents one seeing the demo in a different light. For example an
analogue
This similar vid is even a bit more "fake" in terms of expectation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvlmdPLMQM4
The more general phenomenon seems to be called the Brachistochrome Problem
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Brac
Jones
Frank Grimer wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSv_IlXmBg
Two cars.
Green low road car arrives first.
Real or Fake.
Please explain your choice.
On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 07:55, Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
No text
Frank Grimer wrote:
Test of text
Test of text
Reminds me of "The Electric Universe Theory" including the *Safire Project*
.
]:A simpler test
What do you mean by the Earth's relative charge?
Does it have net positive or negative charge relative to deep space?
Harry
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:50 AM Chris Zell
mailto:chrisz...@wetmtv.com>> wrote:
Could there be a way to generate energy by ‘transmitting away’ the e
Using something similar to this method?
>
>
>
> *From:* H LV
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:33 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A simpler test
>
>
>
> Update...
>
> I haven't done any experiments yet, but I have refined my thinkin
Zell wrote:
Could there be a way to generate energy by ‘transmitting away’ the
earth’s relative charge into neutral space? Using something similar to
this method?
*From:*H LV
*Sent:* Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:33 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A simpler test
Update...
Could there be a way to generate energy by ‘transmitting away’ the earth’s
relative charge into neutral space? Using something similar to this method?
From: H LV
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:33 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A simpler test
Update...
I haven't done any
, MSF
> wrote:
> >
> > > Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the
> acquisition and preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this
> test. The double parabola test you initially proposed would not have proved
> or disproved cooling radiation. The d
ay, January 24th, 2022 at 9:06 PM, MSF
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the
> > > acquisition and preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this
> > > test. The double parabola test you initially prop
inal Message ‐‐‐
>
> On Monday, January 24th, 2022 at 9:06 PM, MSF
> wrote:
>
> > Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the acquisition
> > and preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this test. The
> > double parabola test you initially propos
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 4:06 PM MSF wrote:
>
> Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the acquisition
> and preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this test. The double
> parabola test you initially proposed would not have proved or disprove
about this test. The double
> parabola test you initially proposed would not have proved or disproved
> cooling radiation. The dry ice at the focus would have been a radiative heat
> sink and would have lowered the temperature at the other focus. At least
> that's my opinion of it.
&g
Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the acquisition and
preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this test. The double
parabola test you initially proposed would not have proved or disproved cooling
radiation. The dry ice at the focus would have been
>From a fabrication standpoint here is an even simpler test for cooling
radiation.
It consists of a truncated cone lined with reflective mylar on the
inside. The wide end is open to the sky and a thermometer is located
at the vertex of the cone.
See diagram:
https://drive.google.com/fil
This paper was revised:
Mosier-Boss, P.A. and L. Forsley, Interpreting CR-39 Detectors used in Pd/D
Co-deposition: Nuclear Generated Tracks or Artifacts? J. Condensed Matter
Nucl. Sci., 2021. 34: p. 32-57.
The new version is here:
I wrote:
> The internet and ISPs can be unreliable . . . I have had files that were
> intact for years suddenly become corrupted. That must be an ISP server
> problem.
>
Which means:
You should ALWAYS keep a backup copy of any file you upload to the
internet. Keep it on your own computer, and
The new copy worked for the person who was having problems. The internet
and ISPs can be unreliable . . . I have had files that were intact for
years suddenly become corrupted. That must be an ISP server problem.
My ISP is Jumpline.com, which is usually okay, but it has strange problems
from time
JOURNAL OF CONDENSED MATTER NUCLEAR SCIENCE Vol. 34 is uploaded.
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedzg.pdf
Someone told me they had trouble downloading this file. They could not
download or print. I replaced the file. Please download it and let me know
if you have difficulty.
Pictet`s experiment of 1790 is shown in the top diagram.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MD1uL1IR0AWBTzxVU2M8vk9bKuKEi4IM/view?usp=sharing
The experiment seemed to show the reality of both hot and cold
radiation since both types of radiation could apparently be reflected and
focused with
testing
Harry
Previous email bounced.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 2:41 PM William Beaty wrote:
Very little.
I thought Jack Kevorkian held the patent and copyright on such devices.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019, Jonathan Berry wrote:
You've got to tell us more that that!
Odd devices are my bag!
It's vaguely like this one:
https://www.theonion.com/we-have-confirmation-that-someone-has-tested-a-thanatos-1819584094
Next, take that concept and invent some innocuous spinoffs.
You've got to tell us more that that!
Odd devices are my bag!
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 10:16 PM William Beaty wrote:
>
>
> > Wow, for a second I thought I was in a time warp!
>
>
> No, THIS is a timewarp. 1986 MTV video:
>
>Reich Cloudbuster (Kate Bush)
>https://youtu.be/pllRW9wETzw
>
>
Almost 10 million viewings!
Did you know the author of *Naked Lunch* used an orgone box?
https://dangerousminds.net/comments/my_life_in_orgone_boxes_william_burroughs_on_his_sexual_science_experiments
" $2M-$3M investments " Is that single investments of $3M each? Or total
investments of
Wow, for a second I thought I was in a time warp!
No, THIS is a timewarp. 1986 MTV video:
Reich Cloudbuster (Kate Bush)
https://youtu.be/pllRW9wETzw
https://www.dazeddigital.com/music/article/27217/1/the-story-behind-kate-bush-s-cloudbusting-video
BTW "Smartlists" are unix email
Watch out where the huskies go
And don't you eat that yellow snow.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 6:07 AM wrote:
>
> Testing from mx1
>
Testing from mx1
Testing mounting smartlist from mail.
Testing
rooly!
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 7:15 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> this one is
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sci.physics.research
> if that is what you speak of
That was the old usenetthey still train on Smartlists...guess the
still work.
this one is
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sci.physics.research
if that is what you speak of
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 2:32 AM William Beaty wrote:
>
>
> test
>
> (( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
> William J. Beaty
EVERY THINK SEEMS OK
Bob Cook
From: Jonathan Berry
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 11:38:56 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:are smartlists working? vortex-L test
Or, is that a dumb question? :)
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 7:38 PM Jonathan Berry
https://youtu.be/umj0gu5nEGs
Rocky Horror Picture Show
On Fri., Aug. 16, 2019, 8:58 a.m. JonesBeene, wrote:
>
>
> Wow, for a second I thought I was in a time warp….
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Rick Monteverde *.*
>
> *…*
>
> On Aug 15, 2019 at 8:32 PM, William Beaty wrote:
>
> Test
>
>
>
>
>
/LacklusterOfficial //
http://youtube.com/c/LacklusterOfficial
> On 16 Aug 2019, at 9.32, William Beaty wrote:
>
>
> test
>
> (( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
> William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
Wow, for a second I thought I was in a time warp….
From: Rick Monteverde.
…
On Aug 15, 2019 at 8:32 PM, William Beaty wrote:
Test
Still works here.
>
> On Aug 15, 2019 at 8:32 PM, William Beatywrote:
>
>
> test (( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))) William J.
> Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
> EE/programmer
Or, is that a dumb question? :)
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 7:38 PM Jonathan Berry wrote:
> Maybe, what's a "smartlist"?
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:32 PM William Beaty wrote:
>
>>
>> test
>>
>> (( ( ( ( ((O))
Maybe, what's a "smartlist"?
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 6:32 PM William Beaty wrote:
>
> test
>
> (( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
> William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
> billb at amasci com
test
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
Seattle, WA 206
Tests may start within hours.
Live video stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikP6n0YYG-A
There are some information on this test at https://www.dambros.com/en/
this issue then.
Bob Cook
From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 5:04:04 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Misuno technology a simple test
Ask Mizuno to run the system making excess thermal energy and then simply
change the inlet and outlet air
Ask Mizuno to run the system making excess thermal energy and then simply
change the inlet and outlet air flows. The outlet is currently above the inlet
and that can be a problem. This may show a dramatic drop in thermal output due
to buoyancy driven convection.
This easy and can get quick
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:48 PM Kevin O'Malley wrote:
> I received a quote from Kromek, more than 10k Pounds (I don't have the
> symbol for pounds nor euros)
>
For Pounds, press "alt+0163" = £
For Euro, press "alt+0128" = €
has to break through the bullshit. All the "credible
experts" are not stepping forward. If enough ordinary guys get
trained and test positive gammas, it will bell the cat.
Please answer the question of what it would take for YOU to bell the
cat. $5k for gamma spectrometer trainin
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
> The simple fact is that whoever goes forward to test gammas and
> actually finds them will probably find his career over. That's gotta
> be worth $100k. And that's why no one is stepping forward to overcome
> the ... bullshit.
>
I doubt that the caree
to test gammas and
actually finds them will probably find his career over. That's gotta
be worth $100k. And that's why no one is stepping forward to overcome
the ... bullshit.
On 5/18/19, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>
> Uhh, Jed I proposed explicitly that YOU woul
with the background goes and tests for gammas , then guess
what -- it'll be the end of their career. I think they will be
charging far more than $100k for doing something that ends their
career, and we see the absolute result: SILENCE. As long as there
is silence, there is no offer to test gammas. It's just
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
Uhh, Jed I proposed explicitly that YOU would be more suited to go
> and test but you declined.
Okay, you proposed I go. I told you I know nothing about this. Why are you
repeating this? You have "explicitly proposed" that the wrong person be
sent to do
he's
> tested cold fusion devices before. He declined.
I declined because I know nothing about gamma rays. I am totally
unqualified to test this claim. Also because I am in the U.S. There must be
hundreds of people in the UK qualified to do this.
The question is "what
> would i
Kevin has not replied to my message, and his intentions are unclear.
*** My initial statements were in public rather than in private. To
be candid, the paragraph you wrote to me privately right before this
one you're quoting , well that paragraph kinda sets the tone. And
since it's done in
"The offer to test for gammas was rescinded.
Please donate instead to the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project."
I don't understand why this page is still there.
***Because it all falls within my original intention, which is to bell
the cat. If in the future I decide to make MFMP a b
Uhh, Jed I proposed explicitly that YOU would be more suited to go
and test but you declined. Alan S said that it would take $1000 for
a gamma spectrometer, but he's off by 10X. Let's just apply that
coefficient elsewhere, shall we?
I think it'll take $5k to train me. Applying Allan's
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test
> Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source
>
> I received a quote from Kromek, more than 10k Pounds (I don't have the
> symbol for pounds nor euros) and they want to keep thequote to be
> confidential. This is yet anoth
hat's what it says. That's chutzpah!
It also says:
"The offer to test for gammas was rescinded.
Please donate instead to the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project.
I don't understand why this page is still there.
I wrote:
Plus, if I understand correctly, he is asking for $100,000.
>
Yup. That's what it says. That's chutzpah!
It also says:
"The offer to test for gammas was rescinded.
Please donate instead to the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project.
I don't understand why this page is still there.
wrote:
> His GofundMe campaign seems to be predicated on his raising money based on
> his coming to the lab to view my work. I repeat he is NOT invited. That
> puts all his messaging into the realm of worse than bullshit, as when one
> is raising money on false pretenses there is a different
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology
Claimed Energy Source
I received a quote from Kromek, more than 10k Pounds (I don't have the
symbol for pounds nor euros) and they want to keep the quote to be
confidential. This is yet another area where things just
ersity?
>
> Jones
>
>
> From: Kevin O'Malley
>
> https://www.gofundme.com/8nmynh-geiger?teamInvite=WC66VANcJqCD05UmM6byRPSAQOc6WHY1zMnMFDuwZkswE1QewWCy5ezPYj5IT06O
>
>> Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source
>
>> I'm setting up a G
Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed
Energy Source Inbox
Unstarred Kevin O'Malley Sat, May 11, 2019 at 8:30 PM
7 hidden messages – Show
Unstarred Kevin O'Malley Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:16 AM
Add star AlanG<&&&&&&&&am
CD05UmM6byRPSAQOc6WHY1zMnMFDuwZkswE1QewWCy5ezPYj5IT06O
>
>> Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source
>
>> I'm setting up a GoFundMe campaign to buy a gamma spectrometer and go
>> to London to test these cells, per Alan's invitation. It w
you issue an invitation to test your device. I accept your
invitation but don't have the means. I announce my intention to get
the means, and you retract your invitation, to someone with a very
pro-LENR bent. Something really doesn't add up.
even if you were Edward Teller.
***So, you're
>
> Jones
>
>
> From: Kevin O'Malley
>
> https://www.gofundme.com/8nmynh-geiger?teamInvite=WC66VANcJqCD05UmM6byRPSAQOc6WHY1zMnMFDuwZkswE1QewWCy5ezPYj5IT06O
>
>> Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source
>
>> I'm setting up a GoFundMe c
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
> It would make
> > sense for someone more qualified to make the visit , take the
> > measurements, and generate the YouTube video. Hint: Jed.
>
Not me. I do not know anything about gamma ray detection or videos.
- Jed
–
preferably one associated with the maker of the equipment or with a University?
Jones
From: Kevin O'Malley
https://www.gofundme.com/8nmynh-geiger?teamInvite=WC66VANcJqCD05UmM6byRPSAQOc6WHY1zMnMFDuwZkswE1QewWCy5ezPYj5IT06O
> Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Sou
https://www.gofundme.com/8nmynh-geiger?teamInvite=WC66VANcJqCD05UmM6byRPSAQOc6WHY1zMnMFDuwZkswE1QewWCy5ezPYj5IT06O
On 5/11/19, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
> Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source
>
>
> I'm setting up a GoFundMe campaign to buy a gamma spectro
Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source
I'm setting up a GoFundMe campaign to buy a gamma spectrometer and go
to London to test these cells, per Alan's invitation. It would make
sense for someone more qualified to make the visit , take the
measurements
Working now. There was a glitch yesterday.
I received Beaty test.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: leaking pen
Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2019 9:24:59 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:test
didnt get it. sorry.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9
didnt get it. sorry.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:14 PM William Beaty wrote:
> test
>
>
test
VoOT test successful. :)
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 8:08 PM wrote:
> Rooly!
> Regards,
>
>
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> local asymmetry = temporary success
>
>
Rooly!
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
My apologies.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
Posts not appearing on mailing list but do end up in archive.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
Test
lt;jedrothw...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jedrothw...@gmail.com');>>
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 27, 2017 4:37 PM
> *To:* Vortex
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]: MFMP starting to test me356 reactor today
>
> I do not know whether me356 claimed it takes time to crank up his machine.
Now at 15:15 local time for the researchers, the test has been running for
45 minutes. The rolling average COP=1.04 and perhaps is climbing slowly.
This test is using the heat exchanger with the flow calorimetry being run
on the cooling water side of the heat exchanger (not the reactor side
I believe the Monday test is just being setup. Apparently Me356 has setup
a freshly prepared reactor for today's test.
MFMP is using 2 different high-end power analyzers for measurement of the
input power. To Me356's credit, he has worked hard to accommodate the
continued testing even though
Looks like a major problem has been spotted, suggesting why me356
honestly thought he was getting excess heat:
His power meter was reading 0.452 KW
vs
1.112 KW from MFMP meter
Yikes... such a significant deficit error in measuring input power will
certainly give the appearance of OU. The
Has the testing concluded? It is now 3 PM in Czech.
From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 4:37 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: Re: [Vo]: MFMP starting to test me356 reactor today
I do not know whether me356 claimed it take
I do not know whether me356 claimed it takes time to crank up his machine.
I have not been following the discussion. However, if it *does* take time,
he should have told that to the people from MFMP. Or, if the machine is
unreliable and does not work some days, he should have said so. He should
Me356 apparently had troubles with the test unit. He claims that it normally
starts in about ten minutes.
In the early part of the test the plot showed that it looked like it was on the
way up in five minutes but then petered out.
MFMP ar taking a break tomorrow to giver me356 time to fix
... It would be great if this could run for several days... in the best
effort of P experiments in France, there was no excess for 60 days -
followed by several months of gain.
-
One comment on the above in the context of today's lack of results,
since there
I agree with you Brian. This is quite disappointing.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com>
To: Vortex <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sat, May 27, 2017 12:03 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: MFMP starting to test me356 reactor today
Jed is being too g
Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Apparently they are performing a test in his absence.
There is an informative ongoing summary page here - with rolling averages
https://freeboard.io/board/MwMhlL
The COP seemed to be hovering around one while I was watching. No
radiation. No surprises.
It wo
; Jed is being too generous. His failure to test today is unforgivable!
>>
> Apparently they are performing a test in his absence.
>
>
> https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5228-me356-photos-of-aura-control-unit/?postID=60623#post60623
>
> If he allows some of th
Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote:
> Jed is being too generous. His failure to test today is unforgivable!
>
Apparently they are performing a test in his absence.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5228-me356-photos-of-aura-control-unit/?postID=60623#post60623
If he
1 - 100 of 2267 matches
Mail list logo
